Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Post ICU Follow up: A Questionnaire Survey of Aftercare in Denmark

8. november 2017 opdateret af: Zealand University Hospital

Follow-up After Intensive Care Treatment: a Questionnaire Survey of Intensive Care Aftercare in Denmark.

This study aims to investigate current aftercare activities in Denmark after intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The hypothesis is that a large number of hospitals offer aftercare, and these interventions are heterogenic and differ between hospitals and regions.

This study is an electronic questionnaire survey that aim to describe and map Danish aftercare activities, and future development plans in this field.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Annually, more than 30,000 patients are admitted for treatment at Danish intensive care units (ICUs). These critically ill patients are some of the most vulnerable in the health care system.

For years, focus has primarily been on treatment and survival of this patient group. As treatment effectiveness has gradually increased, the overall survival rate is now above 80%. Consequently, the period following ICU discharge has gained increasing focus and follow up interventions in the period after ICU treatment have become more common. These different follow up interventions has given name to the concept of 'aftercare'. Aftercare activities includes both early rehabilitation initiated during the continued hospital admission and also the following rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Complications after intensive care treatment are numerous, including both physical, cognitive and psychological impairments, e.g. depression, muscle weakness, anxiety and social isolation. Together these symptoms are defined as post intensive care syndrome (PICS).

While it is clear that a need for aftercare exists, the optimal evidence based activities remains to be determined. The current follow-up activities are established as local initiatives and the methods vary greatly. Examples of present aftercare interventions include use of diaries, follow-up consultations, revisiting the ICU and assessment of quality of life.

A recent systematic review examined these different rehabilitation efforts, without finding significant effects of the present interventions, although usage of ICU-diaries had a minor preventive effect on post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). A Danish meta-analysis from 2015 on follow-up consultations showed similar results.

Aftercare is a rapidly developing area and it is necessary to further investigate this important topic. Therefore, the investigators want to describe the current level of aftercare with a new mapping of activities in all Danish ICUs. Hereby, the investigators hope to create a better and up-to-date foundation for further development within Danish aftercare. Furthermore, the investigators wish to research on the clinician-experienced (the participants) attitude towards and limitations for aftercare activities, in order to discuss directions for future development.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

31

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Køge, Danmark, 4600
        • Zealand University Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

All Intensive Care Units in Denmark treating adult patients.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All Intensive Care Units in Denmark treating adult patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

Intensive care units with a specialty field within these four groups:

  • Neurology and neurosurgery
  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • Pediatrics or neonatology (PICU/NICU)
  • Postoperative care units

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incidence of ICUs offering early aftercare to patients after discharge from ICU
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Incidence of ICUs offering late aftercare to patients after discharge from hospital
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
From May 15th to September 31st 2016

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Size of hospital (number of beds)
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Size of ICU (number of beds)
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Time from ICU-discharge to first contact
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many hours to days until the patient is contacted at the general wards
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Time from hospital discharge to first contact
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many months from discharge, until the patient is contacted
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Aftercare team members
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Consumption of time
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Aftercare team members
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Consumption of time
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions during general ward stay
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions after hospital discharge
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Contact method
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How the ICU contacts the patient after hospital discharge. By phone, by letter, by mail, by digital inbox
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Participation of family members
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list: Whether the family is invited to participate in the consultation with the patient or not. Yes/No
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Classifications of reasons for not having an aftercare programme at ICUs without an aftercare programme
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: Not enough money, resistance from the general wards, not an important subject, and also be able to write their own answer.
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The responsible party for the financing of aftercare
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The ICU itself, the general ward, the region or through funds?
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent's own assessment of how aftercare will be prioritized at their ICU in one year.
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose on a scale: More aftercare? Same level of aftercare? Less aftercare?
From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Should aftercare be offered?
Tidsramme: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose on a scale: Totally agree, partially agree, neither agree or disagree, partially disagree, totally disagree
From May 15th to September 31st 2016

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Cilia KW Kjer, Bach.med, Køge Hospital

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. maj 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. august 2016

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. januar 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. april 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. maj 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

27. maj 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

9. november 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

8. november 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. november 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • CK1-Survey

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Kritisk sygdom

3
Abonner