Lower-Extremity Strength and Power in Elite Hockey Players With and Without Patellar Tendinopathy

January 14, 2026 updated by: Sofia Ryman Ryman Augustsson, Linnaeus University
This study aims to identify differences in lower-extremity strength and power between elite ice hockey players with and without patellar tendinopathy using unilateral and bilateral comparisons. It applies a structured, cross-sectional methodology that combines clinical screening, performance testing, and ultrasound imaging to characterize patellar tendon structure and lower-limb function in elite hockey players. Players are objectively classified into healthy, unilateral, or bilateral patellar tendinopathy groups based on standardized ultrasound criteria. Strength and power outcomes are assessed under controlled conditions and normalized to body mass to allow fair between-group comparisons. Isokinetic concentric strength is evaluated during a split squat performed on a robotic resistance device, while peak power output is measured using a six-second all-out cycling test on a calibrated ergometer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study investigates whether asymptomatic structural changes impair strength and power generation in hockey players using a between-group analysis based on patellar tendon thickness. Due to a compressed training schedule, testing occurs over consecutive days under standardized conditions. On day one, players provide informed consent and complete injury screening and anthropometric assessments. Strength and power testing is conducted on days two and three by one investigator and analyzed relative to body mass, given the association between patellar tendon thickness and BMI. On day four, a blinded investigator assesses bilateral patellar tendon thickness using ultrasound. On day five, both investigators independently analyze the images. Based on tendon thickness cutoffs, players are classified into healthy, unilateral, or bilateral tendinopathy groups, followed by between-group comparisons of strength and power outcomes.

Screening protocol: A licensed physiotherapist conducts the screening using a binary checklist (yes/no). Criteria include abnormal knee range of motion, knee pain during functional tasks, limping, positive patellar or ligament tests, joint effusion, or unilateral quadriceps atrophy (limb symmetry index <90%). Any positive finding results in immediate exclusion.

Anthropometrics: Body height and body weight are measured privately using a stadiometer and electronic scale, and body mass index is calculated.

Strength testing: Isokinetic leg strength is assessed using a split squat on a robotic resistance device at a concentric speed of 1 m/s. Players perform three maximal repetitions per leg following a standardized warm-up, and peak concentric force is recorded, with the best trial used for analysis.

Power testing: Peak power output is measured using a six-second all-out cycling test on a calibrated ergometer. After a standardized warm-up, resistance is fixed, and players sprint maximally following a countdown. Peak power output is recorded.

Ultrasound examination: Patellar tendon thickness is assessed bilaterally using ultrasound according to standardized guidelines. Players lie supine with the knee flexed ~30°, and longitudinal and transverse scans are obtained. Two independent examiners analyze images, and a tendon thickness >5 mm indicates patellar tendinopathy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kalmar, Sweden, 391 82
        • Sofia Ryman Augustsson

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Twenty-eight male players from the Swedish Hockey League (age: 25 ± 4.6 years; body mass index: 25.5 ± 2.0) participate in this study. Based on ultrasound findings, players are classified as healthy (HG; n = 8), unilateral patellar tendinopathy (UPTG; n = 8), or bilateral patellar tendinopathy (BPTG; n = 12).

Of 35 consenting players, only those without current or prior knee injuries affecting lower-extremity function are included. A licensed physiotherapist conducts screening, excluding five players, while two additional players are excluded due to training-related injuries.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Elite ice-hockey player
  • ≥ 18 year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • injuries to lower extremity that could influence test perfomance
  • deviant passive and active range of motion in the knee joint
  • pain in the knee during squatting, lunging, or jumping
  • limping while walking
  • positive patellar The Royal London Hospital Test
  • palpable or visible the knee joint effusion
  • positive Lachmann, varus/valgus stress test, patellar apprehension, or Murray's/Apley's test
  • hypo- or atrophic quadriceps on only one side (side difference with limb symmetry index < 90%).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Unilateral PT
Ice-hockey players with unilateral patellar tendinopathy
Bilateral PT
Ice-hockey players with bilateral patellar tendinopathy
Control
Ice-hockey players without patellar tendinopathy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Isokinetic leg strength
Time Frame: Day 2
Isokinetic leg strength measured as the concentric peak force (Newton)
Day 2
Wattbike Peak 6 test
Time Frame: Day 3
A six-second "all-out" peak power test on the Wattbike measured in Watt
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-01700-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellar Tendinitis

Subscribe