Study of Cancer Patients' Preferences for Genetic Information Modalities Preceding Theranostic Exome Analysis. (INFOGENE)

February 14, 2025 updated by: Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

Study of Cancer Patients' Preferences for Genetic Information Modalities Preceding Theranostic Exome Analysis. Qualitative Observational and Interventional Cross-sectional Study

Currently, the EXOMA2 study (NCT04614480) offers earlier and more comprehensive exome analysis in the management of cancer patients than EXOMA. Based on the active EXOMA2 patient file, the INFOGene study offers the opportunity to study patient-physician communication, to assess patient preferences with regard to different information modalities concerning theranostic exome analysis, and to reflect on information modalities to ensure optimal patient comprehension of the information provided.

The qualitative cross-sectional study includes a dual observational and interventional component involving cancer patients. The patients will come from the EXOMA 2 active file at Dijon University Hospital and the CGFL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Currently, the EXOMA2 study (NCT04614480) offers earlier and more comprehensive exome analysis in the management of cancer patients than EXOMA. Based on the active EXOMA2 patient file, the INFOGene study offers the opportunity to study patient-physician communication, to assess patient preferences with regard to different information modalities concerning theranostic exome analysis, and to reflect on information modalities to ensure optimal patient comprehension of the information provided.

The qualitative cross-sectional study includes a dual observational and interventional component involving cancer patients. The patients will come from the EXOMA 2 active file at Dijon University Hospital and the CGFL.

Phase 1 will aim to observe and analyze interpersonal communication between physicians prescribing theranostic exome analysis and cancer patients. It will be based on:

1/ ethnographic exploratory observations of 10 consultations during which the doctor will suggest that the patient undergo theranostic exome analysis, and 2/ semi-directed interviews with 10 new patients who have previously seen the doctor.

The patients will come from the EXOMA 2 active file at Dijon University Hospital and the CGFL.

  • Step 1a : - construction of a consultation observation grid (based on existing literature) / - identification and inclusion of patients and physicians observed
  • Step 1b : Observation of 10 consultations with a varied panel of prescribing physicians, taking into account taking into account gender, age, specialty and a heterogeneous sample of patients in socio-demographic and clinical terms
  • Step 1c : semi-structured interview within 10 days of the consultation with consultation with 10 other patients by an SHS researcher to assess the degree of of the information provided by the doctor and whether it can be used to respond to the patient's needs.
  • Step 1d : thematic content analysis

Phase 2 will consist in revisiting existing information supp orts (genetic counselor's explanatory note and and video). These materials will serve as a basis for work, and can be adapted according to the needs of the client.

Phase 3 will aim to evaluate patients' preferences with respect to 3 information modalities concerning a theranostic exome analysis.

  • Step 3a: medical consultation, during which the doctor will provide each of the 60 patients with the standard form of information reworked by the in phase 2
  • Step 3b : semi-structured interview within 10 days with researcher with 30 of the 60 patients.
  • Step 3c : 60 patients divided into 3 groups of 20 stratified by age, gender and cancer site.

and cancer location, including 10 seen in interview:

  • one group will receive information based solely on the video previously previously
  • one group will receive information during a consultation
  • one group will receive information first via the video and then during a consultation
  • Step 3d : A new semi-structured interview with the 60 patients. These interviews will be carried out within 2 weeks of the information phase, in order to limit memory bias but also to allow time for the patients to express themselves.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Dijon, France, 21000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient identified for inclusion in the EXOMA 2 study (exome analysis request)
  • Available to receive different types of information
  • Fluent in French
  • No prior oncogenetic consultation
  • Having been informed of the objectives of the study and having given written non-objection to participate in the INFOGene study
  • Authorizing audio recording of consultations and interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who refused to participate in the EXOMA2 study (for phase 3 patients only)
  • Has a psychiatric, cognitive or neurological disorder that makes participation impossible
  • Working in the field of genetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Phase 1:Observe communication between physicians and cancer patients
  • Observation of the 10 consultations : To ensure heterogeneous sampling, a varied panel of prescribing physicians will be selected, taking into account gender, age and specialty (oncologist versus organ specialist).
  • Conduct a semi-structured interview within 10 days of the consultation with 10 new patients who have been prescribed a theranostic exome analysis by a researcher
  • Thematic content analysis of 10 consultation observations by SHS researchers and 10 semi-structured interviews which will enable us to assess the degree of understanding of the information provided by the doctor, and whether it answers the patient's questions.
Phase 1: Observation of doctor-patient consultations Phase 2: Adaptation of information tools Phase 3: Assessment of understanding of information tools
No Intervention: Phase 2 : Revisit existing information media (GGC information note and video).
These materials will serve as a basis for our work, and may be adapted according to the results of phase 1 of our study. We will seek the advice of a partner patient, who will himself have benefited from a genetic analysis in the context of cancer, and who will be made aware of clinical research.
Other: Phase 3:Assess patients' preferences with regard to 3 information modalities
  • A medical consultation, during which the doctor will provide each of the 60 patients with the standard form of information, together with the explanatory note (INFOGene study)
  • Within 10 days, a semi-structured interview with 30 of the 60 patients. These 30 patients will be selected to ensure maximum socio-demographic and clinical (cancer location) heterogeneity.
  • Division of the 60 patients into 3 groups of 20 stratified according to age, gender and cancer location, including 10 previously interviewed (one group will receive the information based solely on the video worked previously, one group will receive the information during a consultation, one group will receive the information first via the video and then during a consultation).
  • The researcher conducts a new semi-structured interview with the 60 patients. They will provide an insight into patients' experience of the information they receive (content, form, timing).
Phase 1: Observation of doctor-patient consultations Phase 2: Adaptation of information tools Phase 3: Assessment of understanding of information tools

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concepts of communication and preferences.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 21 months.
The various interviews (phases 1 and 3) will provide an insight into patients' level of health literacy, which may explain the ease or difficulty of exchanges with the doctor (phase 1), as well as patients' preferences for one type of information over another (phase 3).
Through study completion, an average of 21 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-A00091-46

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on All Types of Metastatic Solid Malignancy

Subscribe