Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Generel anæstesi vs bevidst sedation til radial endobronchial ultralyd (RESSOURCE)

4. november 2026 opdateret af: Marc Fortin, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Et randomiseret kontrolleret forsøg med generel anæstesi vs bevidst sedation i radial endobronchial ultralyd til perifere lungelæsioner

The endoscopic investigation of lung lesions is experiencing significant growth with the increasing number of lung cancer screening programs. Peripheral endobronchial ultrasound (pEBUS) is the most widely used endoscopic technique in the investigation of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL). It is performed in relatively equal proportions under conscious sedation and general anesthesia by interventional pulmonologists throughout the world. Users of conscious sedation justify themselves by the fewer resources consumed and the absence of demonstration of a superior diagnostic yield of general anesthesia while users of general anesthesia claim diagnostic yield and comfort for the patient are superior with their approach. Our main objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of pEBUS under general anesthesia to that obtained under conscious sedation.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Rekruttering

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This is a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the diagnostic yield of pEBUS under general anesthesia and conscious sedation in the context of the investigation of peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Participants will be recruited prospectively. Potential participants will be identified during the screening of procedure requisitions by the interventional pulmonology team. The participant will then be approached by the physician to obtain their consent to the procedure and the study during a first visit, which can be face-to-face, by phone or by telemedicine. During this visit, the research protocol and the risks involved will be explained to the participant by the physician to obtain their free and informed consent for both. After verifying eligibility criteria and obtaining consent, participants will be included in the study and randomized. Participants will be randomized to the type of sedation for the procedure (general anesthesia or conscious sedation) and the procedure can, then, be scheduled with the sedation mode assigned during randomization. During a second visit, which may take place on the same day as the first, the participant will undergo pEBUS under conscious sedation or general anesthesia depending on the group to which he was randomized. Prior to discharge, the participant's comfort questionnaires will be administered. One month after the procedure, the research team will consult the participant's medical record to review the results of the samples taken during the examination and to ensure that the participant have not suffered any late complications following the procedure. The patient will be instructed to contact the research team again if they believe they have had a late complication. The record will subsequently be reviewed at 1 and 2 years if the procedure is not diagnostic to validate the final clinical diagnosis of the treating team. Communication of the results and further treatment of the patient will be the responsibility of the referring physician or his team and not that of the research team.

In both groups, an ultrathin or thin bronchoscope (eg.: MP109 or P180/190 bronchosscope, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a radial EBUS probe (eg.: UM-S20-17S or 20R-3, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) will be used. A guidesheath can be used when performing pEBUS procedures with a thin bronchoscope but not when using an ultrathin. Each center will determine before beginning recruitment for the study whether a thin bronchoscope with or without guidesheath or an ultrathin bronchoscope without guidesheat will be used.

Centers must systematically use the same type of bronchoscope and guidesheath for all participants recruited according to their predetermined conduct. Minimally, a wash, forceps and a brush will be performed to sample lesion. Forceps biopsies will be taken until five macroscopically visible specimens are obtained, up to a maximum of 8 attempts. A single brushing as well as a cytological bronchoalveolar washing, of at least 50ml, will be carried out. At the discretion of the center, a peripheral needle for fine needle aspiration (FNA) may also be used (eg. Periview, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). If used, 3 passes will be performed, but additional passes are permitted at the discretion of the endoscopist and depending on the material obtained macroscopically. Each center will determine before beginning recruitment for the study whether or not it will use FNA. Centers must systematically use it or not, for all participants recruited according to local predetermined sampling protocol.

A 1.1mm cryoprobe (Erbe, Tuebingen, Germany) can also be used at the discretion of the endoscopist. Cryobiopsies do not have to be performed or not performed in all participants in a center, in contrast to FNA, and can be used at the discretion of the bronchoscopist. Cryobiopsies may be used systematically in both arms of the study in a participating center. This latitude with the use of cryobiopsies is explained by the higher risk associated with cryobiopsies and the strong conviction of certain centers in the selective use of this technique (eg eccentric image of pEBUS). A minimum of 3 and a maxmimum of 5 cryobiopsies will be performed when using the cryoprobe.

The sequence of use of sampling tools will be at the discretion of the endoscopist. Rapid on-site examination (ROSE) may be used, but must be used systematically for every case in both arms of the study at the participating center. Each center will determine before beginning recruitment for the study whether it will use ROSE or not, as for FNA.

If systematic lymph node staging is performed, it will be performed after peripheral EBUS. ROSE may or may not be used for lymph node sampling.

Randomization will be carried out at the end of the first visit to allow the logistical organization of the second visit, which includes the intervention. A 1:1 randomization, stratified for center and the presence of a bronchus sign will be performed. A bronchus sign will be defined by the presence of a bronchus leading directly to the lesion. Randomization will be centralized using the RedCapMD computer platform including a computer-generated randomization table by a consultant statistician. Participating centers will not have access to the randomization table. The participant and the medical team performing the intervention cannot realistically be blinded to the group to which the participant was randomized, but the primary outcome will depend on the impression of the pathologist and physician reviewing the chart who will be blinded to the randomization group. The pathologist will also be blinded to the cryoprobe biopsies when reviewing other biopsies of the same patient (forceps, brush, fine needle and wash) to prevent contamination of his final diagnosis for the other biopsies by the cryoprobe biopsy. The cryoprobe biopsy will be reviewed by a second pathologist or the same pathologist after recording is impression for the other biopsies. At no time before the end of the study can the blinding be lifted for the pathologist or physician reviewing the final diagnosis.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
306

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiekontakt

Navn og kontaktoplysninger for den person, der kan besvare spørgsmål om tilmelding til en klinisk undersøgelse. Hvert sted, hvor undersøgelsen udføres, kan også have en specifik kontaktperson, som kan være bedre i stand til at besvare disse spørgsmål.

Studiesteder

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Rekruttering
        • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Marc Fortin, MD, MSc
  • Grækenland
      • Athens, Grækenland
        • Rekruttering
        • Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Grigoris Stratakos, MD,PhD, FCCP
  • Spanien
    • Principality of Asturias
      • Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spanien
        • Ikke rekrutterer endnu
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Miguel Angel Ariza Prota, MD
  • Tyskland
    • Hesse
      • Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Tyskland, 60487
        • Ikke rekrutterer endnu
        • St. Elisabethen Hospital Frankfurt
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Sammy Onyancha, MD

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and ability to consent
  • Peripheral lung lesion less than 5cm in average diameter on axial CT images (A lung lesion will be considered peripheral if it is located beyond the origin of the subsegmental bronchi and presumed not to be visible endoscopically in white light during the evaluation of the CT scan by an interventional pulmonologist.)
  • Lesion deemed accessible by pEBUS by an experienced interventional pulmonologist
  • Decision by the medical team and the patient to use pEBUS as a diagnostic modality for the lung lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of multiple lung lesions with sampling of more than one lung lesion planned
  • Planned use of electromagnetic navigation, augmented fluoroscopy or robotic bronchoscopy in addition to pEBUS. The use of virtual bronchoscopy planning is permitted
  • Presence of suspicious lymph nodes (size ≥ 10mm and/or moderate or greater hypermetabolism) on imaging which are accessible by l-EBUS and for which rapid on-site cytological analysis will be used
  • Contraindication to bronchoscopy or biopsies such as an unstable medical condition or uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Current pregnancy or lactation
  • Lack of free and informed consent

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: Conscious sedation arm

In the conscious sedation group, the procedure will be performed through the nose or mouth at the discretion of the endoscopist. The patient will remain breathing spontaneously throughout the procedure and will be administered oxygen through a nasal cannula at an initial flow rate of 2L/min. A combination of propofol, fentanyl and midazolam boluses will be used to maintain moderate sedation. At IUCPQ-UL, fentanyl and midazolam will be used as in our routine practice. The boluses will be prescribed by a doctor experienced in conscious sedation (anesthesiologist, intensivist or pulmonologist) according to the patient's state of wakefulness assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) .Centers will decide, prior to initiating recruitment locally, the drug combination used to sedate patients and they will maintain the use of the same drug combination throughout the study.
Procedure: Peripheral EBUS under Concious sedation

In the conscious sedation group, the procedure will be performed through the nose or mouth at the discretion of the endoscopist. The patient will remain breathing spontaneously throughout the procedure and will be administered oxygen through a nasal cannula at an initial flow rate of 2L/min. A combination of propofol, fentanyl and midazolam boluses will be used to maintain moderate sedation. At IUCPQ-UL, fentanyl and midazolam will be used as in our routine practice. The boluses will be prescribed by a doctor experienced in conscious sedation (anesthesiologist, intensivist or pulmonologist) according to the patient's state of wakefulness assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAS) .Centers will decide, prior to initiating recruitment locally, the drug combination used to sedate patients and they will maintain the use of the same drug combination throughout the study
Eksperimentel: General anesthesia arm

In the general anesthesia group, an endotracheal tube larger than 7 will be used. The patient will be kept non-arousable to non-nociceptive stimulation (RASS = -5) by a perfusion including, at the anesthesiologist's discretion: fentanyl, sufentanyl, remifentanyl, midazolam or propofol. The sedation of this group will not be protocolized given the wide variety of practices in the participating centers, but the targeted level of sedation will be and the medication administered will be adjusted according to this target. The RASS will be evaluated every 5 minutes, or earlier if signs of arousal are present, to ensure that the intended target is maintained and adjustments to the rate of infusions as well as boluses may be made/administered by the anesthesiologist to maintain the targeted level of sedation. Patients may be paralyzed at the discretion of the anesthesiologit. The ventilatory parameters will be standardized according to the VESPA protocol
Procedure: Peripheral EBUS under General Anesthesia

In the general anesthesia group, an endotracheal tube larger than 7 will be used. The patient will be kept non-arousable to non-nociceptive stimulation (RAS = -5) by a perfusion including, at the anesthesiologist's discretion: fentanyl, sufentanyl, remifentanyl, midazolam or propofol. The sedation of this group will not be protocolized given the wide variety of practices in the participating centers, but the targeted level of sedation will be and the medication administered will be adjusted according to this target. The RAS will be evaluated every 5 minutes, or earlier if signs of arousal are present, to ensure that the intended target is maintained and adjustments to the rate of infusions as well as boluses may be made/administered by the anesthesiologist to maintain the targeted level of sedation. Patients may be paralyzed at the discretion of the anesthesiologit. The ventilatory parameters will be standardized according to the VESPA protocol

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS under general anesthesia and conscious sedation
Tidsramme: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

The diagnostic yield of pEBUS according to a strict definition, a procedure being defined as diagnostic if it allows a specific benign or malignant diagnosis using the samples obtained. Non-specific findings not allowing a precise diagnosis and accompanied by a follow-up evolution consistent with the findings (e.g.: non-specific inflammation followed by spontaneous resolution of the lesion) will not be considered diagnostic. Cryobiopies will be excluded from the primary outcome analysis as they may not be performed systematically in both groups. We do not primarly aim to evaluate the added value of cryobiopsy but to compare two modalities of sedation.

The comparison between the diagnostic yields for the two types of sedation will be made with a χ2 test, if the distribution of the data is normal
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
Tidsramme: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

The diagnostic yield of pEBUS according to a strict definition with inclusion of cryobiopsy results.

The comparison of the variables will be carried out with a χ2 test
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
Tidsramme: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

The diagnostic yield of pEBUS according to a strict definition, with and without inclusion of cryobiopsy results, amongst lesions under and over 20mm of average diameter.

The comparison of the variables will be carried out with a χ2 test
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
Tidsramme: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

The diagnostic yield of pEBUS according to a liberal definition, a procedure being defined as diagnostic if it allows a specific benign or malignant diagnosis or if it demonstrates non-specific inflammation and that during follow-up a precise benign diagnosis is established or that the lesion regresses on serial imaging. This analysis will be performed with and without inclusion of cryobiopsies.

The comparison of the variables will be carried out with a χ2 test
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Duration of the procedure
Tidsramme: Assessment will begin with the start of the procedure (bronchoscope insertion) and end at procedure completion (bronchoscope removal)

The duration of the procedure from insertion of the bronchoscope to its removal, excluding the time spent on l-EBUS if applicable
Assessment will begin with the start of the procedure (bronchoscope insertion) and end at procedure completion (bronchoscope removal)
Duration of the procedure
Tidsramme: Assessment will begin when the participant enters the procedure room and end when he leaves it. Result will be recorded when the patient leaves the procedure room.

The duration of the procedure from patient's procedure room entry to his departure from the procedure room.
Assessment will begin when the participant enters the procedure room and end when he leaves it. Result will be recorded when the patient leaves the procedure room.
Recovery duration
Tidsramme: Assessment will begin when the participant leaves the procedure room and end when he is discharged from the recovery room. Result will be recorded when the patient is discharged from the recovery room.

The duration of post-procedure recovery before reaching the criteria for discharge (PADS ≥ 9 and adequate oxygen saturation)
Assessment will begin when the participant leaves the procedure room and end when he is discharged from the recovery room. Result will be recorded when the patient is discharged from the recovery room.
Participant Comfort
Tidsramme: Questionnaires will be administered once the patient is ready for discharge from the recovery room

Comfort during the examination according to the patient's answers to two Likert scales of memory of the procedure (absolutely no memory, no specific details, a few details, most of the details, all the details) and willingness to repeat the examination if medically required (definitely not, probably not, uncertain, probably, definitily), and a comfort questionnaire regarding their perception during and after the procedure (dyspnea, cough, pain, anxiety, nausea, general discomfort)
Questionnaires will be administered once the patient is ready for discharge from the recovery room
Adverse event rates
Tidsramme: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

The rate of adverse events and serious adverse events of pEBUS under general anesthesia versus conscious sedation
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
25. september 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
1. august 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
1. august 2029

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
14. februar 2025

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
25. april 2025

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
30. april 2025

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
9. november 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
4. november 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. november 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • 2025-4122

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger