Promoting Mother-baby Bonding Through Sustainable Breastfeeding Practices

January 18, 2026 updated by: Leyla Kaya, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Promoting Mother-baby Bonding Through Sustainable Breastfeeding Practices: A Green Mom Approach

This research aimed to identify sustainable breastfeeding practices and green mothers' initiatives to develop a strong mother-child bond.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This research aimed to identify sustainable breastfeeding practices and green mothers' initiatives to develop a strong mother-child bond.

The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1. 9.7 software (Faul et al., 2007), the effect size was determined to be Cohen's d=0.9780770. Statistical power analysis was performed according to A Priori: Calculate required sample size (Means: Difference between two independent means (two groups)), 95% power (1-β) and α=0.05, and given these parameters it was concluded that a sample size of at least 58 participants was required for the study in question. In the event of data loss, a 20% increase in the sample size was expected as a result of statistical advice. Accordingly, it was planned to conduct the study with a total of n=70 people, n=35 in the intervention group and n=35 in the control group.

It was carried out with the participation of two groups. The green mother education group received 4 training sessions of 60 minutes each. The control group received routine hospital care but no other intervention during this period.

Data for the study were collected by the researcher using face-to-face interviews, a personal information form with demographic questions, and the measurement tools used in the study. The training was completed after 4 weeks. After the training, the measurement tools were used for the woman's postpartum period.

The participants were given an explanation of the green motherhood education and told how, for how long, and where the training would take place. The face-to-face green motherhood education programme was completed by the participants in a specific way for each session (nutrition, breastfeeding, environmental awareness and bonding). The training was delivered using a poster.

Green motherhood education was delivered in this way in 4 sessions. The measurement tools were given to the participants again on the 1st day, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month after birth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women 24 weeks gestation
  • Must be between 18 and 35 years of age.
  • Women must provide informed consent to participate in the study, indicating their willingness to participate in the educational intervention and assessments.
  • Attend educational sessions
  • Pregnant primiparous

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with significant medical conditions that may affect breastfeeding or nutrition (e.g. serious mental illness, chronic disease) will be excluded.
  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Previous GREEN MOTHER training
  • Substance abuse
  • Women considered to be at high risk of non-compliance with the study protocol (e.g. those with unstable living conditions).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Green motherhood education

Pregnant women selected for the experimental group will receive 4 weeks of green motherhood training.

The programme, which includes breastfeeding, bonding and carbon footprint training, is delivered 4 times by researchers.

The training content has been prepared by the researchers by scanning the literature. The training will be delivered using posters.

Pregnant women selected for the experimental group will receive 4 weeks of green motherhood training.
No Intervention: Standard of care
Women in the control group receive routine care at the same hospital's polyclinics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors scale
Time Frame: Participants immediately after group assignment, 6 months after the birth

The Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviours scale consists of 32 items and seven sub-dimensions. Quality labels (local and organic), seasonal food and avoiding food waste, animal health, reducing meat consumption, healthy and balanced diet, local food, low fat. Participants are asked to rate each item as 'never', 'very rarely', 'rarely', 'sometimes', 'often', 'very often' or 'always'. Never' is worth 1 point and 'always' is worth 7 points. Factor scores are calculated by taking the average of the scores given to the items in that factor (between 1 and 7 points). Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.912.

The lowest possible score is 32 and the highest is 224. This reflects high sustainability.

Participants immediately after group assignment, 6 months after the birth
Carbon Footprint Awareness Scale
Time Frame: Participants immediately after group assignment, 6 months after the birth
The scale comprises 19 items measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale, focusing on five key areas: transportation, which includes 3 items; fuel consumption, also with 3 items; electricity use, featuring 5 items; food consumption, containing 5 items; and waste management, which has 3 items. The scale demonstrates a strong factor structure, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, indicating high reliability, and it explains 56.09% of the variance in the data. The lowest score is 19 and the highest is 95. High scores indicate sustainability.
Participants immediately after group assignment, 6 months after the birth
Depression Anxiety and Stress scales-21
Time Frame: Participants immediately after group assignment, 1st day after delivery, 3rd month after delivery, 6th month after delivery
This 21-item scale consists of three dimensions, namely anxiety, depression, and stress. Items are measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always). A higher sum score indicates more severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Participants immediately after group assignment, 1st day after delivery, 3rd month after delivery, 6th month after delivery
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Time Frame: Participants were assigned to the group immediately after birth, 1 day after birth, 3 months after birth and 6 months after birth.
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support is a psychometric tool designed by Zimet et al. 18 and adapted to Turkish by Eker et al. 19 to measure individuals' perceived social support from three sources: "family, friends, and a significant other." This scale comprises 12 items, rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The internal consistency coefficients reported for the scale are within the range of 0.80 to 0.85, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92.
Participants were assigned to the group immediately after birth, 1 day after birth, 3 months after birth and 6 months after birth.
Scale Breast-feeding Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 1st day after birth, 3rd month after birth, 6th month after birth
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale: This is a 33-item scale developed by Dennis (1999). It consists of two sub-dimensions to determine mothers' breastfeeding skills, beliefs and behaviours regarding breastfeeding. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish form of the scale was conducted by Ekşioğlu and Çeber (2011). Breastfeeding self-efficacy was assessed using a five-point Likert scale: (1) I never trust myself, (2) I do not trust myself very much, (3) I trust myself sometimes, (4) I trust myself often, (5) I always trust myself. As the total score on the scale increases, so does breastfeeding self-efficacy. The lowest score is 33 and the highest is 165.
1st day after birth, 3rd month after birth, 6th month after birth
Postpartum Attachment Scale
Time Frame: 1st day after birth, 3rd month after birth, 6th month after birth
The Postpartum Attachment Scale is a mother-filled assessment tool that utilizes a six-point Likert scale defined as "always," "very often," "often," "sometimes," "rarely," and "never." This scale consists of 25 items, with some items rated inversely, and scores range from 0 to 5. It is organized into four sub-dimensions: "attachment disorder" with 12 items, "rejection and irritability" with 7 items, "tension about care" with 4 items, and "risk of abuse" with 2 items. The overall cut-off point for the scale is set at 26 points, with a score of 27 or above indicating a postpartum attachment problem. In the original study, the total score had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.75, while the subscales showed varying reliability: 0.62 for attachment disorder, 0.53 for rejection and irritability, 0.40 for anxiety in babysitting, and 0.11 for risk of abuse.
1st day after birth, 3rd month after birth, 6th month after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leyla Kaya, PhD, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
  • Study Director: Esra Keles, PhD, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17.04.2024/43

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe