Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Using Reverse Flow Based Flap VS Palatal Pedicled Flap for Closure of Recurrent Small & Medium Sized Oronasal Fistula.

20. november 2021 opdateret af: Doaa Jawad Roomi

Patient Satisfaction After Using Reverse Flow Based Facial Artery Musculomucosal Flap (FAMM) Versus Palatal Pedicled Flap for Closure of Recurrent Small and Medium Sized Oronasal Fistula. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Research question:

What are the outcomes of using the Facial artery Musculomucosal (FAMM) Flap to close recurrent small and medium sized oronasal fistulae based on reverse flow on patient's satisfaction versus using the Palatal Pedicled flap?

Statement of the problem:

To determine whether the using the Facial artery Musculomucosal (FAMM) Flap to close recurrent small and medium sized oronasal fistulae which are difficult to manage could meet the patients satisfaction regarding both success and function versus using palatal pedicled flap

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Oronasal fistulae (particularly those of the anterior palate) are often difficult to close because the buccal cavity is narrow and the palatal mucosa is not extensible.

Historically, skin flaps (forehead or nasolabial skin flaps) were first used to close such defects. but they leave a conspicuous scar. Mucosal flaps, which were empirically harvested from the cheek mucosa have also been used occasionally, but unpredictable results discouraged further attempts. A more accurate description of the vascularization of the buccal mucosal has allowed the design of axial-pattern flaps. The buccinator musculomucosal flap was first introduced as an island flap supported by the facial pedicle, and was then used successfully as an axial pattern flap that was vascularized by the buccal artery according to Bozola et al. or the facial artery according to Carstens et al.

The FAMM (facial artery musculomucosal) flap was introduced by Pribaz et al. in 1992 and its main advantage is its long rotational arc that allows closure of defects of the anterior palate that were formerly a reconstructive challenge. Pribaz et al. gave an accurate description of the dissection of the flap, but variations in the course of the facial artery sometimes preclude its use. Previous studies involving FAMM flap were applied to oronasal fistula repair either recurrent or as first attempt were described in repair of alveolar clefts, anterior palatal fistulae and in recurrent fistulae after palatoplasty in cleft patients either superior or inferior pediceled flap. In cases of hypovascular bed, it increases the chances for failure of other techniques of closure. The palatal pedilced flap was reported in the literature as one of the regional flaps for closure of oronasal fistulae. The previous studies included case series, with no any randomized clinical trial.

This study compares using FAMM flap versus Palatal Pedicled flap in a randomized clinical trial in closure of recurrent oronasal fistulae.

Aim of the study To evaluate the effect of using FAMM for closure of recurrent small and medium sized oronasal fistula on patient's satisfaction versus using the palatal pedicled flap.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

20

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Cairo, Egypten, 11553
        • Faculty of dentistry

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 60 år (Voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with recurrent small and medium sized oronasal fistula failed after several attempts closure, up to 10 mm regardless of number of recurrence and position of the fistula.
  • Age group : from 18 to 60 years old.
  • No sex predilection.
  • Patients with no contraindications to surgical intervention.
  • Patients accepting consent for extracting one teeth in the surgical field if needed.
  • Patients proved with Doppler study with a patent facial artery course.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic condition counteracting with the surgical procedure.
  • Patients who underwent a previously ipsilateral cheek flap except for midline fistulae.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Study group
Surgical closure of patients with recurrent small to medium sized oronasal fistulae using FAMM and assessment of success regarding patient satisfaction and healing and absence of complications such as venous congestion, dehiscence, facial nerve injury and infection.
  • Flap will be marked medial to the duct, which limits posterior extent of flap. Anterior flap marking starts 1cm posterior to oral commissure.
  • Width of flap was kept to about 2-2.5cm.
  • An initial incision will be made 1cm posterior to oral commissure.
  • Incision will be deepened through buccal mucosa, submucosa, & underlying muscles into layer of buccal fat.
  • Flap will be dissected in a retrograde or antegrade manner depending on fistula site, maintaining vessels in a central position in the flap.
  • Once completely raised, flap inserted & sutured in place while donor site be closed primarily with 4-0 polyglactin (Vicryl) interrupted sutures.
  • Patient's comparator group will be treated by raising a palatal pedicled flap.
  • Flap will be outlined extending from palatal mucosa against permanent 2nd molar till permanent canine anteriorly.
  • It is rotated towards oronasal fistula & secured in place using 4 -0 Vicryl interrupted sutures.
Aktiv komparator: Comparator group
Surgical closure of patients with recurrent small to medium sized oronasal fistulae and its effect on patient's satisfaction and healing and absence of complications such as venous congestion, dehiscence, facial nerve injury and infection
  • Flap will be marked medial to the duct, which limits posterior extent of flap. Anterior flap marking starts 1cm posterior to oral commissure.
  • Width of flap was kept to about 2-2.5cm.
  • An initial incision will be made 1cm posterior to oral commissure.
  • Incision will be deepened through buccal mucosa, submucosa, & underlying muscles into layer of buccal fat.
  • Flap will be dissected in a retrograde or antegrade manner depending on fistula site, maintaining vessels in a central position in the flap.
  • Once completely raised, flap inserted & sutured in place while donor site be closed primarily with 4-0 polyglactin (Vicryl) interrupted sutures.
  • Patient's comparator group will be treated by raising a palatal pedicled flap.
  • Flap will be outlined extending from palatal mucosa against permanent 2nd molar till permanent canine anteriorly.
  • It is rotated towards oronasal fistula & secured in place using 4 -0 Vicryl interrupted sutures.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
questionnaire
Tidsramme: 3 months
Meet the patients satisfaction regarding both success and function after closure of recurrent small and medium sized oronasal fistula using the Facial artery Musculomucosal (FAMM) Flap
3 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

3. december 2020

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

3. marts 2021

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

3. marts 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

11. marts 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

22. marts 2021

Først opslået (Faktiske)

24. marts 2021

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

23. november 2021

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

20. november 2021

Sidst verificeret

1. november 2021

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • OMFS 3-3-8

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Patienttilfredshed

Abonner