Priming Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke: A Study of Intensity

July 20, 2025 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.

Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.

Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.

Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).

Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.

Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.

Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.

Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.

Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.

Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).

Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.

Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.

Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation.
  2. Age between 18 and 80 years.
  3. Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-6 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions.
  4. Capable of providing informed written consent. Exclusion Criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:

  1. any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN [see supplement]).
  2. Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke.
  3. signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score<21/22 out of 30 (34).
  4. Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score > 2 (35).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Low intensity priming iTBS consists of a session of 55% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
Experimental: Standard priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Standard priming iTBS consists of a session of 70% RMT cTBS, followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
Active Comparator: Nonpriming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Nonpriming iTBS consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 70% RMT iTBS.
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Standard 600-pulse TBS will be applied using the MagPro X100 stimulator (MagVenture, Denmark) connected with a figure-of-eight coil (Cooling B-65). The resting motor threshold (RMT) of the motor cortex (M1) will be defined as the minimum intensity over the motor hotspot that could elicit an motor evoked potential (MEP) of no less than 50 μv over the first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 trials. Sham stimulation consists of a session of 20% RMT cTBS (sham), followed by 20% RMT iTBS (sham).
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
Baseline
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: At 3 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
At 3 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores
Time Frame: At one-month
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
At one-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: Baseline
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
Baseline
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: At 3 weeks
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
At 3 weeks
P30 amplitude in the TMS-evoked potential
Time Frame: At one-month
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
At one-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) - Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol

Subscribe