Study on Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Enhancing Insight

February 12, 2025 updated by: Shanghai Mental Health Center

Targeted Intervention Study of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Impaired Insight in Patients with High-Risk and First-Episode Psychosis

Impaired insight is a key factor in the conversion of high-risk individuals to schizophrenia, but there is a lack of targeted interventions. We found that an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, error-related negativity (ERN), was closely related to impaired insight. The more pronounced the ERN attenuation in patients with high-risk and first-episode psychosis, the more severe the impairement of clinical insight. ERN is a negative potential that appears at the frontal and central scalp electrode locations within 100 ms after an erroneous behavioral response, reflecting the activity of the brain's error-monitoring system. Research has shown that the brain region underlying ERN is partly located in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Other research has reported that the activity extending from the ACC to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is associated with impaired insight in patients with various disorders. Therefore, this project targets mPFC/ACC and uses deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) for targeted modulation, with an exploratory observation of changes in patients' insight before and after neurostimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will be carried out at a single center, the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC).

  1. Modulating ACC Functional Activity Using dTMS to Observe Changes in Insight Among FES and CHR Before and After Intervention This study will employ a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled experimental design. dTMS intervention will be administered for 10 consecutive days, with two sessions per day, ensuring at least a 3-hour interval between sessions. A total of 36 FES participants and 68 CHR participants with impaired insight will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the active-dTMS group or the sham-dTMS group to compare changes in insight between the two conditions. This study will conduct clinical assessments and laboratory testing before and immediately after the intervention. Additionally, clinical assessments will be performed at one month and three months post-intervention to analyze the sustained effects of dTMS in modulating ACC functional activity to improve insight.
  2. Follow-Up of CHR Participants to Analyze the Predictive Role of Insight and ACC Functional Activity on CHR Outcomes A prospective cohort design will be used to compare the transition outcomes among three CHR groups: the active-dTMS group, the sham-dTMS group, and an observational control group. The primary focus is to examine the probability of conversion to schizophrenia at a one-year follow-up and to analyze the extent to which insight and ACC functional activity predict CHR outcomes. 34 CHR participants with intact insight (observational control group) will be recruited for baseline assessments and laboratory testing, followed by a one-year follow-up. By comparing baseline assessments, laboratory indicators, and clinical outcomes between the observational control group and the CHR intervention groups (active-dTMS and sham-dTMS), this study aims to determine whether improvement in insight in the active-dTMS group leads to prognostic outcomes comparable to those of the observational control group. Specifically, it will assess whether the risk of conversion to schizophrenia in the active-dTMS group becomes statistically indistinguishable from that of the observational control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the criteria of clinical high risk for psychosis or meet the DSM-V diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia;
  • Meeting the following definition of impaired insight: below a specific threshold in at least one dimension of the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SAI). Specifically, a score of less than 2 in the "awareness of the need for treatment" dimension, less than 3 in the "recognition of illness" dimension, or less than 2 in the "attribution of psychotic symptoms" dimension qualifies an individual as having impaired insight;
  • Having completed at least six years of primary education;
  • Being able to give informed consent, oral or written. Patients under 18 years old give oral consent and their next of kin or legal guardians give written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in any other clinical intervention research;
  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria of psychotic disorders (including affective disorders);
  • Threshold symptoms are induced by other mental disorders or psychoactive substances;
  • Undergoing anti-psychotic medication for more than 2 weeks;
  • Being diagnosed as organic brain diseases, or severe somatic diseases;
  • Had Experienced traumatic brain injury, and got scores of 7;
  • Dementia, or mental retardation (IQ<70);
  • Being a condition of scalp infection;
  • A pacemaker or other metal implants in the body, pregnancy, or claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: active-CHR
Individuals with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) will be intervened with dTMS.
The dTMS using H-coil with 5Hz stimulate ACC. The sessions of dTMS will be conducted twice daily for 5 consecutive days, and twice sessions of a day will be separated by 3 hours at least.
Sham Comparator: sham-CHR
Individuals with CHR, as a control group, will receive sham stimulation.
The sham-dTMS has the same appearance with the real stimulation coil, which can not generate magnetic field. A sound generator is built in the coil beat to simulate the sound of the real stimulation.
No Intervention: NoI-CHR
For the observation group of CHR, baseline assessments will be conducted, and follow-up outcomes will be observed one year later. Clinical outcomes will be compared with those of the CHR intervention group.
Active Comparator: active-FEP
Patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) will be intervened with dTMS.
The dTMS using H-coil with 5Hz stimulate ACC. The sessions of dTMS will be conducted twice daily for 5 consecutive days, and twice sessions of a day will be separated by 3 hours at least.
Sham Comparator: sham-FEP
FEP patients , as a control group, will receive sham stimulation.
The sham-dTMS has the same appearance with the real stimulation coil, which can not generate magnetic field. A sound generator is built in the coil beat to simulate the sound of the real stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Insight
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Clinical insight will be assessed using the SAI (Schedule for Assessment of Insight). The SAI is a semi-structured interview tool consisting of seven items, with a total score of 14. It evaluates three areas: illness recognition (scoring 0-6), relabeling of symptoms (scoring 0-4), and treatment compliance (scoring 0-4). Patients are considered to have impaired insight if they score less than 3 on illness recognition, less than 2 on relabeling of symptoms, and less than 2 on treatment compliance.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Error-related negativity
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
The error-related negativity (ERN) is observed over frontocentral sites within 100 ms following an error response in behavioral tasks and a reduced ERN indicates reduced error monitoring. EEG epochs were marked with artifacts and excluded from the following ERN analysis if on any electrode, (i) the maximal peak-to-peak amplitude exceeded 100 μV within any moving window (width: 200 ms; step: 50 ms) or (ii) the absolute amplitude exceeded 100 μV at any time point. The calculation for the ERN was based on no fewer than five available epochs with erroneous responses.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Resting-state functional activity of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and its functional connectivity with the whole brain
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Imaging data will be collected on a 3 Tesla Siemens Prisma scanner with a 64-channel Siemens head coil, including structural phase and resting stage detection, which will be used to analyze the functional activity.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Psychopathological symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
This study will also observe the psychopathological symptoms, including positive, negative and general symptoms, using PANSS.The reductive ratio of PANSS points will be calculated after dTMS treatment.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Reality monitoring ability
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Reality monitoring ability refers to distinguish internally self-generated information from externally-derived information. The test will be carried out by the experimental paradigm of reality monitoring ability.The stimulus materials are easy to be accepted and understood by patients with mental illness.The material consisted of 48 pairs of familiar pictures and was divided into two tests, each consisting of a learning and a testing phase. In the learning phase, 24 pictures will be presented with different combinations of conditions (four combinations of "perceptive/imaginative × left/right" conditions). In the testing phase, one object will be presented and the participants will be asked to decide whether the other paired object is perceptive or imaginative, or whether the image is positioned on the left or right side of the screen.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Convertion rate of transition into psychosis
Time Frame: 1-2 year
This study will use SIPS to identify individuals with CHR and assess the participants' clinical outcomes, including transition into psychosis, symptomatic, remission, and other disorders
1-2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jijun Wang, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe