Returnering af genomiske resultater og aggregeret penetrering i befolkningsbaserede kohorter (PopSeq)
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Formålet med dette projekt er at: 1) Returnere klinisk brugbare genomiske resultater til deltagerne og spore resultater. Blandt nulevende FHS/JHS-deltagere, som har givet samtykke til gRoR, vil vi kontakte dem, hos hvem der opdages en skadelig handlingsbar variant i et af generne, der er noteret på ACMG's anbefalede sekundære fundliste (estimeret 2% af deltagerne). 2) Forbedre high-throughput metoder til at identificere valid patogen variation. Forfin og anvende metoder til screening med høj kapacitet af FHS/JHS-genomer på en måde, der bevarer høj følsomhed til påvisning af skadelige varianter i ~3500 gener, der er forbundet med Mendelian sygdom, samtidig med at den falske opdagelsesrate af varianter, der ikke er patogene/sandsynligt patogene, reduceres. 3) Udforsk samlet penetrering for Mendelske sygdomme. Gennemgå fænotypedata fra en undergruppe af FHS- og JHS-deltagere og sammenlign dette med genotypiske data.
Data, der skal indsamles, omfatter udfald og fænotypiske data om de personer, der accepterer gRoR, og som erfarer, at de har en skadelig variant i et af generne på ACMG-listen. Disse data vil blive selvrapporteret gennem undersøgelser, og tilgængelige lægejournaler vil blive gennemgået. Yderligere fænotypiske data kan indsamles og gennemgås for andre ikke-handlingsbare mendelske sygdomsgener for at udforske genomisk penetrans.
Forskningsdeltagere, som er identificeret med en skadelig variant i et handlingsbart gen, kan få direkte sundhedsmæssige fordele ved at lære denne information; dog kan returnering af genomiske resultater til raske individer, der ikke præsenterer for en medicinsk indikation, udgøre uventede skader relateret til variant-rettede stigninger i screening og behandling. Denne undersøgelse er fokuseret på at udforske fordelene og eventuelle skader relateret til returnering af genomisk information i populationsbaserede kohorter. Det vil også give os mulighed for bedre at forstå penetreringen af disse varianter i to populationer, der ikke er udvalgt til sygdomsstatus, og vil give os mulighed for at sammenligne resultater i en primært afroamerikansk befolkning vs en kaukasisk befolkning. Udvikling af metoder til at strømline variantanalyse vil hjælpe med at forbedre laboratorieeffektiviteten og vil fremskride inden for variantkuration og analyse.
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Framingham, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 01702
- Framingham Heart Study
-
-
Mississippi
-
Jackson, Mississippi, Forenede Stater, 39213
- Jackson Heart Study
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inklusionskriterier:
- Levende individer tilmeldt Framingham Heart Study og Jackson Heart Study, som har fået sekventeret deres genomer som en del af TOPMed-programmet.
- Voksne over 18 år
- Dem, der har givet samtykke til at få deres DNA-prøver brugt til forskningsformål (og dem, der deltager i gRoR, som har givet samtykke til at modtage genomisk information).
Ekskluderingskriterier:
- Deltagere i Framingham Heart Study eller Jackson Heart Study, som ikke har fået sekventeret deres genomer som en del af TOPMed
- Deltagere, der ikke valgte genomisk/genetisk forskning
- Deltagere, der har/ikke har givet samtykke til at modtage et genomisk resultat (kun for denne undersøgelses gRoR-del)
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Forebyggelse
- Tildeling: N/A
- Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: FHS & JHS deltagere med et handlingsdygtigt genomisk fund
Deltagere i Framingham og Jackson Heart Study, som har fået sekventeret deres genomer som en del af TOPMed, vil blive underrettet, hvis et handlingsegnet genetisk resultat i et ACMG v2.0-gen identificeres, og vil blive tilbudt muligheden for at få deres forskningsresultat klinisk bekræftet af undersøgelsen.
|
Helgenomsekventering og rapportering af handlingsegnede genomiske resultater for gener inkluderet på ACMG's sekundære fundliste.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Follow Through With Disclosure
Tidsramme: From genetic result notification to 8 months post-disclosure
|
Living JHS/FHS participants sequenced as part of the TOPMed program who were notified about an actionable genetic result that warranted having the research result verified who followed through with having their result confirmed and disclosed to their health care provider.
|
From genetic result notification to 8 months post-disclosure
|
|
Total Costs of Program Implementation
Tidsramme: From the initiation of bioinformatics analysis to disclosure of confirmed actionable genetic finding (approximately 6 months).
|
We will determine the costs and associated time demands of implementing gRoR using a microcosting approach in which study staff track the amount of time they spend and the resources they use for each step of the protocol.
Ranges are based on 50% to 200% of point estimates given variability in wages and prices of services.
|
From the initiation of bioinformatics analysis to disclosure of confirmed actionable genetic finding (approximately 6 months).
|
|
Costs of Follow-Up Care
Tidsramme: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
For follow-up medical care, we use a gross costing approach where we apply Centers for Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules to participant-reported referrals and tests.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Guideline Compliance
Tidsramme: At the time of disclosure of confirmed findings (approximately 3 months after initial results notification)
|
Number of participants with actionable genetic results who, per the judgement of a genetic specialist, had already met clinical criteria for genetic testing based on their personal and family histories of disease.
|
At the time of disclosure of confirmed findings (approximately 3 months after initial results notification)
|
|
New and Modified Diagnoses
Tidsramme: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results);1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 1 year to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
We will examine cases to determine the percentage of individuals who report a new or modified diagnosis attributed to results disclosure.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results);1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 1 year to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Self-Rated Health
Tidsramme: Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
A single item of self rated health derived from the SF-12v2.
|
Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Number of Participants With Recommendations to Referrals or Services During Clinical Disclosure Sessions
Tidsramme: From disclosure to 1 month post-disclosure
|
We reviewed chart notes from results disclosure sessions to determine whether referrals or services were recommended in response to genetic findings.
|
From disclosure to 1 month post-disclosure
|
|
Health Care Utilization
Tidsramme: 1 year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Health care utilization in response to results disclosure reported by participants in the one year follow-up survey, including referrals, tests and/or procedures, and changes to medications.
|
1 year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Andre resultatmål
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Reported Changes to Health Behaviors
Tidsramme: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
A series of standardized yes/no questions that assess whether disclosed genetic information motivated participants to make changes to health behaviors, including diet, exercise, dietary supplements use, alcohol use, stress management, and smoking.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Disclosure-specific Impact
Tidsramme: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed the disclosure-specific impact of information on distress and positive emotions using an adapted 12-item version of the FaCTOR, a validated instrument developed for genomic sequencing that is sensitive to responses to high- and low-risk genetic risk results.
Subscales assess negative emotions (range: 3 to 15), positive feelings (reverse-scored, range: 4 to 20), uncertainty (range: 3 to 15), and privacy concerns (range: 2 to 10), with higher scores on each subscale indicating more negative experiences.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Satisfaction With Disclosure
Tidsramme: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Surveys assessed how helpful participants felt the results disclosure session was using a novel single question.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Decisional Regret
Tidsramme: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Surveys assessed if participants regretted their decisions to receive their genetic findings using a novel single question.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Sharing With Relatives
Tidsramme: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed with whether participants shared their genetic information with relatives .
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Family Testing
Tidsramme: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed whether participants had relatives that received genetic testing based on disclosure to the participant.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
General Anxiety
Tidsramme: Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
We measure general anxiety using a 4-item version of the General Anxiety Disorder Scale, a validated scale that allows investigators to identify individuals with a potential mood disorder.
Scores range from 4 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
|
Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Samarbejdspartnere
Samarbejdspartnere
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Wolf SM, Branum R, Koenig BA, Petersen GM, Berry SA, Beskow LM, Daly MB, Fernandez CV, Green RC, LeRoy BS, Lindor NM, O'Rourke PP, Breitkopf CR, Rothstein MA, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
- Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J, Kapur V, Keane MA, Koenig BA, Leroy BS, McFarland EG, Paradise J, Parker LS, Terry SF, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x.
- Vassy JL, Lautenbach DM, McLaughlin HM, Kong SW, Christensen KD, Krier J, Kohane IS, Feuerman LZ, Blumenthal-Barby J, Roberts JS, Lehmann LS, Ho CY, Ubel PA, MacRae CA, Seidman CE, Murray MF, McGuire AL, Rehm HL, Green RC; MedSeq Project. The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials. 2014 Mar 20;15:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-85.
- McLaughlin HM, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Christensen KD, Kohane IS, Krier J, Lane WJ, Lautenbach D, Lebo MS, Machini K, MacRae CA, Azzariti DR, Murray MF, Seidman CE, Vassy JL, Green RC, Rehm HL; MedSeq Project. A systematic approach to the reporting of medically relevant findings from whole genome sequencing. BMC Med Genet. 2014 Dec 14;15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12881-014-0134-1.
- Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Schonman EF, Blout CL, Robinson JO, Krier JB, Diamond PM, Lebo M, Machini K, Azzariti DR, Dukhovny D, Bates DW, MacRae CA, Murray MF, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC; MedSeq Project. The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 27;167(3):159-169. doi: 10.7326/M17-0188. Print 2017 Aug 1.
- Christensen KD, Vassy JL, Phillips KA, Blout CL, Azzariti DR, Lu CY, Robinson JO, Lee K, Douglas MP, Yeh JM, Machini K, Stout NK, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC, Dukhovny D; MedSeq Project. Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial. Genet Med. 2018 Dec;20(12):1544-1553. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.35. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
- Lupo PJ, Robinson JO, Diamond PM, Jamal L, Danysh HE, Blumenthal-Barby J, Lehmann LS, Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Green RC, McGuire AL; MedSeq Project team. Patients' perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project. Per Med. 2016 Jan 1;13(1):13-20. doi: 10.2217/pme.15.45. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
- Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1408914. No abstract available.
- Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, Lawrenz F, Kahn JP, Beskow LM, Cho MK, Christman MF, Green RC, Hall R, Illes J, Keane M, Knoppers BM, Koenig BA, Kohane IS, Leroy B, Maschke KJ, McGeveran W, Ossorio P, Parker LS, Petersen GM, Richardson HS, Scott JA, Terry SF, Wilfond BS, Wolf WA. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):361-84. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.23.
- Burke W, Evans BJ, Jarvik GP. Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):105-11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31393. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group; Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, Puggal M, Beskow LM, Biesecker LG, Bookman E, Burke W, Burchard EG, Church G, Clayton EW, Eckfeldt JH, Fernandez CV, Fisher R, Fullerton SM, Gabriel S, Gachupin F, James C, Jarvik GP, Kittles R, Leib JR, O'Donnell C, O'Rourke PP, Rodriguez LL, Schully SD, Shuldiner AR, Sze RK, Thakuria JV, Wolf SM, Burke GL. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.
- Natarajan P, Gold NB, Bick AG, McLaughlin H, Kraft P, Rehm HL, Peloso GM, Wilson JG, Correa A, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Kathiresan S, Green RC. Aggregate penetrance of genomic variants for actionable disorders in European and African Americans. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 9;8(364):364ra151. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2367.
- Christensen KD, Phillips KA, Green RC, Dukhovny D. Cost Analyses of Genomic Sequencing: Lessons Learned from the MedSeq Project. Value Health. 2018 Sep;21(9):1054-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- Roberts JS, Robinson JO, Diamond PM, Bharadwaj A, Christensen KD, Lee KB, Green RC, McGuire AL; MedSeq Project team. Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.223. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
- Christensen KD, Dukhovny D, Siebert U, Green RC. Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing. J Pers Med. 2015 Dec 10;5(4):470-86. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040470.
- Machini K, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Azzariti DR, Sharma H, Rossetti P, Mahanta L, Hutchinson L, McLaughlin H; MedSeq Project; Green RC, Lebo M, Rehm HL. Analyzing and Reanalyzing the Genome: Findings from the MedSeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
- Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, McGuire AL, Nussbaum RL, O'Daniel JM, Ormond KE, Rehm HL, Watson MS, Williams MS, Biesecker LG; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):565-74. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
- Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, Herman GE, Hufnagel SB, Klein TE, Korf BR, McKelvey KD, Ormond KE, Richards CS, Vlangos CN, Watson M, Martin CL, Miller DT. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- R01HL143295 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .