- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06613854
Effect of Early Combination Antihyperglycemic Treatment on Metabolic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes (E-SEMPA)
Effect of Early Combination Antihyperglycemic Treatment With Metformin and Oral Semaglutide vs. Metformin and Empagliflozin on Glycemic and Metabolic Control in Individuals With Short Duration Type 2 Diabetes
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if early combination with two antidiabetic drugs further improves blood glucose control compared to a single drug regimen in adults with short duration of type 2 diabetes. It will also learn about the effect of the combination treatment on body weight, body composition, blood lipids, oxidative stress, inflammation, metabolic control, insulin resistance and insulin secretion from pancreas, together with its safety profile. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does early combination with two antidiabetic drugs improve blood glucose levels, determined by continuous glucose monitoring system?
- Is early combination treatment as safe as treatment with a single antidiabetic drug?
- Does early combination treatment reduces the need for rescue therapy?
- Does early combination treatment reduces body weight and improves body composition?
- Does early combination treatment improves blood lipid parameters, oxidative stress and inflammation?
- Does early combination treatment improves metabolic parameters?
- Does early combination treatment improves insulin resistance and insulin secretion?
Researchers will compare early combination treatment with metformin and either peroral semaglutide or empagliflozin to a single drug regimen with only metformin to see if the combination treatment works to treat type 2 diabetes.
Participants will:
- Take the combination of two antidiabetic drugs or only metformin for every day for 26 weeks.
- Visit the clinic four times during the study duration for checkups and tests.
- Carry a continuous glucose monitoring sensor for 14 days prior to study visits.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a progressive chronic disease and represents a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease. In addition to managing glycemia, the use of antihyperglycemic medications with further and independent cardiovascular benefits is recommended in managing individuals with T2D. These medications primarily include sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). Traditionally, treatment of T2D followed a stepwise intensification by adding antihyperglycemic drugs if optimal glycemic control was not achieved. However, current American Diabetes Association guidelines recommend considering early combination therapy at treatment initiation, particularly at high baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, to shorten the time to achieve glycemic goals.
In everyday clinical practice, however, treatment intensification is often delayed due to clinical inertia, even when glycemic control is suboptimal. Early intensive treatment of T2D has been shown to improve glycemic control, reduce mortality, and lower the risk of both microvascular and macrovascular complications, while also improving the durability of the glycemic effect.
Previous randomized clinical trials on early combination therapy for T2D have primarily focused on glycemic control, as determined by traditional glycemic parameters such as fasting glucose and HbA1c. However, new insights suggest that these measures alone are insufficient for a holistic assessment of glycemic control in diabetes. There is now a recognized need to consider additional indicators of glycemic control, obtained through continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. Furthermore, data are lacking on the direct comparison of the early combination treatment with either SGLT2i or GLP-1RA on top of metformin.
In this 26-week, prospective, open-label, interventional, randomized, single-center clinical trial with a 3-week run-in period, we aim to investigate the effect of early combination treatment with metformin and GLP-1RA or SGLT2i compared to standard monotherapy with metformin and subsequent escalation of antihyperglycemic treatment on glycemic control, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring systems and HbA1c, body weight, body composition, lipid profile, oxidative stress, inflammation, metabolic control, insulin resistance, and pancreatic beta-cell function in adults with short duration T2D. The primary outcome of the study will be glycemic control, assessed by time in range (TIR).
The study will include individuals of both sexes, of any race or ethnicity, aged between 18 and 70, with a duration of T2D of less than 2 years, HbA1c levels ≤8.0%, on monotherapy with metformin, and naive to treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT2i.
After the initial 3-week run-in period, patients will be randomized (based on sex, age, and TIR during the run-in period) into three intervention groups in a 1:1:1 ratio:
(i) a control group, continuing metformin monotherapy; (ii) the first study group, receiving metformin and oral semaglutide; and (iii) the second study group, receiving metformin and empagliflozin.
Patients will then be monitored approximately every 13 weeks (3 months) up to 26 weeks (6 months). Prior to randomization, participants will receive a study package containing 3 sensors and 1 reader of the CGM system. The first sensor will be placed on the participants at the start of the run-in period, and subsequent sensors will be self-applied by participants at least 14 days before the last two study visits (at week 13 and week 26).
At each study visit, a review of medical records, a clinical examination, and blood collection for laboratory tests will be conducted. At randomization (week 0) and during the final study visit (week 26), all participants will undergo a modified oral glucose tolerance test (mOGTT) to assess insulin resistance and pancreatic beta-cell function. Additionally, the first 20 participants from each intervention group will undergo whole-body imaging to evaluate body composition. In the case of inadequately controlled glycemia, rescue treatment with gliclazide from the sulfonylurea class will be initiated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
- Recruiting
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Diabetes Outpatient Clinic
-
Contact:
- Jaka Sikonja, MD
- Phone Number: +38640778882
- Email: jaka.sikonja@kclj.si
-
Principal Investigator:
- Andrej Janez, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Urh Groselj, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Jaka Sikonja, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for up to 2 years (prior to randomization);
- Aged between 18 and 70 years, both sexes, of any race or ethnicity;
- HbA1c ≤8.0% at randomization;
- Baseline treatment with metformin at a steady daily dose of ≥1500 mg;
- Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Treatment at any time in the past with SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or DPP-4 inhibitors;
- Insulin treatment for longer than 2 weeks in the past;
- Body Mass Index below 22 kg/m2 or BMI above 40 kg/m2;
- Chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 (eGFR below 60 ml/min or the presence of albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio above 34 g/mmol);
- Known cardiovascular disease (angina pectoris, history of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, known carotid atherosclerosis, objectively proven peripheral arterial disease, or other known atherosclerotic disease at other locations);
- Moderate or severe liver disease (Child-Pugh stage B or C);
- Personal history of pancreatitis;
- Advanced heart failure (NYHA III-IV);
- Retinopathy or maculopathy or their active treatment;
- Pregnancy, expected pregnancy, or breastfeeding;
- Presence of active malignancy or personal history of malignancy within 5 years of study enrollment;
- Personal history of thyroid cancer; personal or family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma;
- Chronic inflammatory bowel disease;
- History of bariatric surgery or other gastrointestinal surgery that could affect drug or nutrient absorption;
- Frequent or severe urinary tract infections;
- Presence of a urinary catheter;
- Troublesome and recurrent genital fungal infections;
- Personal history of ketoacidosis;
- Symptomatic hypotension or predisposition to hypovolemia;
- History of organ transplantation;
- Allergy to any component in the semaglutide or empagliflozin oral tablet;
- Any medical or social circumstance that may limit participation in the study (e.g., inability to attend regular study visits);
- Any other condition that, in the opinion of the principal and responsible investigators, may affect the safety or efficacy of the treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Oral Semaglutide Arm
Participants will receive oral semaglutide in addition to metformin (in a steady daily dose of ≥1500 mg), starting with an initial dose of 3 mg.
The dose of semaglutide will be increased to 7 mg after 30 days, and then to a maintenance dose of 14 mg once daily after another 30 days that will be continued to week 26.
In the case of inadequately controlled glycemia (HbA1c >8.0 % or symptomatic hyperglycemia), rescue treatment with gliclazide will be initiated.
|
Semaglutide Oral Tablets will be introduced to the Oral Semaglutide Arm as per protocol for regular therapy introduction.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Empagliflozin Arm
Participants will receive oral empagliflozin in a once daily dose of 10 mg in addition to metformin (in a steady daily dose of ≥1500 mg).
The dose of empagliflozin will not be subsequently changed during the duration of the study.
In the case of inadequately controlled glycemia (HbA1c >8.0 % or symptomatic hyperglycemia), rescue treatment with gliclazide will be initiated.
|
Empagliflozin Oral Tablets will be introduced to the Empagliflozin Arm as per protocol for regular therapy introduction.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control Arm
Participants will receive metformin in a steady daily dose of ≥1500 mg.
In the case of inadequately controlled glycemia (HbA1c >8.0 % or symptomatic hyperglycemia), rescue treatment with gliclazide will be initiated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Time Frame: Period of 14 days prior to last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is in the range of 3.9-10.0
mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Period of 14 days prior to last study visit (week 26)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change in Time in Range (TIR)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Absolute Change in Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in %)
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time above Range (TAR)
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is above 10.0 mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time below Range (TBR)
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is below 3.9 mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time above Range (TAR) - Level 1 Hyperglycemia
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is in the range of 10.1-13.9
mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time above Range (TAR) - Level 2 Hyperglycemia
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is above 13.9 mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time below Range (TBR) - Level 1 Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is in the range of 3.0-3.8
mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time below Range (TBR) - Level 2 Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is below 3.0 mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Time in Tight Range (TITR)
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Defined as the time (or percentage of measurements) when the glucose value in the interstitial fluid is in the range of 3.9-7.8
mmol/L.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Coefficient of variation (CV)
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
A measure of dynamic glucose variability.
Calculated as a ratio of glucose concentration standard deviation and mean glucose concentration, expressed as a percentage.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in %).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Mean Time in Range (TIR)
Time Frame: Study visit at week 13 and week 26
|
Mean Time in Range (TIR) at study visit at week 13 and week 26.
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in % or in hours and minutes).
|
Study visit at week 13 and week 26
|
|
Mean glucose concentration
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in mmol/L).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with Coefficient of variation (CV) below or equal to 36%
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in %).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Standard deviation of mean glucose concentration
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in mmol/L).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with Time in Range (TIR) above 70%
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in %).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with Time in Range (TIR) above 90%
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assesment by Continuous Glucose Monitoring system FreeStyle Libre 2 (in %).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) below 6.5%
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in %)
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) below 5.7%
Time Frame: Last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in %).
|
Last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants requiring rescue therapy with gliclazide
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with severe hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
Severe hypoglycemia is an epizode of hypoglycemia requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other corrective actions.
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with severe adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
Severe adverse event is defined as symptoms that significantly affects daily activities.
Assessment by patients themselves.
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of patients withdrawing from the trial due to adverse events of the interventional drugs
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by patients themselves.
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) to last study visit (week 26)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Measured in kg.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with a reduction of Body Weight above or equal to 5%
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Proportion of participants with a reduction of Body Weight above or equal to 10%
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Measured in cm.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Visceral Adipose Tissue Mass
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by Dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Measured in g.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in the Proportion of the Total Body Fat Mass
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by Dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Measured in %.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Total Cholesterol (TC)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Triglycerides (TG)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Apolipoprotein B (ApoB)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods (in mmol/L).
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Total Antioxidant Status
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Glutathione Peroxidase Activity in Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Superoxide Dismutase Activity in Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Uric Acid
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Advanced Oxidation Protein Products (AOPP)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Advanced Glycosylation End Products (AGE)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of 8-Isoprostane
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Beta-hydroxybutyrate
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Free Fatty Acids
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change of Insulin Resistance - Matsuda Index
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Insulin Resistance will be estimated from Matsuda Index from modified Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (mOGTT).
Lower values of Matsuda Index mean a higher level of insulin resistance.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change of Insulin Resistance - HOMA-IR
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Insulin Resistance will be estimated from Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR).
Higher values of HOMA-IR mean higher insulin resistance.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change of Insulin Sensitivity - HOMA2-%S
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) will be used to calculate insulin sensitivity. It will be reported as HOMA2-%S (where 100% means normal insulin sensitivity). HOMA2-%S is reciprocal of Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance - HOMA-IR. Calculated using HOMA2 Calculator v2.2.4, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism; Oxford University, United Kingdom. |
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change of Pancreatic Beta Cell Function - HOMA2-%B
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Pancreatic Beta Cell Function will be estimated from Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 of B-cell Function (HOMA2-%B), where 100% means normal Beta cell function. Calculated with HOMA2 Calculator v2.2.4, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism; Oxford University, United Kingdom. |
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Alanine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Leucine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Isoleucine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Valine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Phenylalanine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Methionine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Lysine
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Glutamate
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Acylcarnitine C5
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Acylcarnitine C8:1
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Acylcarnitine C5-OH
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Acylcarnitine C4-OH
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
|
Change in Concentration of Acylcarnitine C4-DC
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Assessment by biochemical methods, including tandem mass spectrometry.
|
Baseline (week 0) and last study visit (week 26)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Metabolic Diseases
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Hyperinsulinism
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Insulin Resistance
- Hypoglycemic Agents
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
- semaglutide
- empagliflozin
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-SEMPA
- 0120-70/2024-2711-3 (Other Identifier: National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
-
Embecta Corp.Jaeb Center for Health ResearchWithdrawnType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | T2D | T2DM | Type 2 DM | T2DM With Inadequate Glycemic ControlUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Nutrition | Diabetes Type 2 | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | Diabetes Mellitis | T2DM | Diabetes EducationUnited States
-
Thymia LimitedCompletedType 2 Diabetes | Diabetes (DM) | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | T2DMUnited Kingdom
-
University of Colorado, DenverAmerican Academy of Family PhysiciansRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | T2D | T2DM | Artificial Intelegence | Remote Patient MonitoringUnited States
-
Beijing HospitalRecruitingType 2 Diabetic Patients | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | T2DMChina
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type2Diabetes
-
Alnylam PharmaceuticalsRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)United States
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruiting
-
Chipscreen Biosciences, Ltd.Not yet recruitingT2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
-
Parc Sanitari Pere VirgiliNot yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Spain
Clinical Trials on Oral semaglutide
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompleted
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompleted
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompleted
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruiting
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompleted
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompleted
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHealthy Volunteers Type 2 DiabetesUnited Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedType 2 Diabetes | Healthy VolunteersGermany
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Switzerland
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Germany