Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Block And Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block in Hip Surgery (PENG block)

9. november 2026 opdateret af: Ain Shams University

Hip fracture is a common orthopedic emergency in the elderly, and it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical reduction and fixation are the definitive treatment in most patients, effective perioperative analgesia that minimizes the need for opioids and related adverse effects (such as delirium) is essential in this patient population.

In this study we are going to compare the effects of ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on postoperative analgesia and quadriceps strength following total hip arthroplasty.

Studieoversigt

Status

Rekruttering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Total hip replacements (THRs) are quite successful surgery for many end-stage hip diseases in terms of pain relief and functional recovery (Lindberg-larsen M et al,2020). However, THR are associated with severe perioperative pain which prolongs length of hospitalization and increases the morbidity and medical cost (Guarino AJ et al,2019). Adequate pain management is crucial for improving the satisfaction of patients and clinical outcomes. Numerous strategies have been implemented to reduce postoperative pain following THR including local infiltration analgesia, epidural analgesia, intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and peripheral nerve block. (Kuchalik J et al,2017).

So, multimodal analgesia has been extensively used in perioperative period of THR (Berninger MT etal, 2019).

One of the regional anesthesia options for hip surgery is the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) that affects nerves important for hip innervation and sensory innervation of the thigh - femoral, obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.(Standring S,2015). FICB can be easily performed and is often a good solution for management of hip fractures in emergency departments. Its use reduces morphine pre-operative requirement for patients with femoral neck fractures and can also be indicated for hip arthroplasty, hip arthroscopy and burn management of the region (Madabushi R, 2016). A suprainguinal FICB produces a more complete sensory block of the medial, anterior and lateral region of the thigh when compared to infra-inguinal FICB. Additionally,supra-inguinal FICB leads to a more consistent spread in the cranial direction, thus spreading the anesthetic more consistently towards the lumbar plexus and three targeted nerves. So,the supra-inguinal approach has a superior postoperative analgesic efficacy compared to infra-inguinal approach along with significantly less morphine consumption in the first 24(Garner M,2017).

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, which targets sensory branches of the obturator, accessory obturator, and femoral nerves in the anterior capsule of the hip, has been proposed as an effective method to treat pain associated with hip fractures and total hip arthroplasty(THA)(Giron-Arango L,2018). The PENG block provides coverage of the sensory nerves supplying the anterior hip while sparing motor blockade of the quadriceps; a known complication of fascia iliaca and femoral blocks (Tran J,2019).

PENG block has potential advantages over traditional forms of regional analgesia for pain originating from the hip, such as femoral nerve or fascia iliaca blocks. One of these potential advantages include a wider and more complete coverage of sensory nerves innervating the hip, leading to more effective regional analgesia with the potential to reduce postoperative pain,increase patient satisfaction and allow early mobilization(Bartels K,2016).

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

64

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypten, 11211

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for hip surgeries.
  • Age: patients aged ≥ 18 years old from both sexes.
  • Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Refusal of procedure or participation in the study.
  • Patients suffering from allergy to local anestheics.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders or those on anticoagulant medication.
  • Infection in punctured site.
  • Classified as either American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class IV-V
  • Patients suffering from cardiac condition,dementia or cognitive impairment, liver failure, renal insufficiency and pre-existing neurologic deficits.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: group P

patients receiving Peng block.

patients receiving Peng block.

Eksperimentel: Group F

patients receiving suprainguinal Fascia iliaca block.

patients receiving suprainguinal Fascia iliaca block

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
pain score(VAS score)
Tidsramme: 24 hour

The primary outcome measure was pain scores(VAS score) from 0(no pain) till 10 severe pain

24 hour

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. januar 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. december 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. december 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

4. november 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

9. november 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

12. november 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

12. november 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

9. november 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • Hip Surgery Block

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .