Sepsis-associated Thrombocytopenia and Platelet Transfusion (STAPT)

The Impact of Platelet Transfusion Therapy on 28-day Mortality in Septic Patients With Thrombocytopenia During ICU Stay: a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

Currently, there are no multicenter studies on platelet transfusion for SAT patients, and the benefits and risks of platelet transfusion still require further validation based on large-sample data. In summary, investigating the correlation between platelet transfusion during ICU stay and 28-day mortality in SAT patients, as well as evaluating the impact of platelet transfusion on bleeding, thrombotic events, and inflammation control, is of great significance for optimizing SAT management strategies. This study aims to analyze the effect of platelet transfusion on the prognosis of SAT patients, thereby providing an evidence-based foundation for clinical decision-making.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Sepsis is the most common cause of thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with an incidence rate as high as 35%-59%. Severe thrombocytopenia (≤50×10⁹/L) accounts for 30% of cases, and the degree of thrombocytopenia is positively correlated with mortality risk [1-3]. Studies have shown that patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia (SAT) not only experience prolonged ICU stays and mechanical ventilation duration but also have significantly increased rates of major bleeding events and renal replacement therapy. Meanwhile, the 28-day mortality rate rises with the severity of thrombocytopenia [4, 5]. Platelets play a dual role in sepsis: on one hand, they act as "innocent bystanders" reflecting disease severity; on the other hand, they participate in the pathological process through immune regulation and microvascular protection. For example, platelets contribute to host defense by facilitating neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation mediated by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), but a reduction in platelet count can lead to impaired endothelial barrier function, exacerbating organ edema and bleeding risk [6, 7]. Furthermore, dynamic changes in platelet morphological parameters, such as mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW), are independently associated with inflammatory response and mortality, highlighting the importance of platelet function monitoring [8].

In clinical practice, the primary goal of exogenous platelet transfusion in SAT patients is to rapidly increase circulating platelet counts in cases of inadequate platelet production or excessive consumption, thereby reducing bleeding risk. Due to the complex mechanisms of thrombocytopenia in sepsis-including bone marrow suppression, peripheral consumption (e.g., disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), immune-mediated destruction), and splenic sequestration-endogenous platelet recovery is often delayed. Exogenous transfusion provides immediate platelet supplementation, particularly for patients with severe thrombocytopenia (≤50×10⁹/L) accompanied by bleeding tendencies or those requiring invasive procedures (e.g., surgery, central venous catheterization) [9]. Compared to endogenous platelet production (which typically takes 5-7 days), exogenous transfusion helps to rapidly correct hemostatic function, reduce the risk of spontaneous bleeding (such as gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding); improve endothelial barrier function, decrease microvascular leakage, thereby alleviating organ edema and hypoxic injury; and provide platelets with immunomodulatory activity, potentially regulating excessive inflammatory responses through the release of anti-inflammatory factors (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10) [10, 11].

However, current treatment strategies for SAT remain controversial. Some studies indicate that platelet transfusion may increase in-hospital mortality, particularly in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (≤50×10⁹/L), where transfusion is associated with higher 28-day and 90-day mortality rates, along with risks such as transfusion reactions and alloimmunization [12, 13]. Potential mechanisms include: the inflammatory microenvironment in septic patients may cause rapid activation or destruction of transfused platelets, reducing transfusion efficacy; allogeneic platelets may carry pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., mitochondrial DNA, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)), further exacerbating systemic inflammatory response; and transfusion-related complications, such as transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), and alloimmune reactions, may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes [14, 15]. Additionally, recent studies have found that platelet function may be impaired in septic patients (e.g., increased glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα) shedding), leading to reduced adhesion and aggregation capacity of transfused platelets and potentially worsening endothelial dysfunction [16].

Previous studies on platelet transfusion and outcomes in SAT patients were all based on database analyses. The results showed that platelet transfusion in septic patients with thrombocytopenia was associated with increased mortality [17, 18]. Currently, there are no multicenter studies on platelet transfusion specifically for SAT patients, and the benefits and risks of platelet transfusion still require further validation based on large-sample data.

In summary, investigating the correlation between platelet transfusion during ICU stay and 28-day mortality in SAT patients, as well as evaluating the impact of platelet transfusion on bleeding and thrombotic events and inflammation control, is of great significance for optimizing SAT management strategies. This study aims to analyze the effect of platelet transfusion on the prognosis of SAT patients, thereby providing an evidence-based foundation for clinical decision-making.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lulan Li, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Meeting the Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria and platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L at ICU admission

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to the ICU between January 2021 and May 2024 and subsequently discharged
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Meeting the Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria
  • Platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L at ICU admission
  • ICU length of stay ≥ 48 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active bleeding (e.g., major gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage) or hematologic malignancies (e.g., leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, lymphoma);
  • Liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class B/C), chronic kidney disease (CKD stage 4-5), or autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus);
  • Receipt of chemotherapy, immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine, rituximab), or hematopoietic stem cell/solid organ transplantation within 2 weeks;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Pre-existing chronic thrombocytopenia (baseline platelet count <100×10⁹/L for >1 month) or long-term use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs (>2 weeks);
  • Significant baseline coagulation dysfunction at ICU admission:Prothrombin time (PT) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal; Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal; Fibrinogen level <1.0 g/L;
  • APACHE II score ≥30 within 24 hours of ICU admission;
  • Missing >20% of key data (e.g., daily platelet counts, ICU survival status within 28 days).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Platelet Transfusion Group
Platelet Transfusion within 14 days after ICU admission
Whether or not the SAT patients received Platelet infusion
No Platelet Transfusion Group
No Platelet Transfusion within 14 days after ICU admission
Whether or not the SAT patients received Platelet infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU mortality
Time Frame: Survival status from ICU admission to discharge/transfer from the ICU.
Survival status from ICU admission to discharge/transfer from the ICU.
Survival status from ICU admission to discharge/transfer from the ICU.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding events
Time Frame: Within 28 days from ICU admission or at the time of ICU transfer/discharge.
Record newly occurring gastrointestinal bleeding, airway bleeding, epistaxis, oral bleeding, and subcutaneous bleeding within 28 days, based on records from the electronic medical record (EMR) or intensive care unit (ICU) information system
Within 28 days from ICU admission or at the time of ICU transfer/discharge.
Thrombotic events
Time Frame: Within 28 days from ICU admission or at the time of ICU transfer/discharge.
Record deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurring within 28 days, based on records from the electronic medical record (EMR) or intensive care unit (ICU) information system
Within 28 days from ICU admission or at the time of ICU transfer/discharge.
ICU length of stay within 28 days
Time Frame: within 28 days after ICU admission
within 28 days after ICU admission
Platelet transfusion therapy-related endpoints
Time Frame: Post-transfusion day 1, 3, 5, and 7
Record dose-response relationship between platelet transfusion frequency/dosage and ICU mortality;Platelet counts on Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, and Day 7 after platelet transfusion.
Post-transfusion day 1, 3, 5, and 7
Laboratory indicator-related endpoints
Time Frame: Post-transfusion day 1, 3, 5, and 7
Record the dynamic trajectory of platelet counts (e.g., recovery rate, duration of low values, fluctuation amplitude) based on laboratory results; Trends in platelet morphological parameters (MPV, PDW) and inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP, PCT).
Post-transfusion day 1, 3, 5, and 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on SAT patients

Subscribe