Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Intra-articular Injection Collagen Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Knee Osteoarthritis

April 8, 2026 updated by: Cellontech Co., Ltd.

A Double Blind, Randomized Post Marketing Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Intra-articular Injection Collagen Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Knee Osteoarthritis

This study was designed to assess the efficacy for pain relief, functional improvement, and safety of intra-articular collagen injections compared to hyaluronic acid injections for knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a double-blind study involving 100 participants. After receiving an explanation of the study and voluntarily providing written informed consent, subjects underwent a screening process to confirm eligibility. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive an intra-articular injection of either collagen or hyaluronic acid. To maintain the double-blind design, the intra-articular injection was administered by a separate unblinded injector. During the study period, subjects were required to follow the investigator's instructions. According to the study protocol, subjects participated in the study for 12 months from enrollment. A total of six hospital visits were conducted, including a screening visit, an enrollment/injection visit, visits at 4 and 12 weeks after injection, and follow-up visits at 24 and 52 weeks. At each visit, efficacy was evaluated according to the clinical trial protocol through questionnaire assessments and blood tests, and safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, South Korea
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 19 years or older
  2. Patients with knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA)
  3. Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or less
  4. Patients with a 100 mm VAS pain level of 40 mm or greater
  5. Patients without clinically significant clinical pathology test results during the screening period
  6. Patients who confirmed accurate prescription records for medications taken within at least one week before the study and agree to maintain the same dosage of concomitant medications as before the injection if such medications are continuously administered during the study period
  7. If taking concomitant medications, patients who have been on stable medication for approximately two weeks before participating in the study, considering the duration of drug maintenance in the body (stability must be confirmed one week before screening and reconfirmed at the time of registration when the injection is applied to ensure two weeks of stable medication use)
  8. Rescue analgesic medications administered within one week of intra-articular injection are allowed (given to the subject after injection), provided that if additional analgesics are required due to increased pain at the observation site, patients should agree not to use more than 5 consecutive days or 10 days per month, and to stop taking analgesics at least 2 days before the next visit.
  9. Patients who agree to undergo only non-drug therapies (physical therapy, osteopathy, chiropractic care) as allowed by a clinician (excluding acupuncture)
  10. Patients who agree to have the injection administered to the more painful knee if both knees are affected (intra-articular injections in the contralateral knee are prohibited)
  11. Patients or their legal representatives who consent to participate in the study and sign the written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with ongoing or past autoimmune diseases, either personally or in their family
  2. Patients with a history of anaphylactic reactions
  3. Patients with hypersensitivity to implants
  4. Patients with hypersensitivity to porcine protein
  5. Patients with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 4
  6. Patients with severe effusion
  7. Patients who had a serious injury or received an injection in the affected knee that may interfere with evaluation within 6 months prior to screening
  8. Patients with inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus arthritis, or psoriatic arthritis (except when deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  9. Patients with gout or pseudogout diagnosed within 6 months prior to screening (except when deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  10. Patients with a history of radiation or chemotherapy within the past 2 years (except when deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  11. Diabetic patients (except those who maintain normal blood sugar levels, have no complications related to diabetes, and are deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  12. Patients with infections receiving treatment with antibiotics or antimicrobials that require hospitalization (except when deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  13. Patients receiving adrenocortical hormone therapy (except when deemed eligible for collagen administration by the clinician)
  14. Patients with heart, liver, or kidney diseases (except those maintaining normal test results or deemed clinically insignificant by the clinician, in which case collagen administration is allowed; hypertension excluded)
  15. Patients with viral infections (except those maintaining normal test results or deemed clinically insignificant by the clinician, in which case collagen administration is allowed)
  16. Patients with any clinically significant medical condition that may affect the completion of the study
  17. Patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant
  18. Patients with mental illness or others deemed inappropriate for the study by the study staff
  19. Patients scheduled for surgery during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CartiZol
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized into the intra-articular collagen injection group based on a randomization table.
The product, CartiZol, which contains absorbable collagen, is applied on the cartilage defect to stimulate the neovasculization and cell penetration and to assist the natural wound healing process. It supplements the defective or damaged cartilage.
Other Names:
  • Intra-articular collagen injection
Active Comparator: Synovian inj. (Hyaluronic acid)
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized into the intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection group based on a randomization table.
A hyaluronic acid gel-type intra-articular injection, Synovian inj., facilitates joint lubrication and helps protect cartilage, thereby alleviating pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.
Other Names:
  • Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain (0-100 mm)
Time Frame: From screening to 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The change in the VAS score of the affected knee between screening and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.
  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline (screening) to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale description: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain (higher scores indicate worse pain)

From screening to 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain (0-100 mm)
Time Frame: From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The change in the VAS score of the affected knee between screening and 4 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group. The VAS score of the affected knee at 4 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

    The intra-group change in the VAS score of the affected knee between screening and 4 weeks post-injection will be compared for each group.

  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline (screening) to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale description: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain (higher scores indicate worse pain)

From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The change in the WOMAC score of the affected knee between screening and 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

    The WOMAC score of the affected knee at 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

    The intra-group change in the WOMAC score of the affected knee between screening and 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared for each group.

  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline (screening) to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale range: 0-96 (higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness, and physical dysfunction)

From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The change in the SF-36 score of the affected knee between screening and 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

    The SF-36 score of the affected knee at 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

    The intra-group change in the SF-36 score of the affected knee between screening and 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared for each group.

  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline (screening) to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale range: 0-100 (higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life)

From screening to 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
Participant satisfaction
Time Frame: At 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The score of the affected knee at 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.
  2. Safety Evaluation Analysis The evaluation values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

Scale description:

Participants rated their overall satisfaction regarding pain relief and functional improvement compared to pre-injection status using a 5-point scale:

4 = Markedly improved 3 = Slightly improved 2 = No change

1 = Slightly worsened 0 = Markedly worsened (higher scores indicate greater improvement)

At 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
Investigator satisfaction
Time Frame: At 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The score of the affected knee at 4 and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.
  2. Safety Evaluation Analysis The evaluation values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.

Investigators rated the overall improvement in pain and functional status of the affected knee compared to the pre-injection condition using a 5-point scale:

4 = Markedly improved 3 = Slightly improved 2 = No change

1 = Slightly worsened 0 = Markedly worsened compared to pre-injection (higher scores indicate greater improvement)

At 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
X-ray examination (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1-4)
Time Frame: At 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The score of the affected knee at 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.
  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline (screening) to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale description: Grade 1-4 (higher grades indicate more severe osteoarthritis)

At 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
Biomarker test
Time Frame: From screening to 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection, and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection
  1. Efficacy Evaluation Analysis The change in the test values between screening and 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group. The test values at 12 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test group and the control group.
  2. Follow-up Evaluation Analysis The changes from baseline to 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, the values at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection, and the intra-group changes at 24 and 52 weeks post-injection will be compared between the test and control groups.

Scale description: Continuous laboratory values (units vary by parameter; higher values may indicate abnormal findings depending on the parameter) Parameters include hematologic and serum biochemical tests such as WBC, RBC, hemoglobin(Hb), hematocrit(Hct), platelets(PLT), differential counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), blood urea nitrogen(BUN), creatinine, C-reactive protein(CRP), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), and alanine aminotransferase(ALT).

From screening to 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection, and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yong In, MD, The Catholic University of Korea
  • Principal Investigator: Man-Soo Kim, MD, The Catholic University of Korea
  • Principal Investigator: Geun-Yooung Choi, MD, The Catholic University of Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthitis

Clinical Trials on CartiZol

Subscribe