- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06551090
Prediction of Anxiety and Memory State (CAMERA)
Developing the Context-Aware Multimodal Ecological Research and Assessment (CAMERA) Platform for Continuous Measurement and Prediction of Anxiety and Memory State
The purpose of this study is to look at how signals in the brain, body, and behavior relate to anxiety and memory function. This project seeks to develop the CAMERA (Context-Aware Multimodal Ecological Research and Assessment) platform, a state-of-the-art open multimodal hardware/software system for measuring human brain-behavior relationships.
The R61 portion of the project is designed to develop the CAMERA platform, which will use multimodal, passive sensor data to predict anxiety-memory state in patients undergoing inpatient monitoring with intracranial electrodes for clinical epilepsy, as well as to build CAMERA's passive data framework and active data framework.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
CAMERA will record neural, physiological, behavioral, and environmental signals, as well as measurements from ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), to develop a continuous high-resolution prediction of a person's level of anxiety and cognitive performance. CAMERA will provide a significant advance over current methods for human behavioral measurement because it leverages the complementary features of multimodal data sources and combines them with interpretable machine learning to predict human behavior. A further distinctive aspect of CAMERA is that it incorporates context-aware, adaptive EMA, where the timing of assessments depends on the subject's physiology and behavior to improve response rates and model learning. In this study, CAMERA focuses on predicting anxiety state and concurrent memory performance, but the platform is flexible for use in various domains.
Currently, it is challenging to study complex, longitudinal relationships between the brain, body, and environment in humans. Most existent tools do not allow the investigator to measure transient internal states or cognitive functions comprehensively or continuously. Instead the investigators typically rely on sparsely collected and constrained self-reports or experimental constructs, including EMA.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Angela Velazquez
- Phone Number: 646-515-1909
- Email: agv2113@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Brett E Youngerman, MD
- Phone Number: 516-946-2145
- Email: bey2103@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Brett E Youngerman, MD
- Phone Number: 646-317-2887
- Email: bey2103@cumc.columbia.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Brett E Youngerman, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must have known or suspected Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.
- Native or proficient in speaking English or Spanish.
- Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) cases: The implant plan must include hippocampal head, body, and tail electrodes either unilaterally or bilaterally.
- 7th grade reading level (minimum level considered literate for adults)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing impaired (i.e., not corrected with a hearing aid)
- Unable to read the newspaper at arm's length with corrective lenses.
- Objective intellectual impairment (estimated IQ < 70)
- Any history of Electroconvulsive Therapy or psychosis (except postictal psychosis for patients)
- Psychotic disorder (lifetime)
- Current Anxiety disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, or Bipolar Disorder
- Neurodegenerative diseases, presence of widespread brain lesions, language problems (other than naming difficulty)
- Medical conditions that could potentially affect cognitive performance (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, cancer with metastatic potential).
- Acute renal failure or end-stage renal disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: CAMERA
Adult subjects with epilepsy will undergo noninvasive video Electroencephalography (EEG) and intracranial electrodes sampling the amygdala and hippocampus (unilateral or bilateral).
A subset of subjects (n=10) will use the Context-Aware Multimodal Ecological Research and Assessment (CAMERA) platform for 2 weeks after discharge with a subset of modalities: physiologic wristband, smartphone phenotyping, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys, and memory task.
At unpredictable intervals, CAMERA will interrupt subjects with: (a) an audible alarm to elicit an acoustic startle response; (b) a self-reported anxiety state scale; and (c) a visuospatial memory task with threat interference.
For example, participants will fill out a brief survey and play a video game several times each day and wear a wristband with sensors.
|
The CAMERA platform is a multimodal, hardware-software framework for measuring brain-behavior interactions in an unstructured environment and predict ecological states.
CAMERA will use multimodal, passive sensor data to predict anxiety-memory state in patients undergoing inpatient monitoring with intracranial electrodes for clinical epilepsy.
CAMERA consists of: Wristband sensors of autonomic physiologic signals, emphasizing heart rate metrics and electrodermal activity; Smartphone usage, emphasizing natural language processing of text input for linguistic features; Subject-tracking audiovisual array, emphasizing subject vocal activity; Intracranial neural recordings, emphasizing hippocampal theta power and high-frequency activity (~70-200 Hz).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean absolute error between predicted and actual ecological momentary assessment (EMA) scores
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Use a multimodal machine learning model (EMANet ) to predict ≥1 EMA anxiety-memory state outcome (target) in held-out data at the population level.
Mean absolute error will be the mean difference in absolute value of predicted EMA and actual EMA scores.
A higher mean error represents a less accurate prediction.
Prediction must use ≥2 different passive modalities, showing significantly better prediction accuracy than either of the modalities alone.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Percent of subjects demonstrating improvement in the EMANet prediction over time.
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Use EMANet to predict ≥1 ecological momentary assessment (EMA) anxiety-memory state outcome (target) demonstrating improvement over time as measured with a linear regression applied to the mean absolute error between predicted and actual EMA values measured over days.
Prediction must use ≥2 different passive modalities, showing significantly better prediction accuracy than either of the modalities alone.
|
1-30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean absolute error between predicted and actual absolute error on a daily basis
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Use a multimodal machine learning model of prediction uncertainty (UncertaintyNet) to predict the mean absolute prediction error of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) predictions in held-out data, at single-subject level on each day.
Mean absolute error will measure the difference between the predicted error (based on all available data) and the actual error.
|
1-30 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Jitter of neural data (milliseconds)
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Precise synchronization of neural data with jitter <30 milliseconds.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Latency of audiovisual data (seconds)
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Precise synchronization of audiovisual data with latency <10 seconds.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Latency of wrist sensor data (minutes)
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Precise synchronization of wrist sensor data with latency <2 minutes.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Latency of smartphone data (minutes)
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Precise synchronization of smartphone data with latency <20 minutes.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Jitter of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivery. (milliseconds)
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Successful delivery of EMA assessments with precise synchronization of ecological momentary assessment delivery with jitter <50 milliseconds.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Percentage improvement in normalized response rate to ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivery.
Time Frame: 1-30 days
|
Successful delivery of EMA assessments with ≥10% statistically significant (p<0.05)
improvement in normalized response rate over time (across subjects) with implementation of context-aware EMA delivery using ResponseNet.
|
1-30 days
|
|
Number of subjects demonstrating feasibility of translation to the ambulatory setting.
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Collection of (synchronized) non-neural physiological, smartphone and EMA (survey and task) data from 10 outpatients in the ambulatory setting consecutively for 2 weeks with <10% passive data loss.
|
14 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Joshua Jacobs, PhD, University of Chicago
- Principal Investigator: Brett E Youngerman, MD, Columbia University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAU7374
- 1R61MH135405-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epilepsy
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Active, not recruitingEpilepsies, Partial | Intractable Epilepsy | Focal Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children | Epilepsy, FocalUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaTerminatedJuvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy | Childhood Absence Epilepsy | Juvenile Absence EpilepsyCanada
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Epilepsy | Focal EpilepsyNorway
-
UCB Pharma SACompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonicPoland, Sweden, Hungary, Czechia
-
UCB PharmaCompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonic
-
Institute of Child HealthGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruitingEpilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children
-
University Hospital, LilleCompletedFocal Epilepsy | Epilepsy IntractableFrance
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBoston University; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke...CompletedEpilepsy | Epilepsy; Seizure | Rolandic Epilepsy | Rolandic Epilepsy, Benign | Centrotemporal Epilepsy | Centrotemporal; EEG Spikes, Epilepsy of ChildhoodUnited States