Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Plus Genicular Nerve Block Versus Intraarticular Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Management of Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis.

November 26, 2024 updated by: Omar Hashem Mohammed, Tanta University

A Comparative Study Between Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Plus Genicular Nerve Block Versus Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Management of Chronic Pain in Knee Osteo-arthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

The aim of the present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of combined transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency plus genicular nerve block with bupivacaine plus corticosteroid versus intraarticular Hyaluronic acid injections, in terms of clinical and functional parameters, in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total knee arthroplasty is commonly used as a surgical option for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and improve function, although it is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly in older patients with co morbidities. Despite high success rates after total knee arthroplasty , a significant number of patients report suffering from postoperative pain, which can be worse than reported preoperative pain.

As an alternative approach, radiofrequency treatment modalities on the knee joint have been used to reduce knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Genicular nerve block (GNB) is a recently developed therapeutic option for knee osteoarthritis. that targets the three sensory nerves of the knee: superior lateral, superior medial and inferior medial genicular nerve, to inhibit pain transmission to the central nervous system.

Early osteoarthritis. treatment combines non pharmacological techniques with oral pharmacological therapies, intraarticular injections (IAI) of hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroid with local anesthetic or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are used in progressive or very symptomatic stage. Intraarticular injections (IAI) is considered one of first-line treatments in recent studies as it is effective in decreasing pain and safer than oral pharmacological therapies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • ElGharbia
      • Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt, 31527
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged above 40 years.
  • Both sexes
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)physical status I and II.
  • Patients radiologically proven symptomatic knee joint osteoarthritis not responding to medical treatment.
  • Patients with knee pain of moderate or greater intensity on most or all days for ≥ 3 months, showing significant radiological osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 to 3).

Radiological severity was assessed using the Kellgrenand Lawrence global scale as follow: Grade 0; means absence of radiological finding; grade 1: suspected narrowing of joint space; grade 2 refers to osteophytes and possible narrowing; grade 3 is defined as multiple os-teophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and grade 4 comprises large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients who show improvement on medical treatment, patients on an oral, topical, or intra-articular steroid during the 4 weeks before the study; patients with an oral, topical, or suppository non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 2 weeks before the study.
  • Patients having secondary knee osteoarthritis.
  • Patients with severe osteoarthritis.(K/L grade >3) in a location other than the knee joint.
  • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Patients with joint replacement surgery in either knee and/or a hip.
  • Patients with meniscal tear, ligament injury, bursitis, and popliteal cyst and blood investigations suggestive of any infection.
  • Morbid obese patients (body mass index (BMI) of >40 kg/m2)
  • Infection at site of injection.
  • Bleeding diathesis and coagulopathy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hyaluronic Acid group
Patients underwent intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection.
Patients underwent intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection.
Experimental: Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency group
Patients underwent transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency application plus genicular nerve block.
Patients underwent transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency application plus genicular nerve block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 3 month after injection

Assessment of pain severity by visual analog scale (VAS) at the baseline (before injection), 1month and 3month, intervals after injection.

The visual analog scale (VAS) score it has 10-cm scale that represents a continuum between "0 = no pain" and "10 = worst pain."

3 month after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status
Time Frame: 3 month after injection

Functional status and daily activity via the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoartheritis index (WOMAC) score before one month and three monthes after injection.

The WOMAC consists of three subscales: pain (five questions), stiffness (two questions), and physical function (17 questions). The subscale scores can vary, with pain ranging from 0 to 20 points; stiffness, 0 to 8 points; and physical function, 0 to 68 points. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

3 month after injection
Daily activity
Time Frame: 3 month after injection

Daily activity via the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoartheritis index (WOMAC) score before one month and three monthes after injection.

The WOMAC consists of three subscales: pain (five questions), stiffness (two questions), and physical function (17 questions). The subscale scores can vary, with pain ranging from 0 to 20 points; stiffness, 0 to 8 points; and physical function, 0 to 68 points. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

3 month after injection
Analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 3 month after injection

Analgesic requirement (Dose and frequency of oral acetaminophen intake) for post injection pain if visual analogue scale (VAS) more than 3.

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) used as an effective tool to detect intensity of pain was recorded;"0" represents no pain,"10" worst pain, "1-3" mild pain,"4-6 " moderate pain and" 7-10 " severe pain

3 month after injection
Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 month after injection
Adverse events were recorded such as toxicity of local anesthetic drug occur, the research was stopped and was cleared to ehtical committees.
3 month after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data was available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data was available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe