- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06562179
A Prospective, Single-Center Investigation of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Foregut Operations for Benign and Malignant Disease
A Prospective, Single-Center Investigation of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Foregut Operations for Benign and Malignant Disease.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Daniel Robledo, MS
- Phone Number: 56518 8139716000
- Email: daniel.robledo@adventhealth.com
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
- Recruiting
- AdventhHealth
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sharona Ross, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Iswanto Sucandy, MD
-
Contact:
- Daniel Robledo, MS
- Phone Number: 56518 8139716000
- Email: danel.robledo@adventhealth.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Cholecystectomy Stage 1 - Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either male or female
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign disease
Fundoplication Stage 1- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with GERD and/or hiatal hernia
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
Gastrectomy Stage 2- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign or relatively early malignant disease of the stomach
- AJCC 8th edition T0 or T1 tumor pathology
- AJCC 8th edition T2, T3, tumor pathology (following neoadjuvant therapy if necessary) at the discretion of the investigator
- Free of metastatic disease
Distal Pancreatectomy Stage 2- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign or malignant disease of the pancreas
- No vascular involvement
- Free of metastatic disease
Pancreaticoduodenectomy Stage 3- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign or malignant disease of the pancreas
- Diagnosed with benign or malignant distal bile duct disease
- No vasculature involvement (i.e., no T4 disease, pancreatic or Stage 4a or b disease, or distal bile duct Stage 3b or 4 disease)
- Free of metastatic disease
Esophagectomy Stage 3- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign or malignant disease of the esophagus
- AJCC 8th edition T0, T1a, T1b, T2 (without other indications for neoadjuvant therapy) tumor pathology
- AJCC 8th edition some T2, T3, or T4a, (following neoadjuvant therapy) at the discretion of the investigator
- Free of metastatic disease
Hepatectomy Stage 4- Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
- Either men or women
- BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2
- ASA ≤ 3
- Diagnosed with benign or malignant disease of the liver or bile duct
- Free of metastatic disease, not including metastatic disease to the liver (e.g., colorectal liver metastases)
Exclusion Criteria
Cholecystectomy Stage 1- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergent operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Subjects with malignant disease
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
Fundoplication Stage 1- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergent operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
Gastrectomy Stage 2- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergency operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
- AJCC 8th edition T2, T3, T4a, T4b tumor pathology (without neoadjuvant therapy unless contraindicated)
- Clinical or radiological evidence of distant metastatic disease
Distal Pancreatectomy Stage 2- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergent operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
- Tumor involvement with surrounding vasculature (e.g., common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein, portal vein)
- Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic disease
Pancreaticoduodenectomy Stage 3- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergent operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
- Tumor involvement with surrounding vasculature (e.g., T4a for pancreatic disease: common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein, portal vein)
- Tumor involvement with surrounding vasculature (e.g., T3b for bile duct disease: common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein, portal vein)
- Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic disease
Esophagectomy Stage 3- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergency operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
- AJCC 8th edition T2 (in some circumstances), T3, and T4a tumor pathology (without neoadjuvant therapy)
- Clinical or radiological evidence of distant metastatic disease
Hepatectomy Stage 4- Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject requiring an emergency operation
- Pregnancy or nursing
- BMI > 26 kg/m2
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindicated for general anesthesia or minimally invasive surgery
- Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (i.e., Klatskin tumor)
- Involvement of major vasculature (ex: portal vein, hepatic artery, or inferior vena cava)
- Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: da Vinci SP® Single-Port Robotic Surgical System
This study will be separated into four stages, depending on the condition the participant is diagnosed with. Each Participant will go through (1) one operation. Stage One will include five (5) subjects who undergo cholecystectomy and five (5) subjects who undergo hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication (Nissen or Toupet) for a total of ten (10) subjects. Stage Two will include five (5) subjects who undergo gastrectomy and five (5) subjects who undergo distal pancreatectomy for a total of ten (10) subjects. Stage Three will include five (5) subjects who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy and five (5) subjects who undergo esophagectomy for a total of ten (10) subjects. Stage Four will include five (5) subjects who undergo hepatectomy |
The da Vinci SP® Surgical System is designed to enable the performance of surgical procedures using a minimally invasive single-port approach.
The system consists of a Surgeon Console, a Vision Cart, and a Patient Cart and is used with a camera, instruments, and accessories.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Completion Using the planned da Vinci SP-assisted Single Port Robot.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The number of subjects who completed the planned da Vinci SP-assisted operation without conversion to an alternate approach.
Conversion to an alternate approach comprises conversion to open, multiport laparoscopic, multiport robotic or hand-assisted approach requiring undocking of the da Vinci SP Surgical System in order to complete the planned operation using the alternate approach.
|
12 months
|
|
Intraoperative and post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The incidence of all intraoperative and post-operative adverse events that occur through the 24-month follow-up period.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of Positive resection Margins
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Number of positive resection margins in patients with Malignant disease.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of Lymph node yield
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Number of lymph node yield in patients with Malignant disease.
|
24 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Status Classification
Time Frame: Pre-Operative Visit
|
Assessment of the fitness of patient before surgery using the ASA Physical Status Score: Class I - A patient in normal health Class II - A patient with mild systemic disease resulting in no functional limitations Class III - A patient with severe systemic disease that limits activity, but is not incapacitating Class IV - A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life Class V - A moribund patient not likely to survive without the operation Class VI - A patient already declared brain dead whose organs are being removed for donor purposes |
Pre-Operative Visit
|
|
Charlson Comorbidity Index Score
Time Frame: Pre-Operative Visit
|
Predicts one-year mortality for patients with a range of comorbid conditions, helping the physician determine how aggressively to treat a condition. This index score is assessed by assigning points (1,2,3 or 6) based on the likelihood of dying associated to 17 different conditions (co-morbidities). Scores are summed to provide a total score to predict mortality. Comorbidity classification is categorized as low (score ≤ 3), moderate (score 4 and 5), high (score 6 and 7), and very high comorbidity (score ≥ 8) |
Pre-Operative Visit
|
|
Operative Time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
Measured in minutes
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
|
Measured after surgery in milliliters of blood.
Estimated based on blood infusion volume during the surgery.
|
Intraoperatively
|
|
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
|
Incidence rate - number of intraoperatively complications during surgery.
|
Intraoperatively
|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 10 day, 2 months post surgery
|
Incidence number of complications, assessed through electronic medical records (EMR) at 10 days 60 days post-surgery.
|
10 day, 2 months post surgery
|
|
Post surgery complications
Time Frame: 2 months post surgery
|
Rate of complications collected in the electronic medical using the Clavien-Dindo classification system for grading adverse events. Classification of surgical complications: Grade I - Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II - Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included Grade III - Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IIIa - Intervention not under general anesthesia Grade IIIb - Intervention under general anesthesia Grade IV - Life threatening complication (including Central Nervous System (CNS) complications) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IVa - Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IVb - Multiorgan dysfunction Grade V - Death of a patient |
2 months post surgery
|
|
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 10 days post-surgery
|
Has patient expired during in-hospital stay post-surgery.
|
10 days post-surgery
|
|
Date of Discharge
Time Frame: 10 days post-surgery
|
Measured in number of days
|
10 days post-surgery
|
|
Survival
Time Frame: 10 days, 2, months, annually through year 5
|
Assessed through follow-up visits.
Data collected through patient's chart in the electronic medical record (EMR).
|
10 days, 2, months, annually through year 5
|
|
Disease reoccurrence
Time Frame: 10 day, 2 month and annually through year 5
|
Review of EMR records for new diagnosis assessed at schedule visits.
Measured in number of days until reoccurrence diagnosis is noted in the patients' record.
|
10 day, 2 month and annually through year 5
|
|
30-Day Readmission
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
|
Review of EMR records for any readmission following discharge post surgery
|
30 days post surgery
|
|
30-day complications
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
|
Assessed as number of complications experienced by patient in the 30-day period post-surgery.
|
30 days post surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sharona Ross, MD, Adventhealth
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rosemurgy A, Wilfong C, Craigg D, Co F, Sucandy I, Ross S. The Evolving Landscape of Esophageal Cancer: A Four-Decade Analysis. Am Surg. 2019 Sep 1;85(9):944-948.
- Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.
- Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Albrink M, Choung E, Dapri G, Gallagher S, Hernandez J, Horgan S, Kelley W, Kia M, Marks J, Martinez J, Mintz Y, Oleynikov D, Pryor A, Rattner D, Rivas H, Roberts K, Rubach E, Schwaitzberg S, Swanstrom L, Sweeney J, Wilson E, Zemon H, Zundel N. Consensus statement of the consortium for LESS cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2711-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2478-y. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
- Ross S, Roddenbery A, Luberice K, Paul H, Farrior T, Vice M, Patel K, Rosemurgy A. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs. conventional laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD: is there a difference? Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):538-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2476-0. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Sukharamwala P, Teta A, Ross S, Co F, Alvarez-Calderon G, Luberice K, Rosemurgy A. Over 250 Laparoendoscopic Single Site (LESS) Fundoplications: Lessons Learned. Am Surg. 2015 Sep;81(9):870-5.
- Rosemurgy AS, Downs D, Swaid F, Ross SB. Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Nissen Fundoplication: How We Do It. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Dec;20(12):2093-2099. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3290-0. Epub 2016 Oct 11. No abstract available.
- Ryan CE, Ross SB, Sukharamwala PB, Sadowitz BD, Wood TW, Rosemurgy AS. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy: a robotic or LESS approach. JSLS. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):e2014.00246. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00246.
- Barbaros U, Sumer A, Demirel T, Karakullukcu N, Batman B, Icscan Y, Saricam G, Serin K, Loh WL, Dinccag A, Mercan S. Single incision laparoscopic pancreas resection for pancreatic metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):566-70. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008448.
- Rosemurgy AS, Ross SB, Espeut A, Nguyen D, Crespo K, Syblis C, Vasanthakumar P, Sucandy I. Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Apr 1;234(4):677-684. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000137.
- Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Bourdeau T, Craigg D, Spence J, Alvior J, Sucandy I. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):613-624. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.040. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
- Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Bourdeau T, Jacob K, Thomas J, Przetocki V, Luberice K, Sucandy I. Cost Analysis of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at a High-Volume Robotic Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):461-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.062. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
- Belfiori G, Crippa S, Francesca A, Pagnanelli M, Tamburrino D, Gasparini G, Partelli S, Andreasi V, Rubini C, Zamboni G, Falconi M. Long-Term Survivors after Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Actual 5-Year Analysis of Disease-Specific and Post-Recurrence Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8249-8260. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10401-7. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
- Sucandy I, Shapera E, Syblis CC, Crespo K, Przetocki VA, Ross SB, Rosemurgy AS. Propensity score matched comparison of robotic and open major hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6724-6732. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08948-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
- Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM, Dagenborg VJ, Rosok BI, Fagerland MW, Waaler Bjornelv GM, Kristiansen R, Flatmark K, Fretland AA, Edwin B; OSLO-COMET Survival Study Collaborators. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases : A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Feb;174(2):175-182. doi: 10.7326/M20-4011. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
- Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353.
- Shapera E, Sucandy I, Syblis C, Crespo K, Ja'Karri T, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Cost analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy: Is the robotic platform more expensive? J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01375-z. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
- Wecowski J, Ross SB, Jadick MF, Justice A, Sucandy I, Rosemurgy AS. THE Big Deal: An Institution's Experience with Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy. Am Surg. 2019 Sep 1;85(9):1061-1065.
- van den Berg JW, Luketich JD, Cheong E. Oesophagectomy: The expanding role of minimally invasive surgery in oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Dec;36-37:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
- Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):777-84. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777.
- Sucandy I, Jacoby H, Crespo K, Syblis C, App S, Ignatius J, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. A Single Institution's Experience With Robotic Minor and Major Hepatectomy. Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1387-1391. doi: 10.1177/00031348211047500. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
- Rosemurgy AS, Luberice K, Krill E, Castro M, Espineira GR, Sucandy I, Ross S. 100 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomies: The Future at Hand. Am Surg. 2020 Aug;86(8):958-964. doi: 10.1177/0003134820942181. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
- Qu L, Zhiming Z, Xianglong T, Yuanxing G, Yong X, Rong L, Yee LW. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1907766
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Foregut Operations
-
Seva Canada SocietyPragyaan Sustainable Health Outcomes Foundation; Pushpagiri Vitreo Retina Institute...RecruitingQuality Improvement | Appointments and Schedules | Operations Research WorkflowIndia
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsCompletedOrthopedic Operations
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisCompletedPostoperative Complications After Gastrointestinal OperationsBrazil
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasCompletedRenal Resistive Index | Outcome | Major High Risk OperationsItaly
-
Kyle A PerryCompletedNausea and Vomiting Post-foregut SurgeryUnited States
-
Yale UniversityRecruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Pancreas Adenocarcinoma | Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma | Esophageal Adenocarcinoma | Ampullary Adenocarcinoma | Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma | Duodenal Adenocarcinoma | Foregut Adenocarcinoma | Intra - and Extrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
-
Children's Fractures Interest Group, DenmarkNot yet recruitingAdolescent | Fractures, Bone | Child | Radius Fractures | Forearm Injuries | Internal Fixation | Radiography | Orthopedic Operations | Ulna Fractures | Fracture Healing | Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary | Polymers | Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Denmark
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaCompletedLung, Prostate, Breast, Colon, Pancreatic, Renal, Bladder,Thyroid, Ovarian, Head and Neck,GI (Foregut - Esophagus),GI (Midgut) Cancer | Cancer of the Ovarian, Head and Neck,GI (Foregut - Esophagus),GI (Midgut), Sarcoma Cancer | Cancer of Neuro-onc, Parathyroid, Desmoid Tumors, Melanoma...United States
-
University of South FloridaJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (JAHVH)RecruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | Military OperationsUnited States
-
Sakarya UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Regional Anesthesia | Interscalene Blocks | Shoulder Surgeries Operations | Costoclavicular BlockTurkey
Clinical Trials on da Vinci SP® Single-Port Robotic Surgical System
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalIntuitive SurgicalActive, not recruitingColorectal NeoplasmsTaiwan
-
Ruijin HospitalIntuitive SurgicalRecruitingThoracic Surgery | da Vinci SP Surgical SystemChina
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompleted
-
Deborah Farr, MDRecruitingBreast Cancer | High Risk of Breast CancerUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawnMalignant Neoplasm of ProstateUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedHead and Neck NeoplasmsUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
Jeng-Fu YouActive, not recruitingRectal Neoplasms | Rectal Cancer Patients | Rectal Benign LesionsTaiwan
-
National Taiwan University HospitalIntuitive SurgicalRecruitingUpper Tract Urothelial CancerTaiwan
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalIntuitive SurgicalActive, not recruitingBreast Cancer | BRCA1 Mutation | BRCA2 Mutation | Nipple-sparing Mastectomy | Prophylactic MastectomyTaiwan