- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06292156
tACS Treatment for Cognitive Impairments in Methamphetamine Addicts
March 2, 2024 updated by: Xiang Yang Zhang, Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital
- To evaluate the cognitive function of methamphetamine Patients.
- Investigate the pathological mechanism of methamphetamine patients from the aspects of EEG and biology;
- The investigators investigated the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cognitive impairments in methamphetamine patients
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
300
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Xiangyang Zhang, M.D.,Ph.D
- Phone Number: +86-10-62710644
- Email: zhangxy@psych.ac.cn
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mianyang, China
- Recruiting
- Xin Hua Drug Rehabilitation Center
-
Contact:
- China
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis diagnosis of methamphetamine use disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)
- None of participants had mixed use of other drugs
- None of participants had physical disability
- None of participants had acute physical or mental illness, hallucinations, acute withdrawal symptoms
- None of participants were receiving any medical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intracranial hypertension
- Cranial defects
- Tumors
- Serious physical illnesses (e.g., cardiovascular, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal disorders)
- Infectious diseases
- Immune system disorders
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Theta treatment group
In active tACS, the target 'active' electrode was placed over the MFC and the second 'return' electrode was placed over the medial parietal cortex.
6 Hz stimulation was used and a alternating current of 2mA was applied for 30min each day(Monday-Friday) for 3 consecutive weeks.
|
The target 'active' electrode was placed over the MFC and the second 'return' electrode was placed over the medial parietal cortex.
6 Hz stimulation was used and a alternating current of 2mA was applied for 30min each day(Monday-Friday) for 3consecutive weeks
|
Active Comparator: Alpha active control group
In active tACS, the target 'active' electrode was placed over the MFC and the second 'return' electrode was placed over the medial parietal cortex.
10 Hz stimulation was used and a alternating current of 2mA was applied for 30min each day(Monday-Friday) for 3 consecutive weeks.
|
The target 'active' electrode was placed over the MFC and the second 'return' electrode was placed over the medial parietal cortex.
10 Hz stimulation was used and a alternating current of 2mA was applied for 30min each day(Monday-Friday) for 3 consecutive weeks
|
Sham Comparator: Sham control group
In sham group, Sham stimulation lasted 30 s (15 s of ramp- up and 15 of ramp-down) .
|
Sham stimulation lasted 30 s (15 s of ramp- up and 15 s of ramp-down).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), which contains 12 subtests for calculating the index scores of delayed memory (including list recall, story recall, figure recall, and list recognition tests), attention (including digit span and coding tests), language (including picture naming and semantic fluency tests), visuospatial/constructional index (including figure copy and line orientation tasks), immediate memory (including list learning and story memory tasks), and global neuropsychological function.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
ERP components associated with cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Investigate the ERP components associated with cognitive function of methamphetamine patients using event-related potential analysis
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Condition stop signal task
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Condition stop signal task was used to assess cognitive control function, including proactive control and reactive control.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Neural oscillations associated with cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Investigate the neural oscillations associated with cognitive function of methamphetamine patients using time-frequency analysis.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Functional connection of brain region associated with cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Investigate the functional connection of brain region associated with cognitive function of methamphetamine patients using functional connection analysis
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Microstate associated with cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Investigate the microstate associated with cognitive function of methamphetamine patients using microstate analysis
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The effect of oxidative stress system on cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The investigators examined markers of oxidative stress related to cognitive function using bioassay.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The effect of immune system on cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The investigators immune indicators related to cognitive function using bioassay.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The effect of brain derived neurotrophic factor(BDNF) on cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The investigators BDNF indicators related to cognitive function using bioassay.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Genetic mechanism of cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The investigators performed comprehensive genetic testing to explore the genetic mechanism of cognitive function.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reverse learning task
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Reverse learning task was used to access the compulsive drug using behavior of methamphetamine patients.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Beck Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Beck Depression Scale was used to access degree of depression.The total score varies between 0 and 30 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Barrett impulse Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The scale includes three dimensions: motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and unplanned impulsivity.
The total score varies between 30 and 150 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of impulsivity.
