Validation of a Machine Learning Model Based on MR for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer

Validation of a Machine Learning Model Based on Multiparametric MR for the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

The goal of this observational study is to validate a clinically significant predictive machine learning model based on the processing of images RMmp (Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging). To be validated the model should be evaluated on:

  • Specificity (SP): is the probability of a negative test result, conditioned on the individual truly being negative
  • Sensitivity (SN): is the probability of a positive test result, conditioned on the individual truly being positive

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a transversal, non-interventional observation study that involves the analysis of data collected both retrospectively and prospectively.

Patients will be enrolled by the radiologist medical staff designated by the Principal Investigator. The Principal Investigator and his delegates will be responsible for the acquisition and pseudo-anonymization of images of patients enrolled (both retrospectively and prospectively) from the RIS-PACS of the IRCCS Bologna University Hospital, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola. When available, for the participants undergoing prostate surgery, the O.U. of Pathological Anatomy will provide digital scans of the prostatic macrosections.

For the validation of the machine learning model of clinically significant CaP, a tool will be made available to radiologists. This tool is developed by the Department of Informatics - Science and Engineering, DISI, University of Bologna and Alma Mater Research Institute on Global Challenges and Climate Change, Alma Climate, University of Bologna, and integrated in an open-source Dicom viewer, Aliza MS Dicom Viewer. The doctors will then have the possibility to carry out independently the segmentation of the ADC sequences (previously pseudo-anonymized) and start the radiomic process to obtain a predictive value of the probability that the segmented lesion is clinically significant. This probability value will be calculated by the software on the basis of the machine learning model developed in PROSTATE_01. The tool also allows data collection (organized and pseudo-anonymous). The validation of the clinically significant predictive model of CaP will be carried out on all patients enrolled both retrospectively and prospectively, excluding those used in the model training phase in PROSTATE_01. After having evaluated the performance of the validated model and the effects of selection bias, once the recruitment is completed both retrospectively and prospectively, a refinement of the previously developed model will be carried out. This will be a "re-training" of the model itself, performed on training and test datasets randomly selected from the entire enrolled population from which it will be obtained randomly, by difference, also the subset for a new validation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include participants who have performed an MMR at the U.O.C. Radiology Addomino-Pelvic Diagnostic and Interventional of the IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna, Sant'Orsola Polyclinic and a TRUS biopsy with fusion technique with RMmp of the prostate. The retrospective enrollment refers to the period between 15 September 2015 (date start of TRUS biopsy with fusion technique with RMmp at the Policlinico di Sant'Orsola) and the date of approval of this study. The prospective enrollment refers to the period of time from the study approval until the following 3 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 18 at the time of examination
  • Obtaining informed consent
  • Presence of one or more lesions classified as PI-RADSv2.1 ≥ 1 at a prostate RMmp at the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria in Bologna
  • Indication for TRUS biopsy by fusion technique integrated with systematic biopsy at the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria in Bologna

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous prostate surgery or hormone therapy
  • Technically sub-optimal investigations for the presence of artifacts (hip prosthesis, movement of the endorectal probe, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity (SP)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
Specificity is the probability of obtaining a negative classification or that the disease is indeed absent.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
Sensitivity (SN)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
Sensitivity is the probability of a positive classification or that the disease is actually present.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
It is the ratio of patients truly diagnosed as positive to all those who had positive test results (including healthy subjects who were incorrectly diagnosed as patient).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
It is the ratio of subjects truly diagnosed as negative to all those who had negative test results (including patients who were incorrectly diagnosed as healthy).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caterina Gaudiano, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Subscribe