- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06509789
Priming Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke: A Study of Intensity
Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.
Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.
Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.
Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).
Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.
Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.
Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.
Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.
Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.
Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).
Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.
Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.
Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000
- Recruiting
- Jack Jiaqi Zhang
-
Contact:
- Jack Jiaqi Zhang, PhD, HKROT
- Phone Number: 27666696
- Email: jack-jq.zhang@connect.polyu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation.
- Age between 18 and 80 years.
- Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-6 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions.
- Capable of providing informed written consent. Exclusion Criteria
Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN [see supplement]).
- Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke.
- signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score<21/22 out of 30 (34).
- Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score > 2 (35).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65).
The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials.
Low intensity priming iTBS consists of a session of 55% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
|
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control.
Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
|
|
Experimental: Standard priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65).
The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials.
Standard priming iTBS consists of a session of 70% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
|
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control.
Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
|
|
Active Comparator: Nonpriming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65).
The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials.
Nonpriming iTBS consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
|
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control.
Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65).
The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials.
Sham stimulation consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 20% RMT iTBS (sham).
|
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control.
Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control.
This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
|
Baseline
|
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: At 3 weeks
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control.
This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
|
At 3 weeks
|
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: At one-month
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control.
This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
|
At one-month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: Baseline
|
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex.
P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation.
The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
|
Baseline
|
|
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: At 3 weeks
|
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex.
P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation.
The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
|
At 3 weeks
|
|
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: At one-month
|
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex.
P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation.
The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
|
At one-month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSEARS20240229001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
Clinical Trials on Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol
-
Dr Georg KranzRecruitingDepression MinorHong Kong
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompletedMajor DepressionGermany
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting
-
ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoFondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori; Istittuo ricerca carattere Sceintifico...Enrolling by invitationObsessive - Compulsive DisorderItaly
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalActive, not recruitingDepression | Mood Disorders | Depressive Disorder, Major | Psychiatric Disorder | Mental DisorderUnited States
-
Mary Phillips, MD MD (Cantab)Milken InstituteCompletedBipolar DisorderUnited States
-
Mary Phillips, MD MD (Cantab)National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedBipolar DisorderUnited States
-
University of BernTerminatedSchizo Affective Disorder | Schizophrenia; Psychosis | Schizophrenia and Related Disorders | Brief Psychotic DisorderSwitzerland
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted