Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Case-Based Collaborative Learning for Arrhythmia Recognition in Novice Intensive Care Nurses

24 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: Naile ALANKAYA

Effect of Case-Based Collaborative Learning on Arrhythmia Recognition and Patient Safety Attitudes Among Novice Intensive Care Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) in improving arrhythmia recognition and patient safety attitudes among novice intensive care nurses. Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience working in coronary or cardiovascular surgery intensive care units are randomly assigned to an intervention or control group.

Both groups participate in the institution's routine orientation process for newly employed intensive care nurses. In addition, the intervention group receives a structured CBCL-based arrhythmia education program delivered in two 120-minute sessions over two consecutive weeks. The program uses clinical case scenarios, ECG tracings, individual assessment, small-group collaborative discussion, shared clinical decision-making, and structured feedback. The control group receives no additional study-specific arrhythmia education during the study period.

The primary outcome is arrhythmia recognition and awareness, and the secondary outcome is patient safety attitudes. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and at the three-month follow-up in both groups. An additional immediate post-intervention assessment is conducted in the intervention group to examine short-term changes following the educational program.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Early recognition and appropriate interpretation of cardiac arrhythmias are important competencies for nurses working in intensive care settings, where changes in cardiac rhythm may require rapid clinical assessment and timely escalation of care. Novice nurses may have limited opportunities to develop these competencies through clinical experience alone. This study therefore evaluates a case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) approach designed to integrate arrhythmia recognition with clinical reasoning, nursing decision-making, and patient-safety principles.

The CBCL intervention uses clinically oriented arrhythmia scenarios accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess each case individually and then work in small groups to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Group conclusions are subsequently discussed with the educator, who facilitates analysis of the case, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. Patient-safety principles, including recognition of hemodynamic instability, timely escalation of care, differentiation of true arrhythmias from monitoring artefacts, and assessment of the patient's clinical condition, are integrated throughout the educational activities.

The main effectiveness evaluation compares the intervention and control groups at the three-month follow-up while accounting for baseline outcome levels. An additional assessment immediately after completion of the educational program is conducted only in the intervention group to explore the immediate educational response and whether the observed improvement is maintained at three months.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

72

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Kartal
      • Istanbul, Kartal, Turchia (Türkiye), 17100
        • Reclutamento
        • Kosuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience
  • Currently working in the coronary intensive care unit or cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit
  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in a structured arrhythmia or ECG training program

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Case-Based Collaborative Learning Group
Participants receive the institution's routine orientation for newly employed intensive care nurses in addition to a structured case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) program focused on arrhythmia recognition, ECG interpretation, clinical decision-making, and patient safety. The CBCL program consists of two 120-minute sessions delivered over two consecutive weeks. Each session incorporates clinical case scenarios, ECG tracings, individual assessment, small-group collaborative discussion, shared clinical decision-making, facilitator-guided analysis, and structured feedback.
The intervention consists of two 120-minute educational sessions delivered once weekly over two consecutive weeks by a researcher with formal ECG training and certification in ECG interpretation. Each session uses clinically oriented arrhythmia cases accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess the case individually and then work in small groups of 5-6 nurses to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Groups present their conclusions, followed by facilitator-guided whole-group analysis, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. The program addresses ECG interpretation, life-threatening rhythms, bradyarrhythmias, atrioventricular blocks, atrial tachyarrhythmias, medication- and electrolyte-related ECG changes, QT prolongation, and monitoring problems. Patient-safety principles and appropriate nursing responses and escalation of care are integrated throughout the cases.
Altri nomi:
  • CBCL-Based Arrhythmia Education
Nessun intervento: Control Group
Participants undergo the institution's routine orientation process for newly employed intensive care nurses and continue their usual clinical practice. They receive no study-specific CBCL intervention or additional arrhythmia-focused education from the research team during the study period. After completion of the three-month follow-up and final data collection, participants in the control group are offered the same arrhythmia education program.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 3 months after randomization
The Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT) consists of 27 items assessing arrhythmia