Improvement of Motor Tasks: Effects of Verbal Encouragement and Music

June 6, 2024 updated by: Luca Puce, Universita degli Studi di Genova

Improvement of Motor Tasks Performance: Effects of Verbal Encouragement and Music - Key Results From a Randomised Crossover Study With Electromyography

This study employed a randomized crossover design to assess the impacts of three different experimental conditions-standard environment, music, and verbal encouragement-on performance in an isometric endurance task, with comparisons made between untrained and trained individuals. Interventions were spaced seven days apart. Measurements included muscle activity and fatigue, assessed via surface electromyography, and the duration of the task.

The isometric endurance task required participants to maintain a 90° elbow flexion while holding a dumbbell in a supine grip, weighted to 80% of their one-repetition maximum, on the dominant side. During the task, participants were to keep their back and head against a vertical wall, stand with feet shoulder-width apart, and firmly on the ground. The dumbbell was held with the dominant arm, and the other arm was kept neutral by the side. It was crucial to avoid any rocking or movements that would ease maintaining the position. The test began when the bar was handed to the participant in the correct stance and concluded once the arm's angle deviated by more than five degrees from the start.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genova, Italy, 16122
        • Universita degli Studi di Genova

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Good general health,
  • No medical conditions that could interfere with their ability to perform the test safely and effectively.
  • To be considered exercised, participants had to have performed 150 minutes per week of vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity, in addition to muscle strengthening activities, for at least two days per week. Those who did not meet this standard were considered untrained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery on the arm, shoulder or adjacent areas that could limit the ability to perform the test.
  • Use of medication that affects muscle function or pain perception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Task with verbal encouragement
Endurance isometric exercise performed with verbal encouragement
The task demanded that participants maintain their arm bent at a 90° angle while holding a dumbbell, which weighed 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), in a supine grip on the dominant side of their body for the longest time they could.
Experimental: Task with music
Endurance isometric exercise performed with music
The task demanded that participants maintain their arm bent at a 90° angle while holding a dumbbell, which weighed 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), in a supine grip on the dominant side of their body for the longest time they could.
Active Comparator: Task 1 without motivational feedback
Task without motivational feedback
The task demanded that participants maintain their arm bent at a 90° angle while holding a dumbbell, which weighed 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), in a supine grip on the dominant side of their body for the longest time they could.
Active Comparator: Task 2 without motivational feedback
Task without motivational feedback
The task demanded that participants maintain their arm bent at a 90° angle while holding a dumbbell, which weighed 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), in a supine grip on the dominant side of their body for the longest time they could.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of the task
Time Frame: Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
task duration expressed in seconds
Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Neuromuscular excitation of Biceps Brachii
Time Frame: Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Amplitude of electromyography value (Root Mean Square in microvolt) measured for Biceps Brachii muscle
Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Neuromuscular excitation of Brachioradialis
Time Frame: Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Amplitude of electromyography value (Root Mean Square in microvolt) measured for Brachioradialis muscle
Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Neuromuscular fatigue of Biceps Brachii
Time Frame: Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Time-course evolution of the Median Frequency of the Power Density Spectrum (MF Hz) of the electromyography signal measured for biceps brachii muscle
Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Neuromuscular fatigue of Brachioradialis
Time Frame: Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds
Time-course evolution of the Median Frequency of the Power Density Spectrum (MF Hz) of the electromyography signal measured for Brachioradialis muscle
Through task completion, an average of sixty seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DINOGMI-2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe