Advanced Endoscopic Resections for Rectal Neoplasms

February 13, 2026 updated by: Zofia Orzeszko, Jagiellonian University

Adoption of Advanced Endoscopic Resection Methods in the Treatment of Rectal Neoplasms

This study evaluates how advanced endoscopic resection techniques affect treatment outcomes in adults with rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer has traditionally been treated with standard abdominal surgery. Newer endoscopic techniques allow removal of selected early tumors and may reduce treatment-related complications. However, their effectiveness and safety in tumors with deeper invasion are not yet fully established.

This multicenter retrospective observational study uses existing medical records from adults who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection of rectal tumors between 2015 and 2025. Researchers will analyze anonymized information on procedures performed and treatment outcomes to assess the safety and effectiveness of advanced endoscopic approaches.

The results of this study may help guide treatment selection and improve care for people with rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with rectal neoplasms treated with advanced endoscopic resection in a tertiary center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with rectal neoplasms treated by advanced endoscopic resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hybrid resection performed
  • full-thickness resection performed
  • essential procedural or outcome data were unavailable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ESD
Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasm
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an advanced endoscopic technique used to remove rectal tumors in one piece through the endoscope. A circumferential incision is then made in the mucosa, followed by careful dissection within the submucosal layer until the lesion is completely removed. This technique enables precise pathological assessment of tumor margins and depth of invasion and is typically used for lesions suspected to have superficial submucosal invasion without clear evidence of lymph node involvement. The procedure is performed using standard therapeutic endoscopic equipment and electrosurgical devices.
EID
Patients who underwent endoscopic intermuscular dissection for rectal neoplasm
Endoscopic intermuscular dissection is an advanced endoscopic resection technique designed for rectal tumors with suspected deeper submucosal invasion. Following mucosal incision, the dissection is intentionally performed in the plane between the inner circular and outer longitudinal muscle layers of the rectal wall. This allows deeper en bloc tumor removal compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection. The goal of this technique is to achieve complete resection while potentially avoiding radical surgery in selected patients. The procedure is performed endoscopically using specialized dissection knives and electrosurgical systems and requires advanced operator expertise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major intraprocedural bleeding rate
Time Frame: During the procedure
Bleeding occurring during the procedure that required advanced endoscopic hemostatic interventions beyond standard coagulation with the tip of the knife of coagulation forceps, resulted in hemodynamic instability, caused a significant prolongation of the procedure over 15 minutes (based on video), or led to procedure interruption or conversion
During the procedure
Delayed perforation rate
Time Frame: Within 14 days after the procedure
Clinical signs of peritonitis accompanied by radiological evidence of free intraperitoneal air.
Within 14 days after the procedure
Post-coagulation syndrome rate
Time Frame: Within 28 days following the procedure
The occurrence of localized abdominal pain or peritoneal irritation signs after EID, accompanied by inflammatory response (elevated white blood cell count or C-reactive protein), in the absence of radiological or endoscopic evidence of perforation.
Within 28 days following the procedure
The need for emergency interventions
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the procedure
Any unplanned therapeutic intervention related to the index procedure during hospitalization or follow-up, including repeat endoscopy, endoscopic or radiological intervention, blood transfusion, or surgical treatment. Planned surveillance procedures were not considered additional interventions.
Within 30 days after the procedure
Procedure-related mortality rate
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the procedure
Number of deaths occurring within 30 days of the index procedure that was directly attributable to the procedure or to procedure-related complications. Deaths unrelated to the procedure were reported but not considered procedure-related mortality.
Within 30 days after the procedure
Intraprocedural perforation rate
Time Frame: During the procedure
Full-thickness defect of the gastrointestinal wall identified during the procedure, evidenced by direct visualization of extraluminal structures (mesorectum or peritoneal cavity), or confirmed by the presence of free air on imaging performed immediately after the procedure.
During the procedure
Delayed bleeding rate
Time Frame: Within 28 days after the procedure
Symptomatic bleeding including hematemesis, melena, or a hemoglobin decrease of more than 2 g/dL.
Within 28 days after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
En bloc resection rate
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
The rate of lesions removed in a single specimen, enabling accurate macroscopic and histological assessment as reported by an endoscopist in a procedure protocol.
Intraprocedural
Complete resection rate
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the procedure
The rate of lesions resected completely according to the pathological examination of the resected specimen.
Within 30 days after the procedure
Procedure time
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Procedure time was evaluated on the procedure video and defined as the interval from the insertion of the scope to its final withdrawal measured in minutes; anesthesia-related time was not included.
Intraprocedural
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the procedure
The number of days from the day of the procedure (day 0) to the day of hospital discharge.
Within 30 days after the procedure
The need for additional treatment
Time Frame: Within 12 months after the procedure
The number of patients who required completion surgery or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Within 12 months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Permission for data sharing was not included in the bioethics committee approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic intramuscular dissection

Subscribe