- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07456800
PK of Deupirfenidone Versus Pirfenidone in Older Healthy Subjects
March 3, 2026 updated by: PureTech
A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Study in Older Healthy Subjects to Compare the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Lyt-100 (Deupirfenidone) to Pirfenidone
A three-part, randomized, double-blind study in healthy older adults to identify a dose of deupirfenidone for further clinical study.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A Phase 1 study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and PK in older healthy subjects of multiple twice daily (BID) or 3 times daily (TID) doses of deupirfenidone administered over 3 days compared to that of pirfenidone or placebo administered TID.
The study also investigated the PK profile of deupirfenidone at steady state compared to that of pirfenidone at steady state and the effect of food on the PK profile of deupirfenidone and pirfenidone.
The study was conducted in 3 parts.
Part 1 was a randomized, double-blinded, two-period crossover study conducted in healthy older adults to evaluate the tolerability differentiation of BID dosing of deupirfenidone to pirfenidone.
Part 2 was a randomized, double-blinded, two-period crossover study conducted in healthy older adults to evaluate the tolerability differentiation of TID dosing of deupirfenidone to pirfenidone.
Part 3 was a randomized, double-blinded, parallel arm, placebo-controlled study conducted in healthy older adults to evaluate the safety and tolerability of two doses of deupirfenidone.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
116
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
- Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC.
-
-
Florida
-
Lake Mary, Florida, United States, 32746
- Accel Research Sites
-
-
New Jersey
-
Berlin, New Jersey, United States, 08009
- Hassman Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
- Male or female between 60 and 80 years old (inclusive) at the time of Screening.
- In good general health at Screening, free from clinically significant laboratory values, or clinically significant unstable medical, surgical, or psychiatric illness, as determined by the Investigator. Subjects with mild, chronic, stable disease and on stable medication could be included if deemed medically prudent by the Investigator.
- Has a body mass index (BMI) between ≥18.0 and ≤50.0 kg/m2 at Screening.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Part 1 Active
deupirfenidone 850 mg BID
|
Swedish orange capsule
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Part 1 Active Comparator
pirfenidone 801 mg TID
|
Swedish orange capsule
|
|
Experimental: Part 2 Active
deupirfenidone 550 mg TID
|
Swedish orange capsule
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Part 2 Active Comparator
pirfenidone 801 mg TID
|
Swedish orange capsule
|
|
Experimental: Part 3 Active
deupirfenidone 550/824 mg TID
|
Swedish orange capsule
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Part 3 Placebo
placebo TID
|
Swedish orange capsule
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Cmax of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 days
|
To compare the Cmax of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 days
|
|
Part 2: Cmax of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 days
|
To compare the Cmax of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 days
|
|
Part 3: Cmax of TID deupirfenidone versus placebo
Time Frame: 6 days
|
To evaluate the Cmax of two doses of deupirfenidone.
|
6 days
|
|
Part 1: AUC of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 Days
|
To compare the AUC of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 Days
|
|
Part 1: Tmax of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 Days
|
To compare the Tmax of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 Days
|
|
Part 2: AUC of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 Days
|
To compare the AUC of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 Days
|
|
Part 2: Tmax of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 14 Days
|
To compare the Tmax of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered in a two-period crossover design.
|
14 Days
|
|
Part 3: AUC of TID deupirfenidone versus placebo
Time Frame: 6 Days
|
To evaluate the AUC of two doses of deupirfenidone.
|
6 Days
|
|
Part 3: PK profile of TID deupirfenidone versus placebo
Time Frame: 6 Days
|
To evaluate the Tmax of two doses of deupirfenidone.
|
6 Days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: The effect of food on the Cmax of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 1 day
|
To compare the Cmax of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
1 day
|
|
Part 2: The effect of food on the Cmax of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 1 day
|
To compare the Cmax of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
1 day
|
|
Part 1: The effect of food on the AUC of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 6 Days
|
To compare the AUC of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
6 Days
|
|
Part 1: The effect of food on the Tmax of BID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
To compare the Tmax of 850 mg BID dosing of deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID dosing of pirfenidone at steady state, in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
1 Day
|
|
Part 2: The effect of food on the AUC of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
To compare the AUC of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
1 Day
|
|
Part 2: The effect of food on the Tmax of TID deupirfenidone versus TID pirfenidone
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
To compare the Tmax of 550 mg TID deupirfenidone to 801 mg TID pirfenidone at steady state in older healthy subjects, when administered with food on the last day of dosing prior to wash-out in a two-period crossover design.
|
1 Day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven H Reynolds, DO, Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC.
- Principal Investigator: Michael A Hassman, DO, Hassman Research
- Principal Investigator: Bruce G Rankin, DO, Accel Research Sites
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 12, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
January 20, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 3, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 3, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- LYT-100-2021-103
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
This was a pharmacokinetic study with no health-based outcomes.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pharmacokinetic Analysis
-
Aspartes Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Not yet recruitingPharmacokinetic Analysis
-
Rambam Health Care CampusIsrael Cancer AssociationWithdrawnBusulfan Pharmacokinetic Analysis | GST Genetic PolymorphismIsrael
-
Desitin Arzneimittel GmbHCompletedBioequivalence | Pharmacokinetic Analysis | Health Adult SubjectsCanada
-
The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCombined Analysis of Polymorphisms and Dabigatran Pharmacokinetic Parameters
-
Zhongnan HospitalActive, not recruitingPharmacokinetic | Abiraterone Acetate | Plasma Concentration | Gene Polymorphism | Metabolic AnalysisChina
-
University of LiegeNot yet recruitingPharmacokinetic Analysis | Levobupivacaine | Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block | Abdominal Surgery Patients | Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity
-
Samson Clinical Operations Pty LtdCompleted
-
University Children's Hospital, ZurichTerminatedPharmacokineticSwitzerland
-
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.Unknown
Clinical Trials on Deupirfenidone
-
PureTechNot yet recruiting
-
PureTechActive, not recruitingIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisThailand, United States, Philippines, Greece, Georgia, Malaysia, Chile, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, India, South Africa, Romania, South Korea
-
PureTechNovotech (Australia) Pty Limited; Clinipace WorldwideTerminatedCovid19 | Post-acute COVID-19 Respiratory DiseaseUnited States, Brazil, Argentina, Moldova, Republic of, Philippines, Romania, Ukraine, United Kingdom
-
PureTechNovotech (Australia) Pty LimitedTerminatedLymphoedema | Breast Cancer Related LymphoedemaUnited States, Australia
-
PureTechNovotech (Australia) Pty LimitedCompleted