Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Case-Based Collaborative Learning for Arrhythmia Recognition in Novice Intensive Care Nurses

24. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Naile ALANKAYA

Effect of Case-Based Collaborative Learning on Arrhythmia Recognition and Patient Safety Attitudes Among Novice Intensive Care Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) in improving arrhythmia recognition and patient safety attitudes among novice intensive care nurses. Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience working in coronary or cardiovascular surgery intensive care units are randomly assigned to an intervention or control group.

Both groups participate in the institution's routine orientation process for newly employed intensive care nurses. In addition, the intervention group receives a structured CBCL-based arrhythmia education program delivered in two 120-minute sessions over two consecutive weeks. The program uses clinical case scenarios, ECG tracings, individual assessment, small-group collaborative discussion, shared clinical decision-making, and structured feedback. The control group receives no additional study-specific arrhythmia education during the study period.

The primary outcome is arrhythmia recognition and awareness, and the secondary outcome is patient safety attitudes. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and at the three-month follow-up in both groups. An additional immediate post-intervention assessment is conducted in the intervention group to examine short-term changes following the educational program.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Early recognition and appropriate interpretation of cardiac arrhythmias are important competencies for nurses working in intensive care settings, where changes in cardiac rhythm may require rapid clinical assessment and timely escalation of care. Novice nurses may have limited opportunities to develop these competencies through clinical experience alone. This study therefore evaluates a case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) approach designed to integrate arrhythmia recognition with clinical reasoning, nursing decision-making, and patient-safety principles.

The CBCL intervention uses clinically oriented arrhythmia scenarios accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess each case individually and then work in small groups to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Group conclusions are subsequently discussed with the educator, who facilitates analysis of the case, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. Patient-safety principles, including recognition of hemodynamic instability, timely escalation of care, differentiation of true arrhythmias from monitoring artefacts, and assessment of the patient's clinical condition, are integrated throughout the educational activities.

The main effectiveness evaluation compares the intervention and control groups at the three-month follow-up while accounting for baseline outcome levels. An additional assessment immediately after completion of the educational program is conducted only in the intervention group to explore the immediate educational response and whether the observed improvement is maintained at three months.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

72

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • Kartal
      • Istanbul, Kartal, Türkei (türkiye), 17100
        • Rekrutierung
        • Kosuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience
  • Currently working in the coronary intensive care unit or cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit
  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in a structured arrhythmia or ECG training program

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Case-Based Collaborative Learning Group
Participants receive the institution's routine orientation for newly employed intensive care nurses in addition to a structured case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) program focused on arrhythmia recognition, ECG interpretation, clinical decision-making, and patient safety. The CBCL program consists of two 120-minute sessions delivered over two consecutive weeks. Each session incorporates clinical case scenarios, ECG tracings, individual assessment, small-group collaborative discussion, shared clinical decision-making, facilitator-guided analysis, and structured feedback.
The intervention consists of two 120-minute educational sessions delivered once weekly over two consecutive weeks by a researcher with formal ECG training and certification in ECG interpretation. Each session uses clinically oriented arrhythmia cases accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess the case individually and then work in small groups of 5-6 nurses to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Groups present their conclusions, followed by facilitator-guided whole-group analysis, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. The program addresses ECG interpretation, life-threatening rhythms, bradyarrhythmias, atrioventricular blocks, atrial tachyarrhythmias, medication- and electrolyte-related ECG changes, QT prolongation, and monitoring problems. Patient-safety principles and appropriate nursing responses and escalation of care are integrated throughout the cases.
Andere Namen:
  • CBCL-Based Arrhythmia Education
Kein Eingriff: Control Group
Participants undergo the institution's routine orientation process for newly employed intensive care nurses and continue their usual clinical practice. They receive no study-specific CBCL intervention or additional arrhythmia-focused education from the research team during the study period. After completion of the three-month follow-up and final data collection, participants in the control group are offered the same arrhythmia education program.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 3 months after randomization
The Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT) consists of 27 items assessing arrhythmia recognition and awareness. Each correct response is scored as 1 and each incorrect response as 0, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate better arrhythmia recognition and awareness.
Baseline and 3 months after randomization

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 3 months after randomization
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is used to assess participants' attitudes toward patient safety. The questionnaire includes 46 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale and comprises six dimensions: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perceptions of management, and working conditions. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward patient safety.
Baseline and 3 months after randomization

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Naile Alankaya, Associate Prof. PhD, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

19. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

19. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

24. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • COMU-SBF-NA-04

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the informed consent obtained from participants did not specifically include provisions for public sharing of individual-level data. Aggregated study findings will be reported in scientific publications.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .