- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06675552
Non-interventional Study on Guideline Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure (HF) in Germany (PHRASE-HF)
June 18, 2026 updated by: AstraZeneca
PHenotype-based RApid SEquencing of Guideline-directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (PHRASE-HF): A Multicentre, Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Examine Outcomes of Rapid In-hospital Implementation of GDMT and Its Translation From Discharge Into Routine Care
Heart failure (HF) is a global public health issue that affects more than 63 million people worldwide.
The clinical and economic burden of HF on health care systems is substantial.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents approximately 50% of the HF patient population.The burden of HF is expected to increase substantially as the population ages, and despite improvements in treatment, hospitalisation and mortality rates remain especially high in HFrEF patients.
The current guideline recommendation of directed medical therapy for HFrEF combines four drug classes with proven prognostic benefit: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)/angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE I)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), betablockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).
The 2023 ESC (European Society of Cardiology) HF guideline update additionally recommends a rapid in-hospital sequencing approach of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with frequent physician visits during the first 6 weeks post discharge.
Studies investigating the implementation of GDMT in a real-world setting have shown that a significant proportion of patients did not receive the recommended drug combination therapy.
Delayed initiation of GDMT contributes to the low number of patients receiving guideline concordant HFrEF therapy, which ultimately may affect patient outcomes.
One approach to implement the 2023 ESC guideline updates for heart failure treatment regarding early in-hospital initiation and rapid up-titration of GDMT could be to provide specific training on GDMT recommendations.
Such a standardised training is offered to the physicians treating HF patients within selected hospitals of the German Helios hospital network (Helios-GDMT-program).
Evidence is needed in order to assess whether in-hospital initiation and up-titration of all phenotype concordant classes of GDMT at hospital discharge can be observed after standardised physician training and whether the GDMT-program implementation also translates into real-world routine outpatient care with respect to use of GDMT and clinical outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Detailed Description
The overall aim of PHRASE-HF is to evaluate the use of GDMT at hospital discharge, the translation of in-hospital implementation and possible maximisation of phenotype-based GDMT into real-world routine outpatient care, HF symptoms, patient reported outcomes (PROs), clinically relevant outcomes (e.g.
rehospitalisation, mortality), use of diuretics and concomitant drug classes in patients admitted for in-hospital treatment of HFrEF to sites trained within the Helios-GDMT-program.
The analyses will primarily be done in a total study population, and as defined by exploratory objectives in subgroups of interest.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
438
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
- Phone Number: 1-877-240-9479
- Email: information.center@astrazeneca.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13125
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
Erfurt, Germany, 99089
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
Gifhorn, Germany, 38518
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04289
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
Schwerin, Germany, 19049
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
Wuppertal, Germany, 42117
- Recruiting
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Approximately 438 patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted for in-hospital treatment with a maximum of 2 of the indicated guideline recommended drug classes (ACE-I/ARNI/ARB, BB, MRA, SGLT2i) in the current medication plan are planned to be enrolled consecutively.
Recruitment will take place at 5-7 inpatient cardiology departments at Helios hospitals trained by Helios-GDMT-Program throughout Germany.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years at the time of signing the informed consent
- Hospitalised in a participating site and receiving full inpatient treatment (at least 24h hospital stay)
- Diagnosis of HFrEF according to the current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with a left ventricular EF of ≤40% (as measured per echocardiography during the index hospital stay or within 3 months prior to index hospitalisation with available reports from imaging (ejection fraction) at the time of study inclusion)
- Treated with a maximum of 2 of the indicated drug classes (ACE-I/ARNI/ARB, BB, MRA, SGLT2i) according to guideline recommendation (GDMT) at admission.
- Signed and dated written informed consent prior to enrolment in the study
- Willing and capable to fulfil requirements listed in the ICF
Exclusion Criteria:
- Initial presentation (index hospitalisation) in cardiogenic shock or other kinds of shock
- Status post heart transplantation
- History of intolerance to one or more GDMT drug classes (ACE-I/ARNI/ARB, BB, MRA, SGLT2i) or significant side effects that led to the discontinuation of two or more substances within one drug class (except from ACE-I/ARB, e.g., if 2 different ACE inhibitors triggered cough, but sartans are tolerated, then the patient is not excluded)
- Current or planned participation in a clinical trial
- Decision by the investigator that the participant should not participate in the study if the participant is unlikely to comply with study procedures
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients treated with HFrEF GDMT
Time Frame: Baseline to hospital discharge, on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline
|
Proportion of patients treated with phenotype-concordant guideline-recommended HF drug classes and the corresponding doses as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to hospital discharge, on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of recommended HF-drug classes
Time Frame: Baseline to hospital discharge, on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline
|
The HF-drug classes including the corresponding doses that are recommended in discharge letter at hospital discharge
|
Baseline to hospital discharge, on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline
|
|
Change of percentage in HFrEF GDMT
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
The percentage of patients who are newly initiated on guideline-directed HFrEF medical therapy
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change of phenotype-concordant guideline-recommended HF drug classes
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
The number of patients with change in phenotype-concordant guideline- recommended HF drug classes
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
|
Reasons for GDMT adjustments
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
The reasons for guideline-directed medical therapy changes as noted in patients electronic medical records will be described as the number and proportion of patients who experienced adjustment in guideline-directed medical therapy according to each reasons presented
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
|
Reasons for not having guideline-recommended drug classes or doses
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
The reasons for not having maximal phenotype-concordant guideline-recommended HF drug classes as noted in patients electronic medical records will be described as the number and proportion of patients who are not having maximal GDMT drug classes according to each reasons presented
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
|
Number of outpatient post-discharge visits
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 3 months
|
The number of outpatient visits for heart failure treatment within the first three months after hospital discharge
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients conducting post-discharge visits
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 3 months
|
Proportion of patients conducting post-discharge visits for heart failure treatment within the first three months after hospital discharge
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 3 months
|
|
Absolute change from baseline in NYHA class
Time Frame: Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
The NYHA classification is a regimen for the classification of heart failure into certain stages according to clearly defined criteria.
Treatment of heart failure is usually based on the NYHA classification.
Symptoms used to evaluate the stages include dyspnea, nocturia at night, cyanosis, general weakness and fatigue, angina pectoris or cold extremities, edema.
NYHA-I: No limitation on resilience.
Complete absence of symptoms or signs of exertion when heart disease is diagnosed; NYHA-II: Slight decrease in endurance.
Freedom from discomfort during rest and with mild exertion, occurrence of symptoms with increased stress; NYHA-III: Severe limitation of resilience.
Freedom from discomfort at rest, occurrence of symptoms even with mild exertion; NYHA-IV: Permanent symptoms, even during rest.
|
Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients blood pressure as noted in patients electronic medical records /
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in heart rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients heart rate as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in electrolyte level
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients electrolyte level as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in potassium level
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients potassium level as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in estimated glomerular filtrations rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients estimated glomerular filtration rate as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in serum creatinine concentration
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Changes in patients serum creatinine concentration as noted in patients electronic medical records
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Number of rehospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
The number of patients being rehospitalized for heart failure within the observational period
|
Hospital Discharge (on average 6 days after hospitalization/baseline) to 12 months
|
|
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Number of patients who died during the observational period
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
CV-specific survival
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
Number of patients who died due to cardiovascular disease during observation period
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Absolute change from baseline in Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS)-5 questionnaire
Time Frame: Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
The MARS-5 is five-item self-report adherence scale which assesses both intentional and non-intentional non-adherence.
Respondents rate the frequency with which the five different medication-taking behaviours occur, scoring each item on a 1-5-point scale with higher scores indicating higher reported adherence.
The MARS-5 has been shown to be reliable and valid across a variety of health conditions, including cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.
Only applicable to Prospective cohort.
|
Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
|
Absolute change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score
Time Frame: Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.
Summary scores will be examined at each assessment point during follow-up.
For each of the assessment periods, descriptive statistics for the observed value, change from baseline and the 95% two-sided confidence interval for the mean change will be presented.
The proportions of participants with overall health status classified as poor, fair, good, and excellent will be examined at each assessment point.
Additionally, the proportions of participants who experience clinically meaningful changes in overall health status: improvement (≥5 point increase), deterioration (≥5 point decrease), and stable (<5 point increase or decrease) will be examined at each assessment point.
Only applicable to Prospective cohort
|
Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
|
Absolute change from baseline in PROMIS Global Health 10
Time Frame: Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
The PROMIS 10 is a validated comprehensive and accessible set of tools used to measure self-reported physical, mental and social health; including symptoms, function and general perceptions of health and wellbeing.
The PROMIS 10 consists of ten items that measure physical health, physical functioning, general mental health, emotional distress, satisfaction with social activities and relationships, ability to carry out usual social activities and roles, pain, fatigue and overall quality of life.
|
Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
|
Absolute change from baseline in the Nine-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
HF is associated with depressive disorders and manifest depressions.
The PHQ-9 that capture depressed mood and anhedonia has been validated as an ultra-brief screening tool with some evidence of responsiveness.
The PHQ-9 score is obtained by adding the score for each question (total points).
A PHQ-9 score ranges from 0-27, to determine whether they meet criteria for a depressive disorder.
|
Measured at 6 and 12 months
|
|
Number of diuretics changes
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
The number of patients who experience a switch in their diuretic medication drug class as noted in patients electronic medical record
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Number of concomitant medication changes
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
|
The number of patients who experience a switch in their concomitant medication drug class as noted in patients electronic medical record
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 4, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
November 5, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 22, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 18, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D1699R00045
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal.
All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles.
For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm/ST/Submission/Disclosure
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
When a request has been approved, AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool.
Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information.
Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access.
For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicJapan, Netherlands, United States, Moldova, Romania
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States