Forudsig det bedste niveau af plejeplacering for hvert barns adfærdsmæssige sundhedsbehov - Effektivitetsundersøgelse

I PSP-anbefalet placering

Kunder i placering med PSP -resultater inden for en standardafvigelse af den højest forudsagte sandsynlighed for succes for denne klient ved opfølgning

Andet: Clinical Team Access to Placement Success Predictor (PSP) resultater

PSP er et maskinlæringsbaseret klinisk beslutningsstøtteværktøj, der er designet til at hjælpe kliniske teammedlemmer med at tage placeringsbeslutninger for unge. PSP leverer stedspecifik placering af succesresultater for placering af placering [dvs. klientens sandsynlighed for succes pr. Placering baseret på maskinlæringsmodeller] for hver ungdom.

Not In PSP-Recommended Placement

Clients not in placement with PSP results within one standard deviation of the highest predicted likelihood of success for that client at follow up

Andet: Clinical Team Access to Placement Success Predictor (PSP) resultater

PSP er et maskinlæringsbaseret klinisk beslutningsstøtteværktøj, der er designet til at hjælpe kliniske teammedlemmer med at tage placeringsbeslutninger for unge. PSP leverer stedspecifik placering af succesresultater for placering af placering [dvs. klientens sandsynlighed for succes pr. Placering baseret på maskinlæringsmodeller] for hver ungdom.

Mean Difference in Average Domain Z-scores Across Raters Within Two Weeks on the Clinical Scale of the Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) Between a) Baseline and b) Follow-up

The Child Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) is a 48-item scale for children (ages 3 - 18) that assesses 13 domains. The Adolescent TOP-CS is a 58-item scale for adolescents (ages 11 - 21) that assesses 12 domains. TOP-CS assesses the client's past 2-week experience on domains including Depression, Violence, and Suicidality (scores are risk-adjusted for case mix variables assessed via 37 items on the companion TOP-Case Mix form regarding stressful life events, comorbidity). Participants answer "All" to "None of the Time" for each item on a 6-point Likert scale.

A domain z-score of 0 represents the general population mean. Domain z-scores are averaged into a summary score per participant. Higher (more positive) average z-scores indicate greater symptom severity and lower behavioral well-being (a worse outcome). The value reported is the mean difference in this average z-score between baseline and follow-up; a negative mean difference indicates improvement (reduced severity).

Mean Difference Between the Average Risk-adjusted Predicted TOP-CS Total Score Across Raters at Study Baseline and the Actual Average TOP-CS Total Score Across Raters at Follow-up

The Child Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) is a 48-item scale for children (ages 3 - 18) that assesses 13 domains. The Adolescent TOP-CS is a 58-item scale for adolescents (ages 11 - 21) that assesses 12 behavioral health domains. Participants answer "All" to "None of the Time" for each item on a 6-point Likert scale.

The TOP-CS Total Score is computed by averaging item responses. The range is 48 to 288 for the Child TOP-CS and 56 to 336 for the Adolescent TOP-CS. Higher Total Scores represent better behavioral well-being (a better outcome). Total Scores are averaged across raters per participant. The value reported is the mean difference between each participant's model-predicted, risk-adjusted Total Score (the outcome expected given their baseline profile) and their actual observed Total Score at follow-up. A positive mean difference indicates that the actual follow-up outcome exceeded the model-predicted outcome (i.e., the participant did better than predicted).