The Apollo Device in Systemic Sclerosis for the Management of fatiguE, Raynaud Phenomenon and qualiTy of Life (ASScERT-QoL)

January 7, 2026 updated by: Robyn T. Domsic, MD, MPH

A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of the Apollo Device in Systemic Sclerosis for the Management of fatiguE, Raynaud Phenomenon and qualiTy of Life (ASScERT-QoL)

The purpose of this study it to test the efficacy of a wearable device to improve symptom management and maximize qualify of life in systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients in a randomized trial. Specifically, we will evaluate if the Apollo Neuro device may improve the two specific symptoms highest ranked by patients as affecting qualify of life (fatigue, Raynaud phenomenon) as co-primary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune disease that is characterized by progressive vasculopathy, excessive fibrosis, and immune system activation. Fatigue in SSc is common and greatly impacts quality of life: The prevalence of fatigue in SSc patients is significantly higher than the general population. Raynaud phenomenon (RP) in SSc is not only the most common SSc manifestation, affecting nearly all but is often the earliest SSc symptom. SSc-RP is the highest ranked SSc-related symptom affecting quality of life, and is a major cause of SSc-related morbidity. There are currently no approved medications to treat RP, SSc-associated RP phenomenon or fatigue in SSc. Thus, a non-pharmacologic intervention has the potential to provide SSc patients with a new treatment modality without common limiting side effects, and access. The Apollo wearable provides transcutaneous vibratory stimulation, and can be worn on the wrist or ankle.

Goal: To recruit 160 SSc patient participants into this randomized, sham-device controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive the Apollo vs. sham wearable, which they will wear daily for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures focus on quality-of-life.

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Robyn T Domsic, MD
  • Phone Number: 412-647-6700
  • Email: rtd4@pitt.edu

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Recruiting
        • DelRicht Research Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lesley Saketkoo, MD MPH
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dinesh Khanna, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Scleroderma Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robyn T Domsic, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Recruiting
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tracy Frech, MD MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Ability to provide written informed consent,
  3. Diagnosis of SSc, as defined by the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification of SSc64 with a positive ANA
  4. Baseline score ≥55 on the FACIT-Fatigue scale,
  5. Presence of Raynaud phenomenon with ASRAP-SF severity of T-score ≥40,
  6. Steady daily doses and any immunosuppressive medication, vasodilators or other medications used to treat pulmonary hypertension, antidepressants and anxiolytic use for 4 weeks prior to baseline
  7. Currently owns and operates an iOS or Android smart phone regularly
  8. Ability to comply with the clinical visits schedule and the study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of sympathectomy or stellate ganglion block
  2. History of Botox injections to the digits within the last 3 months
  3. Diabetes mellitus
  4. Major surgery within 8 weeks
  5. Hospitalization for any reason within four weeks of the study baseline visit
  6. Active malignancy
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women,
  8. End-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73m2) or on dialysis,
  9. Hepatic insufficiency as defined by function worse than Child-Pugh Class B
  10. Medication exclusions:

    1. actively prescribed standing doses of beta-blockers,
    2. actively prescribed standing doses of sedatives, hypnotics, opioids, benzodiazepines or anti-psychotic medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Apollo Neuro Device
The Apollo Neuro wearable device is an Apple Watch-sized wearable device that delivers vibration at set frequencies , termed transcutaneous vibratory stimulation, or TVS. These low volume sound waves feel like a soothing touch to the skin (TVS) and activate touch receptors. Apollo is controlled via smartphone and worn on the wrist or ankle. The Apollo is fitted with an adjustable band, made of a durable neoprene material with polyester overlays. Participants are asked to wear it daily for a minimum time period for 6 weeks. Users can choose from different modes of vibration, with some being energizing, others relaxing.
Sham Comparator: Sham Device
Study participants will be randomized 1:1 (Apollo Neuro device : Sham device) Devices are identical; however, the sham device will be set to a frequency that has no therapeutic benefits.
The Apollo Neuro is an Apple Watch-sized wearable device that delivers vibration, termed transcutaneous vibratory stimulation, or TVS. The sham device is identical in appearance to the active intervention, but provides a lower frequency vibration that has no known therapeutic benefit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks
The PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) SF v1.0 Fatigue 13a scale. This is a13-item, patient reported measure of an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The raw score is converted to a T-score for analysis with 50 for the mean and a standard deviation of 10.
Baseline, 6 Weeks
Change in average weekly Raynaud attacks
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks
Average number of weekly Raynaud attacks. Over a period of one week, patients will record their Raynaud phenomenon (RP) attack frequency via a smartphone app. The Raynaud app is usable on both Apple iPhones and Android phones.
Baseline, 6 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: baseline up to week 6
The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L will be used. The quality-of-life assessment instrument has 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression plus a patient global assessment visual analog scale (VAS). In the EQ-5D-5L each dimension is ranked on 5 levels of severity. Full health is a score of 1 and values below zero are regarded as a state worse than death.
baseline up to week 6
Change in Raynaud phenomenon symptom severity
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
The ASRAP (Assessment of Scleroderma-associated RAynaud's Phenomenon) Questionnaire Short form is a 10-item patient self-report questionnaire regarding symptoms over the last week. Raw scores are converted to T-score with a median of 50.
baseline to week 6
Change in the Raynaud Condition Score
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
The Raynaud Condition Score is a patient-reported outcome of a single question regarding Raynaud severity. It is a visual analog scale with a results range of 0-100. A score of 0 is no symptoms, and 100 is severe symptoms. It is recommended by OMERACT for assessment of Raynaud phenomenon.
baseline to week 6
Change Sleep
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 6
PROMIS® Sleep disturbance short form 4a will be used. This 4-item questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale for responses, inquiring about symptoms over the last week. Raw scores are converted to T-scores, with a mean of 50 and SD of 10.
change from baseline to week 6
Change in pain
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
We will use the PROMIS pain interference (v1.1- Short Form 4a) questionnaire which poses 4 questions regarding the last week of pain symptoms. Responses are in a 5-point likert scale from not at all to very much. Raw scores are converted to T-scores for analysis with a median of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
baseline to week 6
Change in depression
Time Frame: change baseline to week 6
Depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). These 8 questions are responded to with a Likert scale of 0(never) up to 3 (always) with a score range of 0-27.
change baseline to week 6
Change in Social Function
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
Captured using PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 4a. This is a 4-question survey, with respondents answering a 5-point likert scale from 'never' to 'always'. Raw scores are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
baseline to week 6
Change in dysautonomia symptoms
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
Change in dysautonomia symptoms as measured with the COMPASS-31 scale. This is a 31-question instrument which includes six domains: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder and pupillomotor . A higher score indicates worse autonomic function. Following appropriate weighting, this instrument provides an autonomic symptom score from 0 to 100.
baseline to week 6
Change in pain intensity
Time Frame: baseline to week 6
PROMIS® Numeric Rating Scale v.1.0 - Pain Intensity 1a will be used. This is a single question inquiring about pain in the last week, rating from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
baseline to week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robyn T Domsic, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Requests for IPD can be obtained by emailing the PI of the study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after the study has been completed and published

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

We will comply with the CDMRP policy for data sharing, while also complying with all pertinent local, state, and federal regulations. All individuals requesting the data sets will be required to enter into a data share agreement that: (1) acknowledges that the data will be stripped of any identifying markers, (2) acknowledge the data will only be utilized for research purposes, and (3) assure that the requesting investigator will destroy the raw data when the research is completed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe