Safety and Effectiveness of Bambini Kids Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) in Children With Cerebral Palsy

April 13, 2026 updated by: COSMO ROBOTICS CO., Ltd

Safety and Effectiveness of Bambini Kids Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common cause of gait impairment in children, leading to limitations in mobility and daily activities. Although conventional physical therapy is widely used, it has limitations in delivering consistent and intensive training. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) has emerged as a promising approach to provide repetitive, high-intensity, and task-specific training, with potential benefits in gait function and motor performance.

The Bambini Kids exoskeleton is a pediatric robotic device designed to assist lower-limb movements, including hip, knee, and ankle joints, to facilitate more natural gait patterns.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of Bambini Kids in children with cerebral palsy and to generate clinical evidence to support its use in real-world rehabilitation settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common causes of gait impairment in children, and it's a non-progressive neurodevelopmental disorder that results in permanent impairments in motor function and postural control. The prevalence of cerebral palsy in Korea has been reported to be approximately 2.6 per 1,000 individuals. Patients with CP experience limitations in gait and activities of daily living due to muscle spasticity, muscle weakness, and impairments in balance and coordination, which consequently lead to reduced independence and decreased quality of life.

Physical activity is essential for promoting overall health in children with cerebral palsy, and has been shown to improve stability, balance, overall motor function, and aerobic capacity, while reducing the risk of depression and enhancing key functional domains such as social participation and quality of life. To achieve these benefits, conventional physical therapy approaches, including partial body weight-supported gait training, task-oriented training, and treadmill-based training, have been widely used; however, these approaches are associated with substantial physical burden on therapists and limitations in consistently providing repetitive and high-intensity training.

To address these limitations, robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is getting attention in the field of rehabilitation. RAGT enables the consistent delivery of high-intensity and high-frequency repetitive training in accordance with physiological gait patterns and allows automatic recording of training parameters for objective analysis and comparison. In addition, some wearable exoskeleton can be applied in non-clinical settings, thereby expanding their potential use beyond hospital environments.

The therapeutic effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) have been demonstrated in adult patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke through multiple randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, showing positive impacts on gait ability, muscle strength, balance, and recovery of activities of daily living. Studies in children with cerebral palsy have also reported that RAGT has a beneficial effect on activity-related outcomes such as standing ability, gait speed, and walking distance. Early application of rehabilitation in children during developmental stages is of particular clinical importance, as it may promote neuroplasticity during periods when gait patterns and motor function remain modifiable, thereby potentially preventing long-term progression of disability. In a recent multicenter clinical study, significant improvements in gross motor function, balance control, and gait patterns were observed after 6 weeks of robot-assisted gait training, and these effects were maintained at follow-up. Borggraefe et al. reported that patients with milder impairment (GMFCS Levels I-II) showed significantly greater improvements in Gross Motor Function Measure(GMFM-88) dimensions D and E compared to those with moderate to severe impairment (GMFCS Levels III-IV). However, some studies have suggested that the relatively short duration of interventions may have led to an overestimation of treatment effects, indicating the need for further validation.

Recently, in addition to robot-assisted training in medical institutions, studies have actively investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of using exoskeleton robots in home and community settings for children with cerebral palsy. This approach has gained attention as a novel strategy to improve access to therapy and to support continuous rehabilitation in daily life.

Children with cerebral palsy frequently exhibit limitations in normal movement due to reduced joint range of motion, decreased muscle strength, and abnormal muscle tone. They often present with various gait abnormalities, such as equinus gait and crouch gait. Children with cerebral palsy frequently exhibit limitations in normal movement due to reduced joint range of motion, decreased muscle strength, and abnormal muscle tone. They often present with various gait abnormalities, such as equinus gait and crouch gait. These abnormal gait patterns may lead to secondary deformities over time; therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, in addition to conventional physical therapy, is essential in the rehabilitation of patients with cerebral palsy.

Despite these clinical characteristics, particularly those aged 2-11 years with a height of approximately 100 cm, the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of exoskeleton-based gait training in children with cerebral palsy remains limited. This is also reflected in the current regulatory status both domestically and internationally. Among 22 powered exoskeletons that have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance, only one pediatric-specific device-developed by Cyberdyne, Inc. in Japan-has been approved. Similarly, in Korea, only two exoskeletons for pediatric use (Exerciser, orthopaedic, electrically-powered or Robotic-guidance rehabilitation system) have been approved, manufactured by COSMO ROBOTICS CO., Ltd. and ANGEL ROBOTICS Co., Ltd. Among these, Bambini Kids developed by Cosmo Robotics Co., Ltd. is the only device that actively assists not only hip and knee flexion and extension, but also ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, as well as hip abduction and adduction.

To address these clinical limitations, the Bambini Kids exoskeleton has been developed with independent motors at the hip and ankle joints. In addition to the conventional assistance of hip and knee flexion and extension provided by existing exoskeleton systems, the device incorporates four additional motors to actively control ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, as well as hip abduction and adduction. This design enhances joint mobility throughout the gait cycle, ankle propulsion, and pelvic stability. As a result, the device is expected to facilitate the acquisition of more natural and symmetrical gait patterns.

Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the pediatric exoskeleton Bambini Kids in children with cerebral palsy. Based on the results, it is intended to generate evidence to support regulatory approval and clinical application in overseas markets, and to contribute to the development of strategies for expanding the use of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) across diverse real-world settings, including home and community environments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Seung Hak Lee, Associate Professor
  • Phone Number: 82 + 02) 3010-3795
  • Email: seunghak@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Seoul
      • Songpa, Seoul, South Korea, 05505
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects eligible for participation in this clinical investigation shall meet all of the following criteria.

  • Patient diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy
  • Age from 2 to 10 years old
  • Classified as Levels II to IV according to GMFCS
  • Manual Muscle Testing, MMT score of 0 to 4
  • Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS score of 3 and under
  • Subjects with sufficient cognitive function to comply with study procedures
  • Subjects with adequate upper limb function required for device use and study procedures
  • Subjects who meet the physical requirements for use of the medical device as defined by the manufacturer

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in the clinical investigation.

  • Subjects who do not meet the criteria of age, height, weight, body dimensions, or joint range of motion
  • Subjects with skin lesions, pressure sores, infections, or other conditions at area where device touches and makes difficult to use device
  • Classified as Levels V according to GMFCS
  • Subjects with severe spasticity (MAS > 3), or those at risk of significant worsening of spasticity after training.
  • Subjects unable to maintain an upright standing position for at least 15 minutes (e.g., due to autonomic dysreflexia or orthostatic hypotension)
  • Subjects with significant cardiovascular disease or a history of myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
  • Subjects with medical conditions that are contraindications for use of the medical device as defined by the manufacturer.
  • Subjects for whom weight-bearing, standing, or gait training is medically contraindicated (e.g., fractures, severe osteoporosis, severe joint deformity, or joint instability)
  • Subjects who have received treatments affecting muscle tone within the past 4 months, such as botulinum toxin injections or baclofen pump implantation
  • Subjects who experience adverse events or undesirable side effects during the clinical investigation that make continued participation difficult
  • Subjects whom the investigator judges to be unsuitable for participation or continuation in the clinical investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exoskeleton group
Apply robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) for three sessions per week, a total of 12 sessions.

This device is a powered exoskeleton intended to be worn on lower limbs affected by paralysis or weakness. It is designed to directly actuate the user's lower limb joints via integrated motors to assist or enable gait.

The subject will have intervention of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) using Bambini Kids (Cosmo Robotics Co., Ltd) for three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session, for 4 weeks.

Other Names:
  • Bambini Kids
Active Comparator: Conventional Therapy group
Apply conventional therapy for three sessions per week, a total of 12 sessions.
The subject will have intervention of one-on-one gait rehabilitation therapy with physical therapist for the same duration as treatment group (three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session, for 4 weeks)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Measure 88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at week 0, week 2, and week 4 for both treatment group and control group.

The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is a standardized observational assessment tool used to evaluate changes in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy, consisting of a total of 88 items.

Functional performance is assessed across five domains: (A) lying and rolling, (B) sitting, (C) crawling and kneeling, (D) standing, and (E) walking, running, and jumping. The score for each domain is calculated and expressed as a percentage.

Outcomes will be assessed at week 0, week 2, and week 4 for both treatment group and control group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at week 0, week 2, and week 4 for both treatment group and control group.
The time required for the subject to walk 10 meters will be measured to calculate gait speed. This test provides a simple and reliable method for objectively assessing gait ability and functional mobility.
Outcomes will be assessed at week 0, week 2, and week 4 for both treatment group and control group.
Guardian Satisfaction Assessment
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at week 4 for both treatment group and control group.

Acceptability, usability, and perceived effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training will be assessed from the caregiver's perspective using a 7-point Likert scale. The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 7 . 1-point means "Not helpful at all", and 7-point means "Very helpful".

The mean score across all items will be used as the total score. Individual item results will be reported separately, and internal consistency will be evaluated.

Outcomes will be assessed at week 4 for both treatment group and control group.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Clinical Trials on Exoskeleton

Subscribe