Efficacy of Intra-articular Collagen Injection in Patients With Knee Joint Pain Compared to Normal Saline Injection

April 7, 2026 updated by: Cellontech Co., Ltd.

Intra-articular Injection of Type I Atelocollagen to Alleviate Knee Pain: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

The primary objective of this study is to confirm the superiority of intra-articular collagen injection in patients with knee joint pain compared to the control group. 100mm VAS is used to measure the pain of the subjects 24 weeks after the procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Two hundred subjects has participated in it. The study is explained to the subjects, and they voluntarily choose to participate in it. Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized either into the intra-articular collagen injection group or the normal saline (placebo) injection group based on a randomization table. They are asked to follow the guidelines of the investigators during the study and to visit the hospital five times, including for screening. At each visit, the subjects will undergo an examination with doctors, a medical examination by interview, and a blood test only when it is necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the injection.

(*If the subjects performed the screening during the first visit on, the total number of his or her additional visits is four.)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Chung-Ang University Hospital
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Kunkuk University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aged 19 or older
  2. Patients with knee joint pain due to chondromalacia, osteoarthritis (OA), or traumatic arthritis (TA)
  3. Patients with 3 or lower score in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade
  4. Patients with 40 mm or higher scores in the 100 mm VAS pain scale
  5. Patients without significant pathological tests at their screening visit
  6. Patients whose medication is confirmed within one week from their study enrolment and who agreed to maintain the medication dose during the study period if they need to keep taking it
  7. When combination drugs are administered, considering the period of the drugs remaining in the body, patients who take the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to participating in the trial (based on the screening, if it is confirmed that the patients took the drugs stably for 1 week prior to the screening, at the enrollment for injection, it should be assessed again, and the patients who are confirmed to have taken the drugs stably for 2 weeks prior to the trial could be registered).
  8. Patients who, after taking drugs for anesthetic purposes (provided to the subject after the injection) within one week after the intra-articular injection, agreed to take anti-inflammatory agents for no more than 5 consecutive days and for no more than 10 days in a month, and could stop taking the drugs within 2 days after the next visit even if the pain in the observation site becomes severe and thus additional drugs are required.
  9. Patients who agreed to use only the non-drug treatments (i.e., physiotherapy, osteopathy, and chiropractic therapy) allowed by the study investigators (Acupuncture is not allowed.)
  10. Patients who agreed to receive the injection only in one knee when they feel pain on both knees (The other knee can be treated with prescribed drugs, but articular injections are not allowed.)
  11. Patients or their representative (for adults) who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients or their family members with a history of or an ongoing autoimmune disease
  2. Patients with a history of anaphylactic response
  3. Patients with hypersensitivity to grafting materials
  4. Patients with hypersensitivity to porcine protein
  5. Patient with grade 4 in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade
  6. Patients with severe effusion
  7. Patients who were injured severely or received injection in their affected knee within six months, which would make evaluation of the knee difficult
  8. Patients with inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, rupus arthrosis, or psoriatic arthritis
  9. Patients who have gout or calcium pyrophosphate (pseudogout) disease that started within six months from the screening visit
  10. Patients with a history of radiation therapy or cancer treatment within two years
  11. Patients with diabetes
  12. Patients with an infection that required hospitalization for antibiotics or the administration of antiseptic agents
  13. Patients who have been undergoing adrenocortical hormone therapy
  14. Patients with liver, heart, or kidney disease
  15. Patients who had been infected with a virus
  16. Patients who have a serious health condition that may affect the study results
  17. Patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant
  18. Patients who are considered inappropriate for participation in this study due to their condition (e.g., a mental illness) based on the investigator's judgment

    • 8-15: The investigator can decide whether or not the patient will be administered the injection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CartiZol, collagen injection
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized into the intra-articular collagen injection group based on a randomization table.
The product, CartiZol, which contains absorbable collagen, is applied on the cartilage defect to stimulate the neovasculization and cell penetration and to assist the natural wound healing process. It supplements the defective or damaged cartilage. Place the needle on the tip of the syringe and inject the product into the articular cavity.
Other Names:
  • Intra articular collagen injection
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline injection
Their eligibility to participate in the study is checked, and they are randomized into the (placebo) injection group based on a randomization table.
  1. Supplementation of fluid and electrolytes (sodium or chlorine deficiency)
  2. Diluent for injection solution Place the needle on the tip of the syringe and inject the product into the articular cavity.
Other Names:
  • placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
100 mm Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after injection

100 mm Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. In this trial, it is used for quantification of the pain on the defected knee. The VAS score of the investigational group and the control group at 24 weeks after injection will be compared and analyzed.

Score range: 0 ~ 100 mm Higher score indicates the worse outcome. In this case, participant is feeling more pain.

24 weeks after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index )
Time Frame: at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a set of standarized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC score of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be compared and analyzed.

Score range: 0 ~ 100 Higher score indicates the worse outcome.

at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection

36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient-reported survey of patient health to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment. The SF-36 score of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection will be compared and analyzed.

Score range: 0 ~ 100 Higher score indicates a better outcome.

at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Number of Patients Who Are Satisfied With Improvement Assessed by Self-evaluation
Time Frame: at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by patients at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Number of Patients With Satisfying Improvement Assessed by Physicians
Time Frame: at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
The improvement level of the investigational group and the control group will be evaluated by clinicians at the completion of clinical trial according to the 5 grade evaluation table. The difference of the improvement level (excellent+good+ moderate/total) of the two groups obtained at the completion of clinical trial will be compared and analyzed by z-test. In addition, the improvement level at each time point will be compared and analyzed.
at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
Physical Examination
Time Frame: at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection

Physical examination was performed by the investigator at each visit (baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). Selected key parameters were evaluated and categorized by severity. Each participant was assigned to a single category for each parameter at each time point, and the number of participants in each category was summarized for each arm/group.

※ Category titles are presented as: "Examination item (e.g., AP alignment)" - "Condition (e.g., varus or valgus)".

at the screening visit, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after injection
100 mm VAS
Time Frame: at the screening visit, 4 and 12 weeks after injection

100 mm Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. In this trial, it is used for quantification of the pain on the defected knee. The VAS score of the investigational group and the control group at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after injection will be compared and analyzed.

Score range: 0 ~ 100 mm Higher score indicates the worse outcome. In this case, participant is feeling more pain.

at the screening visit, 4 and 12 weeks after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Han Jun Lee, MD, Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Yong In, MD, The Catholic University of Korea
  • Principal Investigator: Kwang Jun Oh, MD, Kunkuk University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Young Wan Moon, MD, Samsung Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Hwa Sung Lee, MD, The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on CartiZol

Subscribe