Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Ultrasound Surveillance for Liver Cancer dETection in People at High Risk of Developing Liver Cancer (AMULET)

September 17, 2025 updated by: University of Oxford

Aim: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans without contrast to help improve diagnosis of liver cancer in people who are at increased risk of developing liver cancer.

Background: People with any condition that affects the liver over a long period of time can develop cirrhosis. Conditions and risk factors that can lead to cirrhosis include alcohol excess, liver steatosis (lipid or fat accumulation in the liver) and infection with the viruses hepatitis B and C. One of the concerns about people with cirrhosis is that they are at increased risk of developing liver cancer. People with cirrhosis are recommended to have an ultrasound scan (USS) every 6 months (surveillance for liver cancer) so that if a cancer develops, it is diagnosed at an early stage when it can be cured. However, ultrasound can miss cancers even in people having scans every 6 months. Furthermore, the risk of cancer is not alike among people with cirrhosis. For example, people with more advanced cirrhosis and those with cirrhosis from hepatitis B are at higher risk. It is therefore possible that better tests than ultrasound are needed for people with cirrhosis who are at particularly high risk of developing cancer.

Computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans with dye injection (contrast) are used for liver cancer diagnosis. However, they cannot be done every 6 months because of costs, capacity and toxicity from high CT radiation doses, and MRI contrast build-up in the brain with repeated MRI contrast injections. MRI scans without contrast are not toxic, could be done in 20 minutes and are cheaper, so could be done every 6 months. In the experience of the study investigators, MRI without contrast may raise suspicion of liver cancer in cases missed by ultrasound, so it could be used for surveillance instead of ultrasound. This study aims to find out if it is feasible to use a quick MRI (20 minutes) without contrast as surveillance for liver cancer in people at high risk of liver cancer due to liver cirrhosis and to compare this MRI with ultrasound.

Design and Methods: The investigators will recruit 300 people at higher risk of developing liver cancer because of cirrhosis. Study participants will have an ultrasound scan every 6 months as they would in their standard clinical care and an additional 6 monthly non-contrast MRI scan for 30 months (6 visits). If the ultrasound or non-contrast MRI raises concern for a possible liver cancer, an MRI scan with contrast (with dye injection) will be done for definitive diagnosis. All participants will have an MRI with contrast at the end of 30 months (M30) to ensure that no cancers were missed. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to measure quality of life, anxiety, and their experience of MRI and ultrasound scans and data will be collected from their medical notes. The number of liver cancers detected by ultrasound will be compared to the number detected by the non-contrast MRI scans.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Bournemouth University Hospital
    • Oxon
      • Oxford, Oxon, United Kingdom, ox3 9du
        • Recruiting
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trudt
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Pavides, DPhil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with a high risk of HCC will be included. Participants will have liver cirrhosis from Alcohol related liver disease, metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease, chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B or genetic haemochromatosis, or with chronic liver disease and prior successful treatment for HCC without recurrence and who are back in surveillance with USS.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study AND

    • All genders, aged 18 years or above AND
    • Eligible for HCC US surveillance in the opinion of the local investigators AND
    • Child Pugh score A or B AND
    • Diagnosed with liver cirrhosis due to ArLD, MASLD, chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B, genetic haemochromatosis AND
    • Have an annual risk of HCC of at least 3% as determined by the aMAP score OR
    • Participants with chronic liver disease (with or without cirrhosis) who had successful treatment for HCC, have not had a recurrence and have returned to 6 monthly surveillance with USS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Contraindication to MRI

    • Known allergy / reaction to intravenous gadolinium contrast
    • Prisoners
    • Pregnancy or breast feeding
    • Previous liver transplant
    • Participants who are known to have indeterminate liver nodules on prior imaging requiring ongoing follow-up with MRI or CT
    • Previous HCC treated with curative intent and still being followed up with CT or MRI with contrast for possible recurrence
    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min/1.73m2
    • Participant is on haemodialysis
    • Participants who are unlikely to comply with the study procedures in the opinion of the local investigator
    • In the view of the clinician, if the participant has a co-morbidity likely to lead to death within the following 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
non contrast MRI AND standard of care USS
Participants undergo ultrasound every 6 months as per routine clinical care. In addition they undergo research non-contrast enhanced MRI at the same 6 monthly intervals
6 monthly non contrast enhance MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance for HCC
Time Frame: from enrolment to 30 months
True positive tests for HCC per round of surveillance False positive tests for HCC per round of surveillance Positive predictive value for HCC per round of surveillance True negative tests for HCC over the 30 months of surveillance False negative tests for HCC over the 30 months of surveillance Sensitivity and specificity of nceMRI and USS for HCC over 30 months of surveillance
from enrolment to 30 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stage and size of HCC at diagnosis
Time Frame: from enrolment to 30 months

Numbers of HCC detected by nceMRI and USS at a very early, early, intermediate or advanced stage as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.

The number and size of HCC tumours per participant with HCC The number of new indeterminate lesions identified at each surveillance round

from enrolment to 30 months
proportion of participants that receive treatment with curative intent
Time Frame: from enrolment to 30 months
Proportion of participants diagnosed with HCC who go on to receive treatment with curative intent
from enrolment to 30 months
Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: from enrolment to 30 months
Results of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire
from enrolment to 30 months
participant experience
Time Frame: baseline, and month 24
Results of participant experience questionnaire
baseline, and month 24
multivariate models
Time Frame: month 30
Sensitivity and specificity of multivariable models for the diagnosis of HCC
month 30
mechanistic sub-study quantitative MRI metrics
Time Frame: from baseline to months 30
Quantitative variables extracted from MRI data; T1 (ms), R2* (ms), PDFF (%), ADC (mm2/s)
from baseline to months 30
long term outcomes
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after the last study MRI scan is performed
A composite end point including the outcomes of: all cause mortality, liver related mortality, liver decompensation (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), hepatocellular cancer, non primary liver cancer, liver transplantation.
Up to 10 years after the last study MRI scan is performed
number of unused appointments
Time Frame: from enrolment to 30 months
We will count how many appointments for HCC surveillance are unused due to appointments that are missed by participants or cancelled buy the health care provider, or due to participants being lost to follow-up or participants where HCC surveillance is no longer indicated.
from enrolment to 30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2039

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised data may be shared with global academic, commercial or other collaborators after analysis and publication of results, which is expected to be after the end of the study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on non contrast enhanced MRI

Subscribe