Use of Vibration Anesthesia Device in Intratympanic Injections

March 19, 2025 updated by: Ramazan Akin, Yuzuncu Yıl University

Evaluation of Different Anesthesia Methods to Reduce Pain From Intratympanic Injections: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

SUMMARY Intratympanic injections commonly cause pain in the patients. Intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) application can be performed by direct injection without anesthesia or with local anesthesia induced by lidocaine spray, lidocaine injection, topical phenol, pantocaine, EMLA cream (lidocaine+prilocaine) or vibration anesthesia device (VAD). The advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

ABSTRACT In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of four methods including topical lidocaine spray, local anesthetic cream, vibration anesthesia device (VAD), and saline drops (control group) in the reduction of pain after intratympanic steroid injections (ITS's) and to demonstrate the effectiveness of VAD use. The prospective study included 40 patients aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • VAN, Turkey, 65000
        • van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of otologic surgery,
  • Recent ototoxic drug use,
  • Congenital inner ear malformation,
  • History of chemoradiotherapy due to malignant neoplasia,
  • Presence of acute or chronic otitis media,
  • Age under 18 years, over 70 years
  • History of local anesthesia allergy,
  • Coagulation abnormality,
  • Pregnant and lactating women,
  • Hearing cases with other neurootological diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS)
Device: Vibration Anesthesia Device (VAD)
In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with VAD in patients treated with ITS provided pain palliation in a similar way to other local anesthetic techniques. Moreover, the advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs. Our study will shed light on different techniques such as the application of ventilation tube in anesthesia with VAD.
Active Comparator: 2.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Drug: local anesthetic cream
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Active Comparator: 3.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Drug: lidocaine spray
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Placebo Comparator: 4.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Other: saline drops
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). the visual analog scale (VAS) scaled between 0-10,were used.
56 weeks
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale(NRS-11)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). the numerical rating scale (NRS) scaled between 0-10 were used.
56 weeks
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale(VRS-4)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4). the verbal rating scale (VRS) scaled between 0-4 were used.
56 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Yuzuncu Yıl University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Desicion No:03 Date:17.06.2020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sudden Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Vibration Anesthesia Device (VAD)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Germany

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe