Prospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Complications in Medial Knee Prostheses: Fixed Bearing Versus Mobile Bearing Design (FiMo_UKP)

June 25, 2026 updated by: Lenka Stroobant, Jan Yperman Hospital
This prospective study aims to systematically compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of mobile versus fixed unicompartimental knee prostheses.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In knee surgery, two dominant designs exist for the medial unicompartmental knee prosthesis (UKP): the fixed bearing (FB) and mobile bearing (MB) designs. The FB design is technically simpler to implant but has shown higher rates of early polyethylene wear in some studies. MB implants theoretically offer advantages in joint kinematics and load distribution but carry a risk of insert dislocation and periprosthetic fractures. An additional advantage of MB implants is the possibility of cementless implantation, potentially avoiding cement-related complications and reducing operative time.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Oost-Vlaanderen
      • Ieper, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8900

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients eligible for a unicompartmental medial knee prosthesis based on the eligibility criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 50 and 80 years
  • Indication for medial UKP
  • Intact anterior cruciate ligament
  • Good bone quality based on imaging
  • ASA score ≤ 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory joint diseases
  • Collateral ligament instability
  • Simultaneous bilateral procedure
  • BMI > 35
  • History of fracture or osteotomy in the knee joint
  • Neuromuscular diseases
  • Oncological indications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Mobile UKP
Mobile unicompartmental knee prosthesis
Fixed UKP
Fixed unicompartmental knee prosthesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OKS
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.
Oxford Knee Score
Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AMI
Time Frame: Evaluate AMI (Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition) preoperative, at 6 weeks and 4 months postoperative.
Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition - DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12804 for grading
Evaluate AMI (Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition) preoperative, at 6 weeks and 4 months postoperative.
Surgery time
Time Frame: Peroperatively
Operative time
Peroperatively
Complications
Time Frame: Within 2 years postoperatively
Postoperative complications
Within 2 years postoperatively
Revision or reoperation
Time Frame: Within 2 years postoperatively
Revision or reoperation
Within 2 years postoperatively
c-FCA
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
Coronal Femoral Component Alignment - Varus/valgus alignment for the femoral component is measured on the AP radiograph in relation to the anatomical axis of the tibia. 0° degrees is considered neutral.
6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.
The 5-level EQ-5D version.
Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.
NRS
Time Frame: Preoperatively, one week, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.]
Numeric Rating Scale
Preoperatively, one week, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.]
KOOS-PS
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short form
Preoperatively, 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.
c-TCA
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
Coronal Tibial Component Alignment - Varus/valgus alignment for the tibial component is measured on the AP radiograph in relation to the anatomical axis of the tibia. 0° is considered neutral.
6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
s-FCA
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
Sagittal Femoral Component Alignment - Flexion/extension is measured on a lateral radiograph, relative to the posterior tibial cortex. A posteroinferior slope of 7° is considered neutral.
6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
s-FCA
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
Sagittal Femoral Component Alignment - Flexion/extension is measured on a lateral radiograph, relative to the posterior femoral cortex. 0° is considered neutral.
6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively
RLL
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively

Radiolucencies - Radiolucencies after UKR are divided into two types:

physiological and pathological. The former are < 2 mm thick, well defined, and accompanied by a parallel radiodense line, whereas the latter are > 2 mm thick, ill defined, and lacking accompanying radiodense lines. The pattern observed should be recorded as well as their location, which is divided into six zones on the AP view of the tibial component and six zones on the lateral view of the femoral component. Evaluation based on the zones of the Knee Society.

6 weeks and 4 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FiMO JYZ2025-10

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medial Gonarthrosis

3
Subscribe