- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07120204
- Original Trial
One Cause of Heel Pain is Plantar Fasciopathy (PF). In Most Cases, a Heel Spur is Frequently Present Alongside PF. We Aim to Evaluate the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection and Radiofrequency Ablation, Along With Tissue Elasticity Assessed by Ultrasound, in Patients With Chronic Pain (≥6 Months).
Evaluation of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Versus Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Chronic Calcaneal Spur Related Plantar Fasciopathy Using Elastography and Foot Function Index
Heel pain is common among adults. One cause of heel pain is plantar fasciopathy (PF). In most cases, a heel spur, a bony prominence that extends into the plantar fascia, is frequently present alongside PF. First-line treatments include pain-relieving drugs, home exercises, heel support peds, and physical therapy. However, some patients can't get relief from these therapies, and the pain persists beyond six months. This situation is referred to as refractory chronic PF. Local treatments applied via skin puncture such as anti-inflamtory injection and destruction of nerves carrying pain signals to brain are warranted in these cases. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency ablation, along with tissue elasticity assessed by ultrasound, in patients with chronic pain (≥6 months).
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine which treatment-corticosteroid injection or radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation-is more effective for treating plantar fasciopathy in adults. It will also learn about the effects of the treatments on the properties of the heel tissue using ultrasound. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation have the same efficacy on pain and functionality for both short- and long-term? Do corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency thermal thermocoagulation similarly affect heel tissue? The researchers will investigate which of the corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency thermocoagulation is more effective for
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is one of the most common causes of foot pain, accounting for approximately 10-15% of all cases. The plantar fascia originates from the calcaneus on the plantar surface of the foot and inserts into the proximal phalanges. It becomes tense while standing and provides support to the medial longitudinal arch. Although the pathophysiology of PF is not fully understood, repetitive mechanical overload is believed to cause microtears, particularly at the medial origin of the plantar fascia. Subsequent inflammation and degeneration may become chronic, and excessive traction at the medial calcaneus can lead to the formation of a bony outgrowth called a calcaneal spur. This bony protrusion may increase pain by causing inflammation, nerve compression, and atrophy of the heel fat pad. Approximately 67% of patients with PF present with a calcaneal spur.
Typically, patients complain of heel pain upon taking their first steps in the morning or after periods of rest, and during weight-bearing activities. On physical examination, tenderness is usually observed along the medial aspect of the heel, and pain is exacerbated with toe extension. Diagnosis is generally based on clinical history and physical examination. Ultrasound imaging can aid in diagnosis due to its rapid application and bedside availability. Conventional ultrasonography may reveal thickening of the plantar fascia, perifascial edema, hypoechoic areas within the fascia, and the presence of a calcaneal spur.
Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a modern, non-invasive ultrasound modality that measures tissue stiffness and elasticity. Measuring the stiffness of the plantar fascia using SWE, along with B-mode parameters, can facilitate diagnosis. Moreover, it allows monitoring of structural changes in the fascia following treatment.
Treatment options for PF include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy, orthotics, night splints, corticosteroid injections (CSIs), platelet-rich plasma injections, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While corticosteroid injection may provide short-term pain relief, it is associated with risks, including alteration of connective tissue microstructure and fat pad atrophy. In RFA, continuous electrical current generates heat, leading to the destruction of nociceptive free nerve endings in the target area. RFA has been successfully used for decades in the management of lower back pain, head and facial pain, sympathetic chain ablation, and joint pain. Various studies have also supported its efficacy and safety in treating PF.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of RFA and CSI using the Foot Function Index (FFI) score at 6 months. The secondary aim is to assess pain scores and structural changes in the plantar fascia using SWE.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ersin Sönmez, M.D.
- Phone Number: +905370257858
- Email: ersinsonmez@erciyes.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
Talas
-
Kayseri, Talas, Turkey
- Erciyes Universitesi Tıp Fakultesi
-
Contact:
- Gülen Güler, Prof. Dr., M.D.
