Effects of AI Dialogue-Based Scenario Simulation on Students' Flow and Learning Performance
The Effects of Scenario Simulation Via AI Dialogue Integrated With Concept Mapping and Gamified Feedback on Students' Flow and Learning Performance: The Roles of Collaborative Processes and Interaction Mechanisms
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Bao Huan Yang, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +88632118999 ext 3401
- E-mail: bhyang@mail.cgust.edu.tw
Studiesteder
-
-
Taoyuan City
-
Taoyuan, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 333324
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the designated nursing course during the study period.
Aged 18 years or older. Willing to participate and providing informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Students who decline or do not provide informed consent.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Andet
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Gamified Feedback Group
Participants receive a concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by gamified feedback.
The feedback includes gamification elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.
|
Gamified feedback is delivered following the AI dialogue-based scenario simulation and includes game-related elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Conventional Formative Feedback Group
Participants receive the same concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by conventional formative feedback without gamification elements.
|
Conventional formative feedback is delivered following the same AI dialogue-based scenario simulation without gamification elements.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Flow Experience
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the intervention
|
Flow experience will be assessed using the 8-item Flow Experience Questionnaire developed by Pearce et al. (2005).
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate a greater level of flow experience.
Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the distribution and change in flow scores, missing data, and internal consistency.
|
Baseline and immediately after completion of the intervention
|
|
Academic Learning Performance
Tidsramme: At the midterm and final examinations during the academic semester
|
Academic learning performance will be assessed using students' course midterm and final examination scores.
Higher scores indicate better academic performance.
|
At the midterm and final examinations during the academic semester
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Intrinsic Motivation
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the intervention
|
Intrinsic motivation will be assessed using a 25-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), based on the IMI framework of McAuley et al. (1989) and the version adapted by Yin et al. (2021).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
The instrument assesses five dimensions: interest/enjoyment, pressure/tension, perceived choice, perceived competence, and perceived value.
Reverse-coded items will be recoded before analysis, and each subscale score will be calculated as the mean of its constituent items.
|
Baseline and immediately after completion of the intervention
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Anslået)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- IRB-26-058-B1
- NSTC 115-2410-H-255-014 (Andet bevillings-/finansieringsnummer: National Science and Technology Council)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .