Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visual Functions of Adult Amblyopia: a Preliminary Study

April 15, 2024 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Amblyopia, with a prevalence rates of 3% in adult population, is a common cause of vision impairment. It is characterized by impaired vision in one or both eyes because of disruption of normal visual stimuli and underdevelopment of the visual cortex, leads to lifelong visual deficits affecting both monocular and binocular visual function. Common causes of amblyopia include refraction error, anisometropia, strabismus and visual deprivation arising from ptosis or congenital cataract. Our previous studies had shed light on the relationship between abnormal early visual experience, and development of later amblyopia and possible neural developmental disorders. Functional recovery is difficult when neuroplasticity slows down at the end of the critical period. To date, there is no established effective treatment for adult amblyopia.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the non-invasive stimulations had been used widely as a research tool to understand the brain functions and an established treatment modality in neuropsychiatric diseases. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a newer form of rTMS protocol which have a major advantage over traditional rTMS in their reduced administration duration and allowing stimulation at significantly lower intensities to attain comparable effects. TBS had been demonstrated to able to improve functions in participants with visual disorders. However, studies of its use on adult amblyopia are scarce. Due to lack of efficient treatment at present, it is of scientific significance to conduct placebo-controlled experiments on this topic. Investigators will evaluate the effect of three regimens of TBS (intermittent, continuous and sham), after one session and accumulative sessions, on visual functions of amblyopia adults shortly after treatment and 2 weeks later (lasting effect), in order to evaluate its potential role in amblyopia and find out the best paradigm for amblyopia treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei county, Taiwan, 100225
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult amblyopia participants, aged 20-50 years old.
  2. Based on inclusion criteria, there was a minimum of 2 lines difference in BCVA between the 2 eyes.
  3. An amblyogenic factor and history of amblyopia treatment was recorded

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable vital sign
  2. History of brain injury and/or head trauma
  3. Neurological and psychiatric disease
  4. Seizures or family history of seizure
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Uncontrolled migraine or the presence of metallic implants or shunt in the head or torso
  7. Wide region of ischemic cicatrix, multiple sclerosis, taking tricycle antidepressants,
  8. Analgesics or any drugs may decrease the threshold for inducing seizure
  9. Experienced sleep disorders during the rTMS treatment
  10. Severe alcoholism or taking seizure drugs
  11. Severe heart diseases or uncontrollable migraine caused by high intracranial pressure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intermittent theta burst
The total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.
Experimental: Continuous theta burst
The total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.
Sham Comparator: Sham theta burst
The stimulus intensity in sham group is about half of that in iTBS/cTBS groups, and the subjects receive a placebo stimulation with the coil orientation tilted to 90°. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective
Time Frame: 1 month for each participant
Change from baseline best corrected visual acuity: distance visual acuity measured for each eye at a distance of 6 m. Visual acuity scored letter-by-letter instead and lonarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scores were recored.
1 month for each participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tzu-Hsun Tsai, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amblyopia

Clinical Trials on Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) procedure

3
Subscribe