- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06479772
Evaluation of the Potential Impact of an Artificial Intelligence Solution in Second Reading of Organized Screening. (ELIAS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a retrospective multicenter study of mammography imaging data contained in the PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) of six radiology centers located in the Rhône, Puy de dôme, Cantal and Haute-Loire départements.
In order to be able to collect two-year follow-up data, the files analyzed will concern all women who received a screening mammogram during the years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. More recent mammograms will be excluded.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lyon, France, 69008
- Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
As this was a retrospective exploratory study, with no prior hypothesis, the number of subjects required was not calculated.
The study population (n=55,000) represents, for the radiology practices concerned, all mammograms examined in second reading by the Auvergne Rhône Alpes regional cancer screening coordination center between 2015 and 2019.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 50 to 74 participating in the organized screening campaign.
- Having had a screening mammogram with a final L1 result of "normal" (ACR 1/ BI-RADS 1) or "benign" (ACR 2/ BI-RADS 2).
- For which a second reading interpretation is available
- Screening mammograms performed during the years 2015 to2019 (In order to have follow-up data (subsequent mammogram or information on the person's future)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mammography not performed as part of organized screening
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of real negatives
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Percentage of cases negatived by MammoScreen (considered benign by the system), and for which no cancer was detected at the end of the L2 (according to the different risk levels of the MammoScreen software - score from 1 to 10).
We distinguish two sub-populations: L2- and L2+ with BDD- (in addition to L2-).
|
Week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of real positives
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Percentage of MammoScreen-positive cases for which cancer was detected in L2 (according to the different risk levels of the MammoScreen software - score from 1 to 10).
|
Week 8
|
|
Percentage of false negatives
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Percentage of MammoScreen-positive cases with an L2 ultimately considered negative (L2- or L2 + with DBB-), for which interval cancer is detected (according to the different risk levels of the MammoScreen software - score from 1 to 10).
|
Week 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christophe TOURASSE, MD, Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-06-051
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.