Development of an Exoskeleton for Patients' Mobility.

July 16, 2024 updated by: Krongkaew Klaewkasikum, Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science & Technology (VISTEC)

The Development of an Exoskeleton System for Assisting and Enhancing Patients' Mobility.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the performance of a state-of-the-art adaptive CPG-based exoskeleton control system (intelligent mode) under a multi-metric analysis (involving three-dimensional gait analysis, muscle activity, oxygen consumption, user comfort, and exoskeleton performance scores) and comparing it to a standard commercial exoskeleton control system (default mode)

The main question it aims to answer is: Could the adaptive version improve natural walking and essential lower limb motions?

Participants will:

All participants were assigned into two groups to receive an alternate sequence of walking with the intelligent mode or the default mode of the lower-limb exoskeleton Exo-H3 at high and normal speed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy Thai adults
  • age between 18 and 60 years old
  • body mass index between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2
  • walk independently
  • willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of surgery in the back, hip, knee, or ankle area
  • previous injury or pain in the hip, knee, or ankle area that would affect walking patterns within the past 6 months
  • a history of musculoskeletal or neuromuscular disease such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis
  • a balance disorder
  • unable to continue or withdrawal from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: healthys received intelligent mode first
healthy subjects received exoskeleton with intelligent mode first
Default mode: A standard control system offering a conventional assistive function of Exo-H3.
Intelligent mode: The adaptive CPG-based control system developed by our researchers from Exo-H3.
Placebo Comparator: healthys received default mode first
healthy subjects received exoskeleton with intelligent mode first
Default mode: A standard control system offering a conventional assistive function of Exo-H3.
Intelligent mode: The adaptive CPG-based control system developed by our researchers from Exo-H3.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
gait kinematic of pelvic hip, knee and ankle joint.
Time Frame: 1 day
The average of pelvic-hip-knee-ankle angles (degrees) in frontal, sagittal and transverse plance were collected by using three dimensions with an eight-camera Motion analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporal spatial data of velocity
Time Frame: 1 day
Mean velocity (m/s) was collected by an eight-camera Motion analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
1 day
Temporal spatial data of cadence
Time Frame: 1 day
Mean cadence (step/min) was collected by an eight-camera Motion analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
1 day
Temporal spatial data of step length, step width, and stride length
Time Frame: 1 day
Mean of step length(cm), step width(cm), and stride length(cm) were collected by an eight-camera Motion analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
1 day
Temporal spatial data of stance phase and swing phase time
Time Frame: 1 day
Mean percentage of stance phase and swing phase time were collected by an eight-camera Motion analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
1 day
Muscle activity
Time Frame: 1 day
Bilateral muscles activities of gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, tensor fascia latae, rectus femoris, bicep femoris, medial gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles during walking were quantified as root mean square (RMS) in the voltage
1 day
Oxygen consumption
Time Frame: 1 day
VO2 MAX (ml/kg/min) was estimated for the walking trial.
1 day
user comfort scores
Time Frame: 1 day
The wearer's opinion to the device, their perceived change, emotion on self-image, anxiety on security, harm or painful, attachment, and movement were evaluated as the comfort score. Each item rated from a 1 (the least problem) to 5 (the most problem). Sum of total score was 30, and categorized as very comfortable (1-6 points), comfortable (7-17 points), moderately comfortable (18 points), uncomfortable (19-29 points), and uncomfortable at all (30 points). The outcome was measured after completing the walk in each exoskeleton mode.
1 day
exoskeleton performance scores
Time Frame: 1 day
The exoskeletal performance questionnaire comprised 2 domains; pain (walking, climbing stairs, rising from sitting, standing) and difficulty (descending stairs, ascending stairs, rising from sitting, standing, bending to floor, walking on even floor, walking for distance). Each item rated from 1 (minimal issues) to 5 (significant problems). The total performance score was designated as the best performance (1-11 points), good performance (12-13 points), moderate performance (33 point), poor performance (34-54 points), and the worst performance (55 points).
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Grant No. I20POM-INT010

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Exoskeleton of default mode

Subscribe