One Cause of Heel Pain is Plantar Fasciopathy (PF). In Most Cases, a Heel Spur is Frequently Present Alongside PF. We Aim to Evaluate the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection and Radiofrequency Ablation, Along With Tissue Elasticity Assessed by Ultrasound, in Patients With Chronic Pain (≥6 Months).

August 6, 2025 updated by: Gülen Güler, TC Erciyes University

Evaluation of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Versus Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Chronic Calcaneal Spur Related Plantar Fasciopathy Using Elastography and Foot Function Index

Heel pain is common among adults. One cause of heel pain is plantar fasciopathy (PF). In most cases, a heel spur, a bony prominence that extends into the plantar fascia, is frequently present alongside PF. First-line treatments include pain-relieving drugs, home exercises, heel support peds, and physical therapy. However, some patients can't get relief from these therapies, and the pain persists beyond six months. This situation is referred to as refractory chronic PF. Local treatments applied via skin puncture such as anti-inflamtory injection and destruction of nerves carrying pain signals to brain are warranted in these cases. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency ablation, along with tissue elasticity assessed by ultrasound, in patients with chronic pain (≥6 months).

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine which treatment-corticosteroid injection or radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation-is more effective for treating plantar fasciopathy in adults. It will also learn about the effects of the treatments on the properties of the heel tissue using ultrasound. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation have the same efficacy on pain and functionality for both short- and long-term? Do corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation similarly affect heel tissue? The researchers will investigate which of the corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency thermocoagulation is more effective for

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is one of the most common causes of foot pain, accounting for approximately 10-15% of all cases. The plantar fascia originates from the calcaneus on the plantar surface of the foot and inserts into the proximal phalanges. It becomes tense while standing and provides support to the medial longitudinal arch. Although the pathophysiology of PF is not fully understood, repetitive mechanical overload is believed to cause microtears, particularly at the medial origin of the plantar fascia. Subsequent inflammation and degeneration may become chronic, and excessive traction at the medial calcaneus can lead to the formation of a bony outgrowth called a calcaneal spur. This bony protrusion may increase pain by causing inflammation, nerve compression, and atrophy of the heel fat pad. Approximately 67% of patients with PF present with a calcaneal spur.

Typically, patients complain of heel pain upon taking their first steps in the morning or after periods of rest, and during weight-bearing activities. On physical examination, tenderness is usually observed along the medial aspect of the heel, and pain is exacerbated with toe extension. Diagnosis is generally based on clinical history and physical examination. Ultrasound imaging can aid in diagnosis due to its rapid application and bedside availability. Conventional ultrasonography may reveal thickening of the plantar fascia, perifascial edema, hypoechoic areas within the fascia, and the presence of a calcaneal spur.

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a modern, non-invasive ultrasound modality that measures tissue stiffness and elasticity. Measuring the stiffness of the plantar fascia using SWE, along with B-mode parameters, can facilitate diagnosis. Moreover, it allows monitoring of structural changes in the fascia following treatment.

Treatment options for PF include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy, orthotics, night splints, corticosteroid injections (CSIs), platelet-rich plasma injections, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While corticosteroid injection may provide short-term pain relief, it is associated with risks, including alteration of connective tissue microstructure and fat pad atrophy. In RFA, continuous electrical current generates heat, leading to the destruction of nociceptive free nerve endings in the target area. RFA has been successfully used for decades in the management of lower back pain, head and facial pain, sympathetic chain ablation, and joint pain. Various studies have also supported its efficacy and safety in treating PF.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of RFA and CSI using the Foot Function Index (FFI) score at 6 months. The secondary aim is to assess pain scores and structural changes in the plantar fascia using SWE.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Talas
      • Kayseri, Talas, Turkey
        • Erciyes Universitesi Tıp Fakultesi
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gülen Güler, Prof. Dr. M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ersin Sönmez, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • İsa Cüce, Ass. Prof., M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with chronic (≥ 6 months) plantar fasciopathy
  2. NRS score ≥ 4
  3. Presence of a calcaneal spur detected by ultrasound (USG) or direct radiography
  4. At least one of the following treatments has been administered:

    • Home exercise program
    • Physiotherapy
    • Orthosis/prosthesis
    • NSAIDs
    • Night splint
    • Kinesio taping
    • Corticosteroid injection
    • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of calcaneal trauma/fracture
  2. Previous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment
  3. Patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy
  4. Inflammatory or degenerative arthropathies
  5. Presence of diabetes
  6. Pregnancy
  7. History of cancer
  8. Peripheral neuropathy or ischemia
  9. Open wound or signs of infection at the procedure site
  10. Evidence of systemic infection
  11. Patients using anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents
  12. Presence of an intracardiac defibrillator or pacemaker
  13. Patients with tarsal tunnel syndrome
  14. Patients who have received ESWT and/or corticosteroid injection within the last 3 months
  15. Presence of heel pain due to lumbar radiculopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Corticosteroid Injection
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below. The symptomatic foot will be prepared with povidone-iodine and draped in a sterile manner. A sterile-covered ultrasound probe will be placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and any calcaneal spur. Subsequently, 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg (KENACORT-A IM/Intra-articular Retard 40 mg ampoule) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine (Aritmal 2% ampoule) will be injected over the plantar fascia.
The symptomatic foot will be prepared with povidone-iodine and draped in a sterile manner. A sterile-covered ultrasound probe will be placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and any calcaneal spur. Subsequently, 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg (KENACORT-A IM/Intra-articular Retard 40 mg ampoule) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine (Aritmal 2% ampoule) will be injected over the plantar fascia.
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below. The foot was prepared with povidone-iodine and draped under sterile conditions. A sterilized ultrasound probe was placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and calcaneal spur. A 10 cm long radiofrequency (RF) needle with a 5 mm active tip was advanced in-plane under ultrasound guidance toward the tip of the calcaneal spur. Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz elicited paresthesia in the medial calcaneus, while motor stimulation at 2 Hz did not produce any muscle contractions. The RF generator (Beijing Neo Science Co., RFE 4b) was set to 80 °C for 90 seconds, and the RFA procedure was initiated.
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below. The foot was prepared with povidone-iodine and draped under sterile conditions. A sterilized ultrasound probe was placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and calcaneal spur. A 10 cm long radiofrequency (RF) needle with a 5 mm active tip was advanced in-plane under ultrasound guidance toward the tip of the calcaneal spur. Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz elicited paresthesia in the medial calcaneus, while motor stimulation at 2 Hz did not produce any muscle contractions. The RF generator (Beijing Neo Science Co., RFE 4b) was set to 80 °C for 90 seconds, and the RFA procedure was initiated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot Function Index Score (FFI)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100. A lower score is better.
6 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10. A lower score is better
6 months after treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100. A lower score is better
1 month after treatment
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: Baseline
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100. A lower score is better
Baseline
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100. A lower score is better
3 months after treatment
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10. A lower score is better
Baseline
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10. A lower score is better
1 month after treatment
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity. The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10. A lower score is better
3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gülen Güler, Prof. Dr., M.D., Erciyes Üniversity School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deindividualized data will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after the study is completed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe