Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiotherapy Using Diagnostic MRI-Based and Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided On-Table Adaptive Planning in a Novel Ring Gantry Radiotherapy Device

November 22, 2022 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Feasibility and Safety of Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiotherapy Using Diagnostic MRI-Based and Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided On-Table Adaptive Planning in a Novel Ring Gantry Radiotherapy Device

Hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) limits radiation dose to the hippocampal-avoidance region while still delivering therapeutic doses of radiation to the whole brain. When used in addition to prophylactic memantine, this technique has been shown to better preserve cognitive function in patients with brain metastases outside of the hippocampal-avoidance region with no difference in intracranial progression-free and overall survival. However, HA-WBRT requires considerably longer planning time when compared to conventional WBRT (5-10 business days, compared to next-day), and studies have shown that brain metastases can grow in as rapidly as one week.

A proposed solution for quicker initiation of HA-WBRT is the use of simulation-free radiation treatment planning, in which pre-existing diagnostic images are used to generate the radiation treatment plan (as opposed to acquiring planning-specific image sets). This will be paired with the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted semi-automated planning using the FDA-approved treatment planning system called Ethos Therapy. The investigators have developed an institutional HA-WBRT auto-planning template, which has been retrospectively validated for the creation of plans that are compliant with the gold standard NRG Oncology CC001 clinical trial and are dosimetrically comparable to traditional HA-WBRT plans. Semi-automated plans will be constructed using diagnostic imaging, which will be refined as needed (adjustments for difference in gross head positioning between diagnostic imaging and radiation treatment positioning, etc.) while the patient is on the treatment table at fraction one using adaptive radiation planning. Adaptive radiotherapy is standard-of-care practice for other disease sites.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a simulation-free workflow for HA-WBRT that is AI-assisted and semi-automated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of intracranial metastatic disease from solid malignancy that is amenable to and recommended for treatment with HA-WBRT by the treating physician.
  • Patients may have had prior therapy for brain metastasis, including radiosurgery, prior whole brain RT, and surgical resection.
  • Receipt of a contrast-enhanced brain MRI performed ≤21 days prior to study registration
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥ 50
  • Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document (or that of legally authorized representative, if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days of study entry. If pregnancy test is not clinically indicated as determined by treating physician or protocol principal investigator (PI), documentation of this exception is sufficient in lieu of a pregnancy test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiotherapy
  • A diagnostic MRI-only, simulation-free plan will be generated from diagnostic brain MRI imaging, using a semi-automated, AI-assisted plan template within the Ethos Therapy system.
  • The radiation prescription dose twill be 3.0 Gy daily over approximately 2 weeks for a total of 30.0 Gy (10 fractions).
FDA-approved treatment planning system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the simulation-free hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) as measured by the successful completion of the simulation-free HA-WBRT workflow through treatment delivery
Time Frame: Through completion of treatment for all enrolled participants (estimated to be 24 months and 2 weeks)
-Success will be defined as HA-WBRT plan creation and delivery of fraction 1 using the simulation-free study workflow in one on-table attempt, without having to resort to use of a backup, simulation-based plan in at least 70% of treated patients. Unsuccessful planning and workflow delivery will be defined as multiple attempts for sim-free planning and on-table delivery without creation of a plan meeting planning constraints such that the study workflow is abandoned and a traditional simulation-based planning workflow is used instead.
Through completion of treatment for all enrolled participants (estimated to be 24 months and 2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Abraham, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202110091

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlies the results reported in the article publication, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) may be shared with investigators whose proposed use of the data (for individual participant data meta-analysis) has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals may be submitted up to 36 months following article publication to the principal investigator of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Metastatic Disease From Any Solid Malignancy

Clinical Trials on Ethos Therapy

Subscribe