High scores on the three subscales indicated hyperactivity, inattention, and lack of planning, respectively.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Degree of insomnia
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Insomnia Severity Index was used acess the patient's insomnia.The total score varies between 0 and 28 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of insomnia.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward Questionnaire including penalty sensitivity factor and reward sensitivity factor.
The total score varies between 0 and 31 points, with higher scores indicating higher sensitivity to penalty and reward.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Visual analog scale(VAS) was used to acess the craving of drug on a scale of 1 to 10.A higher score indicates a higher desire for the drug
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Desires for Drug Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Desires for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ) was used to access the craving of drug, which measures three factors, including desire and intention, negative reinforcement, and control.
Higher scores of drug desire and negative reinforcement indicated higher drug craving, and higher scores of control indicated better drug craving control ability.The total score on the table is equal to the sum of the scores in the three dimensions, ranging from 3 to 21 points.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Obsessive compulsive drug use scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
The Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS) also measures three factors: thoughts about methamphetamine and interference, desire and control, and resistance to thoughts and intention.The higher the total score, the higher the craving.
The total score varies between 13 and 65 points, with higher scores indicating higher craving.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Obsessive-compulsive inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Obsessive-compulsive inventory was evaluated the subjects' obsessive-compulsive symptoms from 6 different dimensions, including washing, forcing thoughts, storing, sorting, checking, mixing.The total score varies between 0 and 72 points, with higher scores indicating more severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Thought Control Ability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Thought Control Ability Questionnaire was used to measure the ability of an individual to control unwanted and intrusive thoughts.
The total score varies between 25 and 125 points, with higher indicating scores the stronger the thought control ability.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Thought Suppression Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Thought Suppression Questionnaire were used to access the thought control ability.
The total score varies between 15 and 75 points, with higher indicating scores the stronger the thought suppression ability.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Rumination Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Rumination Questionnaire was used to access ruminate behavior.A higher total score indicates a higher tendency to ruminate.
The total score varies between 22 and 88 points, with higher scores indicating higher tendency to ruminate.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Anger Rumination Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Anger Rumination Questionnaire was used to access anger ruminate behavior.
The total score varies between 19 and 76 points, with higher scores indicating higher tendency to anger ruminate.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Beck Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Beck Anxiety Scale was used to access degree of anxiety.The total score varies between 0 and 63 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Emotional Regulation Difficulty Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Emotional Regulation Difficulty Scale was used to access the emotional regulation ability of methamphetamine patients.The total score varies between 36 and 180 points, with higher scores indicating the more serious the difficulty in emotion regulation and the lower the level of emotion regulation ability.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Aggressive questionnair
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Aggressive questionnaire was used to access aggressive behavior of methamphetamine patients.
The total score varies between 30 and 150 points, with higher scores indicating the more aggressive behavior.
|
Baseline, week 3, week7
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 20, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
March 4, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
March 4, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CASPsy7
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Data will be avaliable on request
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Methamphetamine Abuse
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Not yet recruitingMethamphetamine-dependence | Methamphetamine Abuse
-
InterveXion Therapeutics, LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedMethamphetamine-dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthNot yet recruitingMethamphetamine-dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseCanada
-
InterveXion Therapeutics, LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)TerminatedMethamphetamine-dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
University of KentuckyNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedMethamphetamine Dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)TerminatedMethamphetamine Dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
University of CincinnatiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedMethamphetamine Dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States, Canada
-
University of KentuckyNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedMethamphetamine Dependence | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityOregon Health Authority; Comagine HealthRecruitingMethamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingMethamphetamine Abuse
Clinical Trials on Theta treatment group
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanUnknownCerebral Vascular AccidentTaiwan
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruitingTreatment Resistant DepressionUnited States
-
Stanford UniversitySchatzberg, Alan, M.D.CompletedTreatment Resistant DepressionUnited States
-
Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health SciencesSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantCanada
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityUnknownChronic Kidney Diseases | Mesenchymal Stem Cells | Renal Interstitial FibrosisChina
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdCompleted
-
Baylor College of MedicineCompletedAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Università degli Studi di FerraraCompleted