- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07253818
Passive Leg Raising in Term Pregnancy on Hemodynamic Monitoring - Validating With Transthoracic ECHO (LG-ECHO) ((LG-ECHO))
Transthoracic Echocardiography as the Reference for Validating Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring During Passive Leg Raising in Term Pregnancy
This prospective observational validation study aims to evaluate the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of ClearSight™ compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during PLR in term pregnant women.
The ultimate goal is to determine whether ClearSight™ can reliably identify preload responsiveness in term pregnant women compared with the echocardiographic gold standard. The clinical implication is that, if validated, ClearSight™ may reduce unnecessary or harmful fluid administration by accurately detecting preload reserve, and improve maternal safety in peripartum care by providing obstetric anesthesiologists with reliable bedside monitoring tools.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Background Pregnancy is characterized by profound hemodynamic changes, which complicate perioperative monitoring and fluid therapy. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device, ClearSight™ system, provides continuous stroke volume estimates, but their reliability in pregnant women remains uncertain. Passive leg raising (PLR) is a reversible preload test that can elucidate fluid responsiveness without fluid administration. To date, no study has simultaneously validated ClearSight™ against echocardiographic reference standards during PLR in term pregnant women.
Methods This is a prospective, single-centre, method-comparison and diagnostic accuracy study in term pregnant women (≥37 weeks). Simultaneous ClearSight™ and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) measurements will be obtained at baseline, during PLR, and during recovery. The primary outcome is agreement between ClearSight™-derived stroke volume index (SVI) changes and TTE-derived Left Ventricular Outflow Tract - Velocity Time Integral (LVOT-VTI) changes during PLR. Secondary outcomes include trending ability and diagnostic accuracy of ClearSight™ Δ%SVI for detecting PLR responders. Four-quadrant and polar plot analyses are the parameters for advanced hemodynamic monitoring methods used in echocardiography to assess fluid responsiveness and cardiac output (CO) trending Sample size: 60 participants, providing at least 180 paired observations.
Conclusions This study will establish whether ClearSight™ can reliably detect preload responsiveness in term pregnant women. Findings could support safer, real-time, non-invasive hemodynamic management during obstetric anaesthesia and maternal critical care.
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
- UF Health Jacksonville (Shands Hospital)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Term pregnant patients
- Singleton pregnancy at ≥37+0 weeks of gestation.
- Maternal age between 18 and 45 years.
- Hemodynamically stable and in sinus rhythm.
- Ability to provide verbal and written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, significant valvular or congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or persistent arrhythmias.
- Multiple gestation (i.e., Twin pregnancy and above)
- Endocrine or hematologic conditions likely to affect hemodynamics, including diabetes with or without autonomic neuropathy, thyroid storm, or severe anemia (hemoglobin <8 g/dL).
- Active labor with pain or current infusion of uterotonic or vasoactive agents.
- Ruptured membranes with frequent contractions or indications for emergent delivery.
- Inadequate transthoracic echocardiographic imaging windows at screening.
- Emergency or STAT (statim) Cesarean Deliveries
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement between ClearSight™-derived stroke volume index (SVI) changes and TTE-derived Left Ventricular Outflow Tract - Velocity Time Integral (LVOT-VTI) changes during PLR.
Time Frame: During PLR
|
The primary outcome is agreement between ClearSight™-derived stroke volume index (SVI) changes and TTE-derived Left Ventricular Outflow Tract - Velocity Time Integral (LVOT-VTI) changes during PLR.
|
During PLR
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trending ability and diagnostic accuracy of ClearSight™ Δ%SVI for detecting PLR responders
Time Frame: During PLR
|
Trending ability and diagnostic accuracy of ClearSight™ Δ%SVI for detecting PLR responders
|
During PLR
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ayten Saracoglu, Prof. MD, University of Florida
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, Fernando R, McDonnell N, Mercier FJ, Palanisamy A, Sia ATH, Van de Velde M, Vercueil A; Consensus Statement Collaborators. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73(1):71-92. doi: 10.1111/anae.14080. Epub 2017 Nov 1. No abstract available.
- McLaughlin K, Wright SP, Kingdom JCP, Parker JD. Clinical Validation of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Healthy Pregnant Women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Nov;39(11):1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
- Ling HZ, Gallardo-Arozena M, Company-Calabuig AM, Nicolaides KH, Kametas NA. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy. Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1307-1313. doi: 10.1111/anae.15110. Epub 2020 May 29.
- Cornette J, Laker S, Jeffery B, Lombaard H, Alberts A, Rizopoulos D, Roos-Hesselink JW, Pattinson RC. Validation of maternal cardiac output assessed by transthoracic echocardiography against pulmonary artery catheterization in severely ill pregnant women: prospective comparative study and systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;49(1):25-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.16015. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
- Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA; Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Feb;15(2):167-84. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.120202. No abstract available.
- Duclos G, Granier S, Hili A, Blanc J, Einav S, Leone M, Zieleskiewicz L. Performance of non-invasive stroke volume variation during passive leg raising as a predictor of hypotension following induction of spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a single cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 May;50:103251. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103251. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
- Vartun A, Flo K, Acharya G. Effect of passive leg raising on systemic hemodynamics of pregnant women: a dynamic assessment of maternal cardiovascular function at 22-24 weeks of gestation. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094629. eCollection 2014.
- Duclos G, Hili A, Resseguier N, Kelway C, Haddam M, Bourgoin A, Carcopino X, Zieleskiewicz L, Leone M. Clearsight use for haemodynamic monitoring during the third trimester of pregnancy - a validation study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018 Nov;36:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 8.
- Marques NR, Martinello C, Kramer GC, Costantine MM, Vadhera RB, Saade GR, Hankins GD, Pacheco LD. Passive leg raising during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Mar;32(4):393-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389089. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
- Herrera S, Kuhlmann-Capek MJ, Rogan SC, Saad AF, Saade GR, Hankins GDV, Pacheco LD. Stroke Volume Recruitability during the Third Trimester of Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;35(8):737-740. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615788. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
- Vartun A, Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Acharya G. Maternal functional hemodynamics in the second half of pregnancy: a longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 10;10(8):e0135300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135300. eCollection 2015.
- Monnet X, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):790. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18.
- Helmer P, Helf D, Sammeth M, Winkler B, Hottenrott S, Meybohm P, Kranke P. The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(R)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section-A Retrospective Validation Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):4498. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154498.
- Akkermans J, Diepeveen M, Ganzevoort W, van Montfrans GA, Westerhof BE, Wolf H. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, a validation study of Nexfin in a pregnant population. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009 May;28(2):230-42. doi: 10.1080/10641950802601260.
- Lihme F, Basit S, Persson LG, Larsen MO, Lauridsen KH, Lykke JA, Andersen AS, Halse K, Thorsen-Meyer A, Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Boyd HA. Reference ranges for third-trimester maternal cardiovascular function parameters measured in normotensive pregnant women using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor: A study based on data from the prospective PEACH cohort study. BJOG. 2024 Mar;131(4):463-471. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17667. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
- Bijl RC, Valensise H, Novelli GP, Vasapollo B, Wilkinson I, Thilaganathan B, Stohr EJ, Lees C, van der Marel CD, Cornette JMJ; International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics. Methods and considerations concerning cardiac output measurement in pregnant women: recommendations of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;54(1):35-50. doi: 10.1002/uog.20231.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AS-01-OBS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.