- Phone Number: +905327922484
- Email: gulen@erciyes.edu.tr
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Gülen Güler, Prof. Dr. M.D.
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ersin Sönmez, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- İsa Cüce, Ass. Prof., M.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with chronic (≥ 6 months) plantar fasciopathy
- NRS score ≥ 4
- Presence of a calcaneal spur detected by ultrasound (USG) or direct radiography
At least one of the following treatments has been administered:
- Home exercise program
- Physiotherapy
- Orthosis/prosthesis
- NSAIDs
- Night splint
- Kinesio taping
- Corticosteroid injection
- Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of calcaneal trauma/fracture
- Previous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment
- Patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy
- Inflammatory or degenerative arthropathies
- Presence of diabetes
- Pregnancy
- History of cancer
- Peripheral neuropathy or ischemia
- Open wound or signs of infection at the procedure site
- Evidence of systemic infection
- Patients using anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents
- Presence of an intracardiac defibrillator or pacemaker
- Patients with tarsal tunnel syndrome
- Patients who have received ESWT and/or corticosteroid injection within the last 3 months
- Presence of heel pain due to lumbar radiculopathy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Corticosteroid Injection
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below.
The symptomatic foot will be prepared with povidone-iodine and draped in a sterile manner.
A sterile-covered ultrasound probe will be placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and any calcaneal spur.
Subsequently, 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg (KENACORT-A IM/Intra-articular Retard 40 mg ampoule) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine (Aritmal 2% ampoule) will be injected over the plantar fascia.
|
The symptomatic foot will be prepared with povidone-iodine and draped in a sterile manner.
A sterile-covered ultrasound probe will be placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and any calcaneal spur.
Subsequently, 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg (KENACORT-A IM/Intra-articular Retard 40 mg ampoule) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine (Aritmal 2% ampoule) will be injected over the plantar fascia.
|
|
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below.
The foot was prepared with povidone-iodine and draped under sterile conditions.
A sterilized ultrasound probe was placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and calcaneal spur.
A 10 cm long radiofrequency (RF) needle with a 5 mm active tip was advanced in-plane under ultrasound guidance toward the tip of the calcaneal spur.
Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz elicited paresthesia in the medial calcaneus, while motor stimulation at 2 Hz did not produce any muscle contractions.
The RF generator (Beijing Neo Science Co., RFE 4b) was set to 80 °C for 90 seconds, and the RFA procedure was initiated.
|
The patient will be in the lateral decubitus position with the symptomatic foot below.
The foot was prepared with povidone-iodine and draped under sterile conditions.
A sterilized ultrasound probe was placed over the heel to visualize the calcaneus, plantar fascia, and calcaneal spur.
A 10 cm long radiofrequency (RF) needle with a 5 mm active tip was advanced in-plane under ultrasound guidance toward the tip of the calcaneal spur.
Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz elicited paresthesia in the medial calcaneus, while motor stimulation at 2 Hz did not produce any muscle contractions.
The RF generator (Beijing Neo Science Co., RFE 4b) was set to 80 °C for 90 seconds, and the RFA procedure was initiated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Foot Function Index Score (FFI)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
|
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100.
A lower score is better.
|
6 months after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
|
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10.
A lower score is better
|
6 months after treatment
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
|
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100.
A lower score is better
|
1 month after treatment
|
|
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100.
A lower score is better
|
Baseline
|
|
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
|
FFI includes 23 11-point Likert-type questions about feet.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 100.
A lower score is better
|
3 months after treatment
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
|
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10.
A lower score is better
|
Baseline
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
|
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10.
A lower score is better
|
1 month after treatment
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) Scores
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
|
NRS-11 is an 11-point Likert-type scale that assesses pain severity.
The lowest score is 0, and the highest score is 10.
A lower score is better
|
3 months after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Gülen Güler, Prof. Dr., M.D., Erciyes Üniversity School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025/60
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.