Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Adductor Canal Block

January 13, 2019 updated by: Ahmed Hasanin, Cairo University

Effects of Peri-neural Dexmedetomidine on the Pharmacodynamic Profile of Bupivacaine-induced Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Medial Meniscectomy

This study is designed to explore the effects of peri-neural dexmedetomidine on the duration and motor sparing potentials of adductor canal block in adult patients undergoing arthroscopic medical meniscectomy in the setting of multimodal analgesia. The investigators ultimate goal is to increase the postoperative analgesic time and to preserve quadriceps muscle strength to promote safe and early ambulation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Peripheral nerve blocks using long-acting local anesthetics are commonly utilized as the sole anesthetic technique or as an adjuvant to general anesthesia for post-operative pain management. However, the duration of sensory block after single dose of long acting local anesthetics is not consistently sufficient to avoid the use of postoperative opioids. Many adjuvants were added to local anesthetics to augment the potency and prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists such as clonidine have been shown to increase the duration of peripheral nerve block. Dexmedetomidine is a more potent and selective α-2-adrenoceptor compared to clonidine. Peri-neural dexmedetomidine was evaluated in animal studies where it prolonged the duration of sensory and motor blocks of local anesthetics without any evidence of neurotoxicity for up to 14 days after initial administration. The effectiveness of perineural dexmedetomidine in augmenting the duration of sensory block of upper limb extremity blocks is based on good quality clinical evidence.

Arthroscopic knee surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain which could be adequately managed by femoral nerve block. However femoral nerve block has been associated with significant motor block and decreased quadriceps muscle strength which may delay ambulation and increase the risk of falling. More recently, adductor canal block (ACB) emerged as a selective motor sparing effective variant of femoral nerve block. Compared with baseline values, the adductor canal block reduces quadriceps muscle strength by 8%, versus 49% for the femoral nerve block. A recent dose finding MRI study reported that 20 ml of local anesthetic is the closest volume to the ED95 for adductor canal block with minimal proximal spread and an estimated success probability of 95.1% (95% credibility interval: 91-98%).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients of aged (18-45), ASA physical status I or II undergoing arthroscopic medial meniscectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unstable coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmias.
  • Baseline heart rate (HR) less than 60 beats/min or baseline systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg.
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits or neuropathy.
  • Significant psychiatric or cognitive conditions interfering with consent or assessment.
  • Significant renal or hepatic impairment;
  • Severe bronchopulmonary disease, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Known contraindications to peripheral nerve block, including local skin infections, bleeding diathesis, and coagulopathy.
  • Allergies to local anesthetics, dexmedetomidine, or any component of multimodal analgesia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine group
Adductor canal block will be performed before induction of general anesthesia. Patients will be positioned in the supine position with knee slightly flexed and leg externally rotated followed by ultrasound scanning of the middle of thigh using 13-6 MHz linear array probe. The ultrasound probe will be placed over the anterior aspect of the patient's thigh, mid-point between the inguinal crease and medial femoral condyle. The scan will be focused on the femoral artery pulsations aiming to try to visualize the nerves in the adductor canal on both sides (lateral and medial) of the pulsating femoral artery. 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% combined with 75 mcg dexmedetomidine will be injected. The study solution will be injected underneath the fascia of sartorius muscle.
to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on motor and sensory properties of adductor canal block
Other Names:
  • Precedex
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Adductor canal block will be performed before induction of general anesthesia. Patients will be positioned in the supine position with knee slightly flexed and leg externally rotated followed by ultrasound scanning of the middle of thigh using 13-6 MHz linear array probe. The ultrasound probe will be placed over the anterior aspect of the patient's thigh, mid-point between the inguinal crease and medial femoral condyle. The scan will be focused on the femoral artery pulsations aiming to try to visualize the nerves in the adductor canal on both sides (lateral and medial) of the pulsating femoral artery. 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% combined with 75 mcg dexmedetomidine will be injected. The study solution will be injected underneath the fascia of sartorius muscle.
to give normal saline to the other group as a placebo
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
the time passed till the patient first analgesic request
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
richmond agitation sedation scale
Time Frame: 24 hours
A scale to assess the patient sedation and agitation
24 hours
duration of sensory block
Time Frame: 24 hours
The time needed to regain the patient sensation
24 hours
onset of sensory block
Time Frame: minutes
A blinded investigator will assess sensory block with pinprick test every 5 min for 30 min after injection of the study medication using a 3-point scale: 0 ═ complete loss of sensation, 1 ═ partial loss of sensation and 2 ═ normal sensation. Assessment will be done in comparison to contra-lateral area
minutes
blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours
mmHg
24 hours
heart rate
Time Frame: 24 hours
beat per minutes
24 hours
onset of motor block (by assessment of quadriceps muscle strength)
Time Frame: minutes
The maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps femoris muscle will be measured using a handheld dynamometer
minutes
resting visual analogue score
Time Frame: 24 hours
the grade of pain during rest as experienced by the patient, rated from 0 to 10
24 hours
dynamic visual analogue score
Time Frame: 24 hours
the grade of pain with movement as experienced by the patient, rated from 0 to 10
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed Abdulatif, Professor, Professor and member of research committee of anesthesia department

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Medial Meniscectomy

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

3
Subscribe