The Effect of Stress Ball on Recovery Quality and Hospital Discharge

October 9, 2024 updated by: Seval Ulubay

The Effect of Stress Ball Application After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Patients' Recovery Quality and Hospital Discharge Time: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study aims to investigate the effect of stress ball application after transurethral resection of the prostate on patients' recovery quality and hospital discharge time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The stress ball, one of the distraction methods, is an effective technique for ensuring cognitive focus. It has been observed that the stress ball method is used to reduce patients' anxiety and pain. Squeezing a stress ball during a surgical procedure allows patients to have direct control over the object, enhancing their feelings of empowerment. In this way, it positively impacts anxiety and patient satisfaction without interfering with the surgical process. In the study by Yanes et al., the effects of the stress ball and hand-holding on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction were evaluated during skin cancer surgery performed under local anesthesia. Although anxiety was observed to decrease in all groups, no significant difference was found between the groups regarding pain and anxiety. It was noted that nearly all participants were very satisfied. The use of the stress ball appears to help reduce anxiety in anxious patients prior to the procedure. In a study conducted by Kasar et al. on hemodialysis patients, the effects of stress ball usage on stress, vital signs, and comfort levels were investigated. While the use of the stress ball did not affect vital signs and comfort, it demonstrated a positive impact on stress. In a study investigating the effects of distraction methods used during cystoscopy on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction, it was found that anxiety levels post-procedure were lower in the intervention groups (music, video, and stress ball) compared to the control group, while satisfaction levels were higher . Another randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of three different non-pharmacological methods (coughing technique, spirometer blowing, and squeezing a stress ball) in reducing pain during intravenous catheterization. It was reported that the average pain levels in the coughing, spirometer, and stress ball groups were lower compared to the control group . In a study examining the effectiveness of distraction methods for pain and anxiety management during invasive venous surgical procedures, it was indicated that pain and anxiety levels were significantly lower in the interaction with nurses and stress ball group . In a study on managing dental anxiety with the application of a stress ball, no significant difference was found between the anxiety scores of patients who used the stress ball and those who did not. Similarly, in another study investigating the effects of distraction methods during lithotripsy, no significant difference was observed in pain and anxiety scores between the control and intervention groups (music and stress ball) .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Atakum/Samsun
      • Samsun, Atakum/Samsun, Turkey, 55200
        • Seval Ulubay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Will be applied to patients who are over 18 years old. Have no hearing or vision problems. Can read and write, and can communicate effectively.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients under 18 years of age. Patients with communication problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stress Ball Impact on Post-Transurethral Resection Recovery.
Participants will use stress balls regularly, and outcomes such as physical strength, pain levels, and psychological well-being will be assessed to evaluate the intervention's impact.
The effect of the stress ball applied after surgery on patients' recovery quality will be evaluated.
Other Names:
  • To examine the effects of the stress ball after surgery.
Experimental: The effect of the stress ball on patients' discharge time.
This arm of the study examines how the use of stress balls during recovery affects the length of hospital stay and discharge time for patients
The effect of the stress ball applied after surgery on patients' recovery quality will be evaluated.
Other Names:
  • To examine the effects of the stress ball after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of the method used on post-surgery recovery quality
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The primary outcome measure for this study will be the overall quality of post-surgery recovery, assessed through standardized questionnaires evaluating functional mobility, and patient satisfaction
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of the stress ball applied after surgery on patients' discharge time will be evaluated.
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The primary outcome measure will be the difference in discharge times between patients who used stress balls post-surgery and those who did not.
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SEVAL ULUBAY, PHD, Samsun Gazi State Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This IPD Sharing Plan investigates the impact of stress ball application on recovery quality and hospital discharge time after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Conducted by the Department of Urology at a University Hospital, it involves researchers, data analysts, and patients in intervention and control groups. The plan outlines clear roles, promotes collaboration, and ensures equitable sharing of findings. Weekly meetings and regular reports will facilitate communication, while performance metrics will assess recovery outcomes. Ongoing training will enhance ethical standards and data collection, aiming to optimize patient recovery through transparent stakeholder collaboration.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

24 WEEKS

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The access criteria for this study on stress ball application post-TURP establish clear inclusion and exclusion guidelines. Eligible participants are adult males aged 50 and older with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who can provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria include prior prostate surgeries, severe comorbidities, cognitive impairments, and allergies to stress ball materials. Data access is limited to the research team and the Clinical Ethics Committee to ensure ethical oversight and confidentiality through data anonymization. Participants may withdraw at any time without penalty. Collected data will be securely stored, with compliance monitored to uphold ethical standards and protect patient confidentiality during the evaluation of the stress ball application's effectiveness.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on The Effect of Stress Ball Application After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Patients' Recovery Quality and Hospital Discharge Time

Subscribe