Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragmatic Structure and Function in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Point-of-Care Tool for Predicting Complications and Sarcopenia in Limited Resource Settings
The goal of this observational study is to learn how liver cirrhosis affects the diaphragm, the main muscle used for breathing, in adults. The study will measure diaphragmatic thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion using bedside ultrasound and compare these values between patients with cirrhosis and healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do patients with cirrhosis show reduced diaphragmatic function compared to healthy adults?
Does removal of ascitic fluid by paracentesis improve diaphragmatic mechanics?
Can ultrasound measurements of the diaphragm serve as a reliable non-invasive marker of sarcopenia when compared to CT scans?
Participants will:
Undergo diaphragmatic ultrasound during quiet and deep breathing
Provide clinical and laboratory data related to liver disease severity
In some cases, have ultrasound repeated before and after paracentesis
For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, CT scans will be analyzed to measure muscle mass
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Nada Refaat Mohamed, MD
- Telefonnummer: +201019860918
- E-Mail: nadarefaat411@gmail.com
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Mohamed Abdelghany Abdelhamed
- Telefonnummer: +201112828724
- E-Mail: Moh7111@aun.edu.eg
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Adults (≥18 years of age) with confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis attending the hepatology outpatient clinic or admitted to the hepatology inpatient unit of the study institution.
Study Subgroups The total study sample will consist of 120 participants, including 95 patients with liver cirrhosis and 25 healthy controls. The cirrhotic cohort will include patients across different Child-Pugh classes and MELD scores and will encompass clinically relevant subgroups such as patients with ascites undergoing paracentesis, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
- Subgroup A: Ascites/Paracentesis (n=30): Patients with tense or refractory ascites for whom large-volume paracentesis is clinically indicated. This subgroup will contribute both cross-sectional and longitudinal (pre/post paracentesis) data.
- Subgroup B: Hepatic Hydrothorax (n=40): Twenty patients with confirmed hepatic hydrothorax (HH; defined as pleural effusion >500 mL in the absence of primary cardiopulm
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis based on clinical, biochemical, histological, or imaging criteria.
- Ability to provide written informed consent in Arabic or English.
- For Subgroup A: clinical indication for large-volume paracentesis with an ascitic volume of ≥5 liters.
- For Subgroup B: confirmed hepatic hydrothorax or confirmed absence of pleural effusion on ultrasound or chest X-ray.
- For Subgroup C: radiologically confirmed HCC by triphasic CT or MRI according to EASL/AASLD diagnostic criteria, with available CT imaging for L3 SMI analysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant pre-existing primary pulmonary disease (e.g., moderate-to-severe COPD defined as FEV1/FVC <70% with FEV1 <60% predicted, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis) that independently affects diaphragmatic mechanics.
- Recent thoracic surgery, thoracocentesis within the preceding 72 hours, or thoracic trauma.
- Neuromuscular disease (e.g., myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome) independently affecting diaphragmatic function.
- Active mechanical ventilation at time of enrollment.
- Pregnancy.
- Inability to achieve adequate ultrasound acoustic windows (e.g., due to extreme obesity or surgical dressings).
- Contraindications to paracentesis in Subgroup A (e.g., disseminated intravascular coagulation, bowel obstruction).
- Prior or planned liver transplantation within the study period, which would confound longitudinal follow-up.
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Anzahl der Gruppen / Kohorten
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / KohorteGruppe / Kohorte |
|---|
|
Adults with Liver Cirrhosis
This cohort includes adults diagnosed with liver cirrhosis, with subgroups defined by complications such as ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
A subgroup undergoing paracentesis will be assessed before and after fluid removal to evaluate acute changes in diaphragmatic function.
In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, CT scans will be analyzed to calculate skeletal muscle index for correlation with ultrasound findings.
A small number of healthy volunteers will also undergo diaphragmatic ultrasound to establish normative reference values; however, they are not considered a separate cohort for analysis.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Diaphragmatic Thickness (Tdi-exp, Tdi-insp) [cm]
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Diaphragmatic thickness at end-expiration (Tdi-exp) and end-inspiration (Tdi-insp) measured by B-mode ultrasound.
|
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Diaphragmatic Thickening Fraction (TF) [%]
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Thickening fraction calculated as [(Tdi-insp - Tdi-exp) / Tdi-exp] × 100, measured by B-mode ultrasound.
|
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Diaphragmatic Excursion (DE) [cm]
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Amplitude of diaphragmatic displacement measured by M-mode ultrasound during quiet breathing.
|
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Group Differences in Diaphragmatic Thickness Across Cirrhosis Stages
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment)
|
Mean differences in diaphragmatic thickness (cm) between patients with Child-Pugh A, B, and C cirrhosis, and across MELD score strata. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment)
|
|
Group Differences in Diaphragmatic Thickening Fraction Across Cirrhosis Stages
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Mean differences in diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) between patients with Child-Pugh A, B, and C cirrhosis, and across MELD score strata. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (%). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Group Differences in Diaphragmatic Excursion Across Cirrhosis Stages
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Mean differences in diaphragmatic excursion (cm) between patients with Child-Pugh A, B, and C cirrhosis, and across MELD score strata. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Thickness with Disease Severity
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic thickness (cm) and liver disease severity scores (Child-Pugh class, MELD score). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Thickening Fraction (TF) with Disease Severity
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) and liver disease severity scores (Child-Pugh class, MELD score). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Excursion (DE) with Disease Severity
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic excursion (cm) and liver disease severity scores (Child-Pugh class, MELD score). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic ultrasound parameters and skeletal muscle index (CT scans)
Zeitfenster: At baseline (single measurement)
|
In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, triphasic CT scans will be analyzed to calculate skeletal muscle index.
These values will be correlated with diaphragmatic ultrasound parameters to assess the utility of ultrasound as a surrogate marker of sarcopenia.
|
At baseline (single measurement)
|
|
Change in Diaphragmatic Thickness After Paracentesis
Zeitfenster: Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
Change in diaphragmatic thickness (cm) measured by B-mode ultrasound before and within 60 ± 15 minutes after large-volume paracentesis. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
|
Change in Diaphragmatic Thickening Fraction After Paracentesis
Zeitfenster: Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
Change in diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) measured by B-mode ultrasound before and within 60 ± 15 minutes after large-volume paracentesis. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (%). |
Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
|
Change in Diaphragmatic Excursion After Paracentesis
Zeitfenster: Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
Change in diaphragmatic excursion (cm) measured by M-mode ultrasound before and within 60 ± 15 minutes after large-volume paracentesis. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Pre-paracentesis (Day 1, immediately before procedure) and within 60 minutes post-paracentesis.
|
|
Diaphragmatic Thickness in Patients With vs. Without Hepatic Hydrothorax
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Comparison of mean diaphragmatic thickness (cm) between cirrhotic patients with hepatic hydrothorax and matched cirrhotic controls without hydrothorax. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Diaphragmatic Thickening Fraction in Patients With vs. Without Hepatic Hydrothorax
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Comparison of mean diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) between cirrhotic patients with hepatic hydrothorax and matched cirrhotic controls without hydrothorax. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (%). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Diaphragmatic Excursion in Patients With vs. Without Hepatic Hydrothorax
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Comparison of mean diaphragmatic excursion (cm) between cirrhotic patients with hepatic hydrothorax and matched cirrhotic controls without hydrothorax. Unit of Measure: Mean difference (cm). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with Dyspnea Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction (defined by ultrasound parameters) and dyspnea severity measured by the mMRC scale (0-4). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with Respiratory Rate
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction and respiratory rate (breaths/min). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with Oxygen Saturation
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂, %). Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r). |
Baseline (Day 1, at enrollment).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with Length of Hospital Stay
Zeitfenster: During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction (defined by ultrasound parameters: thickness, thickening fraction, excursion) and length of hospital stay (days).
Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r).
|
During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with ICU Admission
Zeitfenster: During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction and need for ICU admission.
Unit of Measure: Odds ratio (% of patients requiring ICU admission).
|
During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
|
Correlation of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction with In-Hospital Complications
Zeitfenster: During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
Correlation between diaphragmatic dysfunction and occurrence of complications (e.g., respiratory failure, infection).
Unit of Measure: Incidence (% of patients with complications).
|
During hospitalization (up to 30 days).
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Ahmed Helmy Salem, professor, Assiut University
- Hauptermittler: Maiada Kamal Eldeen Hashem, Assiut University
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P. Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values. Chest. 2009 Feb;135(2):391-400. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1541. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
- D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006 Jan;44(1):217-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013. Epub 2005 Nov 9. No abstract available.
- GBD 2017 Cirrhosis Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;5(3):245-266. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30349-8. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
- Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
- Carey EJ, Lai JC, Sonnenday C, Tapper EB, Tandon P, Duarte-Rojo A, Dunn MA, Tsien C, Kallwitz ER, Ng V, Dasarathy S, Kappus M, Bashir MR, Montano-Loza AJ. A North American Expert Opinion Statement on Sarcopenia in Liver Transplantation. Hepatology. 2019 Nov;70(5):1816-1829. doi: 10.1002/hep.30828. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
- Haaksma ME, Smit JM, Boussuges A, Demoule A, Dres M, Ferrari G, Formenti P, Goligher EC, Heunks L, Lim EHT, Mokkink LB, Soilemezi E, Shi Z, Umbrello M, Vetrugno L, Vivier E, Xu L, Zambon M, Tuinman PR. EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting. Crit Care. 2022 Apr 8;26(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5.
- Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
- Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, Farias P, Murray A, Brace D, Brochard LJ, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Ferguson ND. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):642-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
- Ebadi M, Bhanji RA, Dunichand-Hoedl AR, Mazurak VC, Baracos VE, Montano-Loza AJ. Sarcopenia Severity Based on Computed Tomography Image Analysis in Patients with Cirrhosis. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 11;12(11):3463. doi: 10.3390/nu12113463.
- Cappellini I, Picciafuochi F, Bartolucci M, Matteini S, Virgili G, Adembri C. Evaluation of diaphragm thickening by diaphragm ultrasonography: a reproducibility and a repeatability study. J Ultrasound. 2021 Dec;24(4):411-416. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00462-x. Epub 2020 May 1.
- Boussuges A, Finance J, Chaumet G, Bregeon F. Diaphragmatic motion recorded by M-mode ultrasonography: limits of normality. ERJ Open Res. 2021 Mar 22;7(1):00714-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00714-2020. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Neurologische Manifestationen
- Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
- Neuromuskuläre Manifestationen
- Pathologische Prozesse
- Neubildungen nach Standort
- Neubildungen
- Pathologische Zustände, Anatomisch
- Erkrankungen der Atemwege
- Neubildungen nach histologischem Typ
- Neoplasmen des Verdauungssystems
- Erkrankungen des Verdauungssystems
- Leberkrankheiten
- Neubildungen, Drüsen und Epithelien
- Adenokarzinom
- Lebertumoren
- Karzinom
- Muskelatrophie
- Atrophie
- Pleuraerkrankungen
- Pathologische Zustände, Anzeichen und Symptome
- Anzeichen und Symptome
- Karzinom, hepatozellulär
- Fibrose
- Sarkopenie
- Pleuraerguss
- Aszites
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- DiaphragmCirrhosis_AU26
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .