Pilot Study of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Pilot Study - Randomized Controlled Trial of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients scheduled for telephone-based visits who are doing so because of a lack of ability to conduct a video visit (i.e. no tablet/laptop; no access to internet) who live in Baltimore City
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with significant visual or hearing impairment
- Patients that have legal guardians or who are marked as lacking healthcare decision-making capacity
- Patients that have not selected English as their preferred language
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Telemedicine - Phone
Patients will continue with their telephone-based telemedicine visit as scheduled.
There will be no change to their care.
Patients will receive a survey by mail about the visit.
|
|
|
Experimental: Telemedicine - Audio/Video
Patients will be given an internet-connected tablet to have their upcoming visit with their physician by audio/video.
A survey can be completed on the tablet.
The devices will be sent back to the research time after their single use.
|
An internet-connected tablet provided to patient for upcoming visit with physician by audio/video which can also be used to complete a survey.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider rating as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider rating will be assessed with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating of 0-10; 0 being worst provider possible and 10 being best provider possible.
|
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. Satisfaction (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
Overall score 3 to 15 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree].
Overall score 2 to 10 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to efficacy. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. b. I was able to understand the patient's explanation of their medical problems well enough. c. In general, this telemedicine visit was effective in improving this patient's medical care d. An in-person visit would likely have provided additional clinically-relevant information e. An in-person visit would likely have led to a change in management |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider communication as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
The ability of a provider to communicate will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to communication. Did this provider explain things in a way that was easy to understand? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider listening as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider listening will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to listening. Did this provider listen carefully to you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider respect as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider respect will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to respect. Did this provider show respect for what you had to say? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider time spent as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider time spent will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to time spent during the clinical encounter. Did this provider spend enough time with you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Patient health rating as assessed by a likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Patient health will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to patient health. In general, how would you rate your overall health?
In general, how would you rate your overall mental or emotional health?
Overall score 2 to 10 with lower scores signifying better health. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Jeremy A Epstein, MD, Johns Hopkins University
- Hauptermittler: Casey Overby Taylor, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- IRB00257994
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- SAFT
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .