Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Print Lung Screening Communication Outcomes

18. oktober 2021 opdateret af: Katie Robb, University of Glasgow

The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Knowledge and Acceptability for Lung Screening Print Decision Support Materials

The purpose of this study is to test whether a picture narrative format is more successful, than text with pictures or text alone, in communicating lung screening information (primarily defined by positive attitudes towards the design and increase in knowledge) to people likely to be invited to lung screening where available.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Population screening is key to detecting lung cancer early at a more treatable stage. Uptake of screening should be equitable (i.e., screening benefits all eligible members of the population and does not contribute further to health disparities) and informed (i.e., participants have been involved in the decision to take part and their decision aligns with their values and circumstances). Print decision support materials are the primary mechanism for encouraging engagement with cancer screening and supporting decision making. It is essential that we identify print communication techniques that are effective in informing invitees about lung screening.

The intervention, picture narrative information about lung screening, was previously developed through codesign and prototype testing with people likely to be eligible for lung screening (50 to 75 years old, past or current heavy smokers). Participants will be randomised to one of three groups: Picture narrative format, Text with pictures (control 1) or, Text-only (control 2). This study will assess whether presenting lung screening information in a picture narrative format can improve lung cancer screening knowledge, eligibility self-assessment and attitudes. It will also assess whether perceptions of the information designs can explain any impact of the intervention on these outcomes and whether there are differences across socioeconomic groups.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

326

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Det Forenede Kongerige
      • Glasgow, Det Forenede Kongerige, G12 0XH
        • Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

49 år til 75 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living in Glasgow
  • Willing and able to respond unaided to invitation to participate in the trial and give informed consent.
  • Aged between 49 and 75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Picture narrative lung screening information
Participants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format which uses text in combination with sequences of pictures to communicate a coherent message. The designs follow conventions from comics/graphic narratives and key stakeholders were involved during the design process.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Picture narrative information format
Lung screening information formatted as picture narratives
Aktiv komparator: Text with pictures lung screening information
Participants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format that uses text with non-narrative pictures for decoration. The pictures have been extracted from the picture narratives being used Arm 1.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Text with pictures information format
Lung screening information formatted as text and non-narrative pictures
Aktiv komparator: Text-only lung screening information
Participants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format that uses text and no pictures.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Text-only information format
Lung screening information formatted as text with no pictures

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge scores
Tidsramme: Immediately post-intervention
Participants will be asked 6 multiple choice questions related to the lung screening information presented to the participants during the intervention, covering; Procedure, Eligibility - who, Eligibility - why, Benefits, Adverse effects, Potential results.
Immediately post-intervention
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility self-assessment
Tidsramme: Immediately post-intervention
Concordance between self-reported personal eligibility for lung cancer screening and actual eligibility based on self-reported age and smoking behaviour.
Immediately post-intervention
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Attitudes
Tidsramme: Immediately post-intervention
Self-administered four-item lung cancer screening attitudes measure covering cancer fear, fatalism, benefits, and worry, previously used by Smits et al 2018.
Immediately post-intervention

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Participant Design appraisal ratings
Tidsramme: Immediately post-intervention

Self-administered nine-item measure rating perceptions of appeal, enjoyment, interest, ease of use, trustworthiness, appropriateness, helpfulness, informativity.

Alongside a single item asking participants whether enough information was provided.
Immediately post-intervention

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Treatment compliance
Tidsramme: Immediately post-intervention
Self-reported length of time spent reading the lung screening information.
Immediately post-intervention

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

University of Glasgow

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Kathryn Robb, PhD, University of Glasgow

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

27. august 2021

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

8. oktober 2021

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

8. oktober 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

17. august 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

17. august 2021

Først opslået (Faktiske)

23. august 2021

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

26. oktober 2021

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

18. oktober 2021

Sidst verificeret

1. oktober 2021

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 200200021

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Anonymised individual level study data will be shared via the University of Glasgow's repository Enlighten: Research Data.

IPD-delingstidsramme

On publication of the study results for a period of ten years.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

Data will be made publicly available.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Kræftscreening

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Madagascar

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner