Predict the Best Level of Care Placement for Each Child's Behavioral Health Needs - Effectiveness Study

February 13, 2025 updated by: Outcome Referrals, Inc.

Placement Success Predictor: Using Site-Customized Machine Learning Models to Predict the Best Level of Care Placement for Each Child's Behavioral Health Needs

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a new clinical decision support tool, Placement Success Predictor (PSP), in a naturalistic setting. PSP will provide placement-specific predictions about the likelihood of a youth having a good outcome in each placement type at a behavioral health center using machine learning algorithms.

The primary hypothesis is that clients in at least one placement within one standard deviation of the placement with the highest predicted likelihood of success will have better outcomes than the clients who were not.

The secondary hypothesis is that clients' level of improvement over time will be positively correlated with the number of days they are in at least one placement within one standard deviation of the placement with the highest predicted likelihood of success.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In 2017, a total of 669,799 children were confirmed victims of maltreatment in the United States; of the 442,733 children in foster care, 34% have been in more than one placement and 11% are in a group home or institution. Stakes are extremely high for making the best out-of-home placement choice per child because some placement types and multiple placements are associated with poor outcomes. In the past few years, legislation has been created to guide placement decisions for children. Federal law 42 U.S. Code 675 requires that children in the care of the state are placed "in a safe setting that is the least restrictive (most family like)." In addition, the Family First Prevention Services Act signed into law by the U.S. Congress in 2018 includes measures to reduce the number of children in long-term residential settings. This effectiveness study is to assess and improve the usage of PSP in a behavioral health setting.

Sample. Clients at Children's Hope Alliance (CHA) who completed the TOP, CHA's standard behavioral health assessment. The target recruitment goal is 700 clients.

Methods. PSP results will be available for all clients with recent behavioral health assessment data.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Framingham, Massachusetts, United States, 01701
        • Outcome Referrals, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clients at Children's Hope Alliance

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completed TOP CS assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
In PSP-Recommended Placement
Clients in placement with PSP results within one standard deviation of the highest predicted likelihood of success for that client at follow up
PSP is a machine-learning based clinical decision support tool that is designed to assist clinical team members in making placement decisions for youth. PSP provides site-specific placement success prediction scores [i.e., client's likelihood of success per placement based on machine learning models] for each youth.
Not In PSP-Recommended Placement
Clients not in placement with PSP result within one standard deviation of the highest predicted likelihood of success for that client at follow up
PSP is a machine-learning based clinical decision support tool that is designed to assist clinical team members in making placement decisions for youth. PSP provides site-specific placement success prediction scores [i.e., client's likelihood of success per placement based on machine learning models] for each youth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference on average z-scores across raters within two weeks on the Clinical Scale of the Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) between a) the beginning of the study (between February and October 2025) and b) approximately 3 months later.
Time Frame: At baseline and every 30 days up to approximately 3 months
TOP is a comprehensive well-being assessment that is used in behavioral health and child welfare settings. The Child TOP Clinical Scale (TOP-CS) is a 58-item scale for children (ages 3 - 18) that assesses 13 domains. The Adolescent TOP Clinical Scale (TOP-CS) is a 48-item scale for adolescents (ages 11 - 21) that assesses 12 domains. TOP-CS assesses the client's past 2-week experience on domains including Depression, Violence, and Suicidality (scores are risk-adjusted for case mix variables assessed via 37 items on the companion TOP-Case Mix form regarding stressful life events, comorbidity). Participants answer "All" to "None of the Time" for each item on a 6-point Likert scale. The z-scores (standard deviation units relative to the general population mean for each domain) will be averaged together to create one summary score. Higher scores suggest higher severity/lower behavioral well-being.
At baseline and every 30 days up to approximately 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2R44MH125486-02A1-Aim 2B
  • 2R44MH125486-02A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness

Clinical Trials on Clinical team access to Placement Success Predictor (PSP) results

Subscribe