Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Traditionel versus tidlig aggressiv terapi for multipel sklerose (TREAT-MS)

22. september 2026 opdateret af: Johns Hopkins University

Et pragmatisk forsøg til evaluering af virkningerne på mellemlang sigt af tidlig, aggressiv versus eskaleringsterapi hos mennesker med multipel sklerose

FDA-approved multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) target the relapsing phase of MS but have minimal impact once the progressive phase has begun. It is unclear if, in the relapsing phase, there is an advantage of early aggressive therapy with respect to preventing long-term disability. The infectious risks and other complications associated with higher-efficacy treatments highlight the need to quantify their effectiveness in preventing disability.

The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that has two primary aims: 1) to evaluate, jointly and independently among patients deemed at higher risk vs. lower risk for disability accumulation, whether an "early aggressive" therapy approach, versus starting with a traditional, first-line therapy, influences the intermediate-term risk of disability, and 2) to evaluate if, among patients deemed at lower risk for disability who start on first-line MS therapies but experience breakthrough disease, those who switch to a higher-efficacy versus a new first-line therapy have different intermediate-term risk of disability.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Afsluttet

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

FDA-approved multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) target the relapsing phase of MS but have minimal impact once the progressive phase has begun. It is unclear if, in the relapsing phase, there is an advantage of early aggressive therapy with respect to preventing long-term disability. The infectious risks and other complications associated with higher-efficacy treatments highlight the need to quantify their effectiveness in preventing disability.

The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that has two primary aims: 1) to evaluate, jointly and independently among patients deemed at higher risk vs. lower risk for disability accumulation, whether an "early aggressive" therapy approach, versus starting with a traditional, first-line therapy, influences the intermediate-term risk of disability, and 2) to evaluate if, among patients deemed at lower risk for disability who start on first-line MS therapies but experience breakthrough disease, those who switch to a higher-efficacy versus a new first-line therapy have different intermediate-term risk of disability.

Hypotheses/Objectives: The main hypothesis is that intermediate-term disability will be reduced by earlier use of higher-efficacy medications. Additional objectives include a) evaluating the magnitude of the treatment effect in patients deemed to be at higher risk versus lower risk of longer-term disability (we hypothesize that the effect size will be greater in the former group) and b) evaluating if, among those without indications of a high risk of longer-term disability, breakthrough disease can be successfully managed by switching to a different first-line therapy or if escalation is required at that time (we hypothesize that switching to a higher-efficacy therapy will be more effective in preventing disability in this group).

There is a great unmet need to identify the most appropriate treatment strategy for people with MS, especially early in the disease course when it may be possible to maximize an individual's chance for preventing long-term disability. There is a paucity of evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians, patients, and payers determine which treatment strategy is best for an individual with MS. Making treatment decisions is a daunting task, and the individualized benefit-risk assessment becomes increasingly difficult as new therapies emerge. Without the availability of direct comparative trials, clinicians and patients are forced to scrutinize observational studies that only provide basic insights into what may be the best treatment path moving forward. It is equally challenging to define what constitutes a suboptimal response to a DMT for an individual patient. Clinicians lack guidance on when to switch therapies and whether to consider a different first-line or if clinicians should escalate immediately to higher-efficacy therapies, so further consensus is needed to determine the optimal time to switch therapies and escalate therapy if an individual is on a first-line therapy from the start. The TREAT-MS trial will help inform patients and the broader health care community on whether patients would most benefit from early, possibly more risky aggressive therapy or if starting with a less aggressive (and, often, less risky) therapy, followed by a switch if breakthrough disease occurs, is warranted. In addition, this study may help identify specific patient populations and/or short-term clinical and paraclinical biomarkers that are strongly predictive of long-term disability that can ensue from MS.

Accrual of sustained disability is the most feared complication for people with MS, and the patient's own perception of their well-being or ill-being has a profound impact on their quality of life. The heterogeneity and unpredictability of MS, along with lack of agreed upon treatment guidelines, augments this fear, leading to a significant negative impact on quality of life. Even patients who are deemed to have "mild" MS experience a significant negative impact on their health-related quality of life that is similar in magnitude to what patients with other severe chronic conditions (i.e., congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) report. An extremely important goal for any intervention is to help improve or maintain a high quality of life; therefore, in addition to classic clinical endpoints (e.g. slowing disability progression), the TREAT-MS trial will capture several important and meaningful PROs that will shed light on what treatment strategies may be the best from a patient-centered perspective.

COVID-19 Related Substudy:

Since early 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused clinical care and research disruptions nationwide, including for patients enrolled in the TREAT-MS trial. Many patients with MS, as well as their clinicians, are fearful that MS or the MS therapy they are using may increase the risk or severity of COVID-19 infection. Whether a person with early MS is more likely to experience more severe COVID-19 if treated with a higher-efficacy therapy is not known. Further, whether COVID-19-induced disruptions in therapy or other clinical care increase MS disease activity or MS symptoms is not clear but is relevant, particularly since greater MS activity in the early therapeutic course is associated in observational studies with worse long-term outcomes. Moreover, it is unclear if pre-pandemic anxiety and depression, common comorbidities in people with MS, contribute to decisions to delay care, overall or differently depending on therapeutic strategy (higher-efficacy vs. traditional). TREAT-MS provides an optimal cohort in which to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on MS outcomes.

COVID-19 Substudy Aim 1. To evaluate if patients enrolled in TREAT-MS delayed or altered their disease-modifying therapy schedule or other MS care, and whether such alterations are associated with a greater degree of breakthrough inflammatory disease activity or the development of new (or worsening baseline) MS symptoms.

COVID-19 Substudy Aim 2: To evaluate if patients with MS treated with higher-efficacy, versus traditional, therapies differ in the risk of severe COVID-19 infection, defined as requiring hospitalization (with or without intubation) or mortality due to COVID-19.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
900

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Forenede Stater, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
      • Mobile, Alabama, Forenede Stater, 36604
        • The University of South Alabama
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, Forenede Stater, 85013
        • St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center - Barrow Neurological Institute
    • California
      • Carmichael, California, Forenede Stater, 95608
        • CommonSpirit Health Research Institute
      • Los Angeles, California, Forenede Stater, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
      • Los Angeles, California, Forenede Stater, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
      • San Diego, California, Forenede Stater, 92037
        • University of California, San Diego
      • San Francisco, California, Forenede Stater, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, Forenede Stater, 19713
        • Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Forenede Stater, 20007
        • Georgetown University
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Forenede Stater, 32611
        • University of Florida
      • Miami, Florida, Forenede Stater, 33136
        • University of Miami
      • Tampa, Florida, Forenede Stater, 33612
        • University of South Florida Health
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Forenede Stater, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, Forenede Stater, 66160
        • The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC)
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Forenede Stater, 40207
        • Norton Neurology MS Services
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Forenede Stater, 21287
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Forenede Stater, 21201
        • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts Medical School
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Forenede Stater, 48109
        • University of Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, Forenede Stater, 48201
        • Wayne State University
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Forenede Stater, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, Forenede Stater, 59101
        • Billings Clinic
      • Great Falls, Montana, Forenede Stater, 59405
        • Advanced Neurology Specialists
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, Forenede Stater, 68198
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, Forenede Stater, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 45219
        • University of Cincinnati
      • Columbus, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 43214
        • OhioHealth Research Institute
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Forenede Stater, 73104
        • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, Forenede Stater, 97225
        • Providence Health and Services - Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 17822
        • Geisinger Clinic
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 15212
        • Allegheny Health Network Research Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Forenede Stater, 37215
        • Vanderbilt Comprehensive MS Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, Forenede Stater, 75246
        • Baylor Scott and White Health
      • Dallas, Texas, Forenede Stater, 75390-8806
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
      • Round Rock, Texas, Forenede Stater, 78681
        • Central Texas Neurology Consultants
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, Forenede Stater, 84108
        • University of Utah
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, Forenede Stater, 05405
        • The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College
    • Virginia
      • Christiansburg, Virginia, Forenede Stater, 24073
        • Blacksburg Neurology
      • Norfolk, Virginia, Forenede Stater, 23502
        • Neurology Consultants of Tidewater
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forenede Stater, 98122
        • Swedish Health Services
      • Seattle, Washington, Forenede Stater, 98133
        • University of Washington
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Forenede Stater, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 60 år (Voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-60 years
  • Meets 2017 McDonald criteria for relapsing-remitting MS [patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) are not eligible]
  • Must be EITHER John Cunningham (JC) virus antibody negative or low positive (index antibody titer <0.9), OR negative for: Hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis
  • HIV negative
  • No chemotherapy in past year; if patient has prior history of chemotherapy or malignancy, documentation in chart explaining why potential risks of higher-efficacy therapy are justified

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone or cladribine
  • Prior treatment with any other MS DMT for more than 6 months
  • Prior treatment with experimental aggressive therapies (e.g., T-cell vaccine, total lymphoid radiation, stem cells)
  • Treatment with teriflunomide within past 2 years (even for ≤ 6 months), unless rapid wash out done (i.e., with cholestyramine or activated charcoal)
  • Treatment in the past 6 months with any MS DMT
  • Prior treatment with any other investigational immune-modulating /suppressing drug for MS not listed above
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Women of child-bearing age who are planning or strongly considering conception during the study time frame

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Aktiv komparator: Early Aggressive Therapy

Early Aggressive Therapy choices and maximum allowable doses:

  • Natalizumab/natalizumab-sztn (Tysabri/Tyruko), 300 mg IV q 4 wks
  • Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), 12 mg IV daily (QD) for 5 days; 1 yr later: 12 mg IV QD for 3 days
  • Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), 300 mg IV every 2 wks (for 2 doses) at initiation; 600 mg IV q 6 mths
  • Rituximab/rituximab biosimilars (Rituxan/Riabni/Truxima/Ruxience), 1000 mg IV every 2 wks (for 2 doses); may repeat q 16-24 wks
  • Cladribine (Mavenclad), 3.5 mg per kg body wt orally divided into 2 yrly tmt courses (1.75 mg per kg body wt each yr); yrly tmt course divided into 2 tmt cycles; administer cycle dose as 1-2 tablets QD over 4-5 days
  • Ofatumumab (Kesimpta), 20 mg SC wkly for wks 0, 1 and 2; 20 mg subcutaneously (SC) mthly starting at wk 4
  • Ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi), 150 mg IV (1st dose); 450 mg IV 2 wks after first dose; 450 mg IV q 24 wks
  • Ocrelizumab and hyaluronidase-ocsq (Ocrevus Zunovo), 920 mg ocrelizumab and 23,000 U hyaluronidase SC q 6 months
Andet: Natalizumab/natalizumab-sztn, Alemtuzumab, Ocrelizumab, Rituximab/rituximab-arrx/rituximab-abbs/rituximab-pvvr, Cladribine, Ofatumumab, Ublituximab-xiiy, Ocrelizumab and hyaluronidase-ocsq

Early Aggressive Therapy

Andre navne:
  • Tysabri, Lemtrada, Ocrevus, Rituxan/Riabni/Truxima/Ruxience, Mavenclad, Kesimpta, Briumvi, Ocrevus Zunovo
Aktiv komparator: Traditional Therapy

Traditional Therapy choices and maximum allowable doses:

  • Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone, Glatopa, and other generics), 20 mg SC daily, or 40 mg SC 3 times a wk
  • Intramuscular (IM) interferon (Avonex), 30 mcg IM weekly
  • SC interferon (Betaseron, Extavia, Rebif), 0.25 mg SC every other day (Betaseron, Extavia); 44 mcg SC 3 times a wk (Rebif)
  • Pegylated interferon (Plegridy), 125 mcg SC every 14 days
  • Teriflunomide (Aubagio), 14 mg PO QD
  • Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera and generics), 240 mg PO twice a day (BID)
  • Diroximel fumarate (Vumerity), 462 mg PO BID
  • Monomethyl fumarate (Bafiertam), 190 mg PO BID
  • Fingolimod (Gilenya and generics), 0.5 mg PO QD
  • Siponimod (Mayzent), 1 mg PO QD or 2 mg PO QD
  • Ozanimod (Zeposia), 0.92 mg PO QD
  • Ponesimod (Ponvory), 20 mg PO QD
  • Fingolimod ODT (Tascenso), 0.25 mg PO QD if <=40 kg; 0.5 mg PO QD if > 40 kg
Andet: Glatiramer acetate, Interferons (intramuscular, subcutaneous, pegylated) Teriflunomide, Fumarates (dimethyl, diroximel, monomethyl) Fingolimod, Siponimod, Ozanimod, Ponesimod

Traditional Therapy

Andre navne:
  • Copaxone, Glatopa, Avonex, Betaseron, Extavia, Rebif, Plegridy, Aubagio, Tecfidera, Vumerity, Bafiertam, Gilenya, Mayzent, Zeposia, Ponvory, Tascenso

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time to sustained disability progression
Tidsramme: From date of randomization until the date of first documented sustained disability progression, up to 99 months

Time to sustained disability progression is measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale plus (EDSS+): a composite endpoint that includes EDSS change (change at any 6 month time point of > or = 1.0 point if baseline EDSS is < or = 5.5 or of > or = 0.5 if baseline EDSS is > or = 6.0, that is sustained 6 months later) OR 20% worsening on either of two specific components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FWT) and the nine hole peg test (9HPT) that is sustained 6 months later.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented sustained disability progression, up to 99 months
Change in Overall Burden of MS
Tidsramme: up to 48 weeks from enrollment into COVID-19 related substudy

The change in overall burden of MS will be defined for the COVID-19 related substudy as the occurrence of breakthrough disease (relapses or new MRI activity) or the development of new (or worsening baseline) MS symptoms, which are (for TREAT-MS) and will continue to be (during the substudy) documented at clinical visits, whether in-person or on tele-visits.
up to 48 weeks from enrollment into COVID-19 related substudy

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS)
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

PDDS is a self-assessment scale of disability due to MS on a scale from 0 to 8 and will be administered as an electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO).
up to 99 months
Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Composite Score
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The MSFC consists of the timed 25 foot walk test, the 9-hole peg test, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and a composite MSFC z-score will be evaluated.
up to 99 months
Timed 25 Foot Walk Test
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Time taken to complete the timed 25 foot walk test, measured twice in units of seconds, will be averaged and evaluated.
up to 99 months
Nine-hole Peg Test
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Time taken to complete the nine-hole peg test, measured twice for each hand (dominant and non-dominant) in units of seconds, will be averaged for each hand and evaluated.
up to 99 months
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The paced auditory serial addition test that measures processing speed will be administered once; number and percent correct will be evaluated.
up to 99 months
Low contrast visual acuity
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Low-contrast letter acuity (binocular, 2.5% contrast Sloan charts)
up to 99 months
Patient-reported incomplete relapse recovery
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Among participants identified to have a relapse, relapse recovery will be defined as complete or incomplete based on patient self-report.
up to 99 months
Neurologic exam-based incomplete relapse recovery
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Among participants identified to have a relapse, relapse recovery will be defined as complete or incomplete based on neurologic examination (those who have increased Functional System scores, corresponding to the relapse symptoms, of 1.0 point or greater for at least 6 months after the relapse onset, without subsequent accrual of worsening in that same Functional System (e.g. more indicative of progression), will be considered to have incomplete relapse recovery).
up to 99 months
Cognition using Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The SDMT is commonly used in MS to assess processing speed and will be administered orally and used to evaluate changes in cognition throughout the study.
up to 99 months
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The MSIS-29 will be used to evaluate the impact of MS on the participants and will be administered as an electronic PRO.Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) is an instrument used for measuring the physical (20 items) and psychological (nine items) impact of multiple sclerosis.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Anxiety Subscale
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Anxiety Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Depression Subscale
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Depression Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Fatigue Subscale
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Fatigue Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Upper Extremity Function
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Upper Extremity Function Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Lower Extremity Function
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Lower Extremity Function Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Cognitive Function
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Cognitive Function Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Positive Affect/Well-being
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Positive Affect/Well-being Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Sleep Disturbance
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Sleep Disturbance Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Stigma
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The Stigma Subscale of Neuro-QoL will be administered as an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Employment status
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

The incidence of change in employment to "disabled" or "looking for work, unemployed," will be evaluated for all participants through an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Marital status
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Incident divorce or separation, among those who previously were married or in a domestic partnership, will be evaluated for all participants through an electronic PRO.
up to 99 months
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

SAEs (clinically significant infections, malignancies, or the development of other serious comorbidities, as well as unplanned hospitalizations [for non-elective issues, excluding MS relapse] and death)
up to 99 months
Adverse event resulting in a decision to change disease-modifying therapy
Tidsramme: up to 99 months

Adverse events meaningful enough to lead to medication discontinuation
up to 99 months
Severe COVID-19 Infection
Tidsramme: up to 48 weeks from enrollment into COVID-19 related substudy

Severe COVID-19 infection will be defined as an outcome of "hospitalization or death" due to confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection
up to 48 weeks from enrollment into COVID-19 related substudy

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Johns Hopkins University

Samarbejdspartnere

Samarbejdspartnere

En anden organisation end sponsoren, der yder støtte til en klinisk undersøgelse. Denne støtte kan omfatte aktiviteter relateret til finansiering, design, implementering, dataanalyse eller rapportering.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Ledende efterforsker: Ellen M. Mowry, MD, MCR, Johns Hopkins University
  • Ledende efterforsker: Scott D. Newsome, DO, Johns Hopkins University

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
2. maj 2018

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
31. juli 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
31. august 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
21. februar 2018

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
12. april 2018

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
18. april 2018

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
23. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
22. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • IRB00143534

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger