- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06830109
Nasal Obstruction With Oxymetazoline and Corticosteroids (NORTOC)
Nasal Obstruction Randomized Trial With Oxymetazoline and Corticosteroids
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sara Kukuljan
- Phone Number: 314-362-7563
- Email: kukuljas@wustl.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nyssa Farrell, MD
- Phone Number: 314-362-7509
- Email: nyssa.farrell@wustl.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Recruiting
- Washington University
-
Contact:
- Sara Kukuljan
- Phone Number: 314-362-7563
- Email: kukuljas@wustl.edu
-
Contact:
- Lucas Cruz, BA
- Phone Number: 314-362-0549
- Email: lucascruz@wustl.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- males and females ages 18 years or older
- have a history of nasal obstruction
- have failed a trial of topical steroids (that included at least 1 month of daily use)
- ability to read, write, and understand English
- either do not desire surgery or are poor surgical candidates due to medical comorbidities.
Patients who have had prior use of oxymetazoline or other nasal decongestants are eligible for the study but must have stopped usage 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Must be willing to stop using any other nasal sprays, besides saline, and oral decongestants.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any history of sinonasal mass/tumor
- Any history of nasal polyps
- a known history of chronic sinusitis
- an allergy to oxymetazoline
- or who have any medical contraindication to oxymetazoline use, such as pulmonary hypertension.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: budesonide + oxymetazoline,
alpha-adrenergic agonist and vasoconstrictor that is available over-the-counter (OTC).
|
Intra-nasal alpha-adrenergic agonist and vasoconstrictor that is available over-the-counter (OTC)
Other Names:
Intranasal corticosteroid that is available over-the-counter (OTC)
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: budesonide
intranasal corticosteroid that is available OTC.
|
Intranasal corticosteroid that is available over-the-counter (OTC)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Responders
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The primary outcome measure will be the rate of responders (as a percentage) to the intervention defined as the number of participants reporting 2 (Moderately Improved), or 3 (Much Improved) in the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) assessed after 4 weeks of treatment divided by the total number of participants in each study group. CGI-I asks subjects to rate their overall response to treatment using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from -3 to 3 ("Much Worse" to "Much Improved"). Participants responding 2 (Moderately Improved), or 3 (Much Improved) to the the CGI-I question "Compared to the start of the study, how would you rate your nasal breathing now", will be defined as responders to treatment. |
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
|
SNOT-22 is a 22-question survey designed to measure the physical, functional, and emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis. It contains questions regarding symptoms commonly associated with sinonasal disease. Subjects rate each question by using a 0-5 point scale with 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be. The SNOT-22 total score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 110, with higher scores representing worse outcome. |
baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
|
|
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
|
NOSE is a disease-specific survey designed to measure nasal obstruction.
It consists of 5 questions, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score represents the sum of the raw scores multiplied by 5 and ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse symptoms.
A score of 30 is considered indicative of clinically significant nasal airway obstruction.
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)
Time Frame: baseline, week 4
|
The CGI-Severity Scale from 1 to 7 (1 is "Not Obstructed at All", 7 is "Completely Obstructed") provides the severity of nasal obstruction as perceived from the patient.
Comparison of CGI-S scores at 4 weeks with baseline will help identify subjects that have experienced rebound congestion.
The investigators will report the number of patients who report a worsening of their symptoms, as measured by a 1-point (1 category) increase in CGI-S scale at 4 weeks as compared to CGI-S scale at baseline.
|
baseline, week 4
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S); experimental arm
Time Frame: baseline, week 7
|
The CGI-Severity Scale from 1 to 7 (1 is "Not Obstructed at All", 7 is "Completely Obstructed") provides the severity of nasal obstruction as perceived from the patient.
Comparison of CGI-S scores at 7 weeks with baseline will help identify subjects in the experimental arm who struggled with discontinuation of oxymetazoline.
The investigators will report the number of subjects who report a worsening of their symptoms, as measured by a 2-point (2 categories) increase in CGI-S scale at 7 weeks as compared to CGI-S scale at baseline in the experimental arm only.
|
baseline, week 7
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nyssa F Farrell, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;15(5):358-61. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.344.
- Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x.
- Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
- Scarupa MD, Kaliner MA. Nonallergic rhinitis, with a focus on vasomotor rhinitis: clinical importance, differential diagnosis, and effective treatment recommendations. World Allergy Organ J. 2009 Mar;2(3):20-5. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181990aac.
- Stewart M, Ferguson B, Fromer L. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion. Int J Gen Med. 2010 Apr 8;3:37-45. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s8077.
- Thongngarm T, Assanasen P, Pradubpongsa P, Tantilipikorn P. The effectiveness of oxymetazoline plus intranasal steroid in the treatment of chronic rhinitis: A randomised controlled trial. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2016 Mar;34(1):30-7. doi: 10.12932/AP0649.34.1.2016.
- Calvo-Henriquez C, Viera-Artiles J, Rodriguez-Iglesias M, Rodriguez-Rivas P, Maniaci A, Yanez MM, Martinez-Capoccioni G, Alobid I. The Role of Corticosteroid Nasal Irrigations in the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2023 May 22;12(10):3605. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103605.
- Vaidyanathan S, Williamson P, Clearie K, Khan F, Lipworth B. Fluticasone reverses oxymetazoline-induced tachyphylaxis of response and rebound congestion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul 1;182(1):19-24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1701OC. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
- Graf P, Juto JE. Decongestion effect and rebound swelling of the nasal mucosa during 4-week use of oxymetazoline. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1994 May-Jun;56(3):157-60. doi: 10.1159/000276633.
- Morris S, Eccles R, Martez SJ, Riker DK, Witek TJ. An evaluation of nasal response following different treatment regimes of oxymetazoline with reference to rebound congestion. Am J Rhinol. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(2):109-15. doi: 10.2500/105065897782537197.
- Kumar RS, Jain MK, Kushwaha JS, Patil S, Patil V, Ghatak S, Sanmukhani J, Mittal R. Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate and Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray: A Novel First Fixed Dose Combination for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis with Nasal Congestion. J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Jun 10;15:783-792. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S357288. eCollection 2022.
- Matreja PS, Gupta V, Kaur J, Singh S. Efficacy of fluticasone and oxymetazoline as the treatment for allergic rhinitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(1):85-88.
- Meltzer EO, Bernstein DI, Prenner BM, Berger WE, Shekar T, Teper AA. Mometasone furoate nasal spray plus oxymetazoline nasal spray: short-term efficacy and safety in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):102-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3864.
- Juvekar MR, Vaidya GK, Majumder A, Pendharkar AD, Irudhayarajan A, Kundu A, Ramesh D, Kumar JD, Jagannatha B, Mathew J, Nikam MP, Mehta M, Chawla N, Hajare P, Gowda PGC, Murthy PVLN, Mathew SM, Damle MV, Kant C, Nair AB, Jaiswal A, Mehta RT. A Real-World Observational Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate-Oxymetazoline Fixed Dose Combination Nasal Spray in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis. Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Feb;44(2):123-130. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01338-8. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
- Elwany SS, Stephanos WM. Rhinitis medicamentosa. An experimental histopathological and histochemical study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1983;45(4):187-94. doi: 10.1159/000275642.
- Elwany S, Abdel-Salaam S. Treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa with fluticasone propionate--an experimental study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Mar;258(3):116-9. doi: 10.1007/s004050000309.
- Knipping S, Holzhausen HJ, Goetze G, Riederer A, Bloching MB. Rhinitis medicamentosa: electron microscopic changes of human nasal mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jan;136(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.08.025.
- Lin CY, Cheng PH, Fang SY. Mucosal changes in rhinitis medicamentosa. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004 Feb;113(2):147-51. doi: 10.1177/000348940411300213.
- Cam B, Sari M, Midi A, Gergin O. Xylitol treats nasal mucosa in rhinitis medicamentosa: an experimental rat model study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3123-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05605-3. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
- Suh SH, Chon KM, Min YG, Jeong CH, Hong SH. Effects of topical nasal decongestants on histology of nasal respiratory mucosa in rabbits. Acta Otolaryngol. 1995 Sep;115(5):664-71. doi: 10.3109/00016489509139384.
- Tas A, Yagiz R, Yalcin O, Uzun C, Huseyinova G, Adali MK, Karasalihoglu AR. Use of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa: an experimental study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Apr;132(4):608-12. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.010.
- Tait SD, Kallogjeri D, Chidambaram S, Schneider J, Piccirillo JF. Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the Modified 25-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019 Sep;33(5):577-585. doi: 10.1177/1945892419851622. Epub 2019 May 28. No abstract available.
- Taverner D, Bickford L, Shakib S, Tonkin A. Evaluation of the dose-response relationship for intra-nasal oxymetazoline hydrochloride in normal adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Sep;55(7):509-13. doi: 10.1007/s002280050665.
- Akerlund A, Klint T, Olen L, Rundcrantz H. Nasal decongestant effect of oxymetazoline in the common cold: an objective dose-response study in 106 patients. J Laryngol Otol. 1989 Aug;103(8):743-6. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100109958.
- Druce HM, Ramsey DL, Karnati S, Carr AN. Topical nasal decongestant oxymetazoline (0.05%) provides relief of nasal symptoms for 12 hours. Rhinology. 2018 Dec 1;56(4):343-350. doi: 10.4193/Rhin17.150.
- Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E, Zanotti C, Mireas G, Pavlidis P, Ferfeli M, Hajiioannou J. Endoscopic sinus surgery outcomes in CRS: quality of life and correlations with NOSE scale in a prospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Apr;278(4):1059-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06334-8. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
- Kandathil CK, Saltychev M, Abdelwahab M, Spataro EA, Moubayed SP, Most SP. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jul 12;39(8):837-840. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz070.
- Baroody FM, Brown D, Gavanescu L, DeTineo M, Naclerio RM. Oxymetazoline adds to the effectiveness of fluticasone furoate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;127(4):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Respiration Disorders
- Nose Diseases
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- Airway Obstruction
- Nasal Obstruction
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
- Heterocyclic Compounds
- Azoles
- Polycyclic Compounds
- Imidazoles
- Pregnanes
- Steroids
- Fused-Ring Compounds
- Pregnenediones
- Pregnenes
- Budesonide
- Oxymetazoline
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202406175
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nasal Obstruction
-
BayerCompletedNasal Congestion, Nasal ObstructionCanada
-
Aerin MedicalNot yet recruitingNasal Airway Obstruction
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiCompletedNasal Obstruction Septal Deviation Compensatory Inferior Turbinate HypertrophyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cumhuriyet University HospitalRecruitingNasal Obstruction | Rhinoplasty | Nasal DeformityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Spirair, IncActive, not recruitingNasal Airway Obstruction | Nasal Septal DeviationUnited States
-
Aerin MedicalOhio State UniversityCompletedNasal ObstructionUnited States
-
Aerin MedicalCompletedNasal Airway ObstructionUnited States
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityCompleted
-
Aerin MedicalCompletedNasal ObstructionUnited States
-
Aerin MedicalActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray
-
VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc.TerminatedSocial Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc.Recruiting
-
VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc.Active, not recruitingSocial Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedSocial Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
Alixer Nexgen Therapeutics LimitedRecruitingSeasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)Canada
-
University of ChicagoMcNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, a Division of McNeil-PPC, Inc.Withdrawn
-
Beijing Tongren HospitalUnknownObstructive Sleep ApneaChina
-
Viiral Nordic ABCompleted
-
VivaVision Biotech, IncRecruitingChronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS)China
-
Pamukkale UniversityActive, not recruiting