Perioperative Haemostasis, Procedure-Related Pain After Physiological or Pharmacological Modifications of Local Anaesthesia Around the Eyes (P4LE)

July 30, 2026 updated by: Wu Chun Long, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Perioperative Haemostasis, Procedure-Related Pain After Physiological or Pharmacological Modifications of Local Anaesthesia Around the Eyes (P4LE) - a Double-Masked, Split-Face, Active-Controlled, Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether buffering, warming, or addition of hyaluronidase or tranexamic acid to lignocaine during eyelid injection of local anaesthesia reduce injection pain and procedure-related pain and improve perioperative haemostasis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the project is to test the hypothesis that the following modifications during subcutaneous eyelid injection of local anaesthesia, compared to 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, reduce injection pain and procedure-related pain and improve perioperative haemostasis.

  1. Buffering of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline by adding sodium bicarbonate;
  2. Warming of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline to 37°C;
  3. Addition of hyaluronidase to 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline; and
  4. Addition of tranexamic acid to 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kelvin Kam Lung Chong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anson Chun Long Wu
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • CUHK Medical Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kelvin Kam Lung Chong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty requiring subcutaneous anaesthesia at Prince of Wales Hospital, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital and CUHK Medical Centre; and
  • Adult patients aged 18 or above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged less than 18;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Allergy to local anaesthetic agents;
  • History of previous eyelid surgery; and
  • Patients on antiplatelets or anticoagulants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: First stage: Buffered
One eyelid: lignocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate; the other eyelid: unmodified solution of lignocaine
Lignocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Experimental: First stage: Warmed
One eyelid: lignocaine warmed to body temperature; the other eyelid: unmodified solution of lignocaine at room temperature
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine warmed to body temperature
Experimental: First stage: Hyaluronidase
One eyelid: lignocaine with hyaluronidase added; the other eyelid: unmodified solution of lignocaine
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine with hyaluronidase added
Experimental: First stage: Tranexamic acid
One eyelid: lignocaine with tranexamic acid added; the other eyelid: unmodified solution of lignocaine
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine with tranexamic acid added
Experimental: Second stage: Most effective modification A versus B
One eyelid: modification A; the other eyelid: modification B
Lignocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine warmed to body temperature
Lignocaine with hyaluronidase added
Lignocaine with tranexamic acid added
Experimental: Second stage: Most effective modification A+B versus A
One eyelid: modification A+B; the other eyelid: modification A
Lignocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine warmed to body temperature
Lignocaine with hyaluronidase added
Lignocaine with tranexamic acid added
Experimental: Second stage: Most effective modification A+B versus B
One eyelid: modification A+B; the other eyelid: modification B
Lignocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate
2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline
Lignocaine warmed to body temperature
Lignocaine with hyaluronidase added
Lignocaine with tranexamic acid added

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain of injection of local anaesthesia
Time Frame: Within 1 minute after injection of local anaesthesia
Pain of injection of local anaesthesia, measured by a pain rating visual analogue scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10 (10 refers to worst pain)
Within 1 minute after injection of local anaesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain encountered during the surgery
Time Frame: Within 15 minutes after surgery
Pain encountered during the surgery, measured by a pain rating visual analogue scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10 (10 refers to worst pain)
Within 15 minutes after surgery
Pain encountered one week after surgery
Time Frame: One week after surgery
Pain encountered one week after surgery, measured by a pain rating visual analogue scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10 (10 refers to worst pain)
One week after surgery
Postoperative ecchymosis at one week after surgery
Time Frame: One week after surgery
Postoperative ecchymosis at one week after surgery, rated based on clinical photos using a standardised rating score of minimum 0 to maximum 5 (5 refers to worst ecchymosis)
One week after surgery
Postoperative swelling at one week after surgery
Time Frame: One week after surgery
Postoperative swelling at one week after surgery, rated based on clinical photos using a standardised rating score of minimum 0 to maximum 5 (5 refers to worst swelling)
One week after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kelvin Kam Lung Chong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Anson Chun Long Wu, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request starting from the conclusion of the study to five years after study closure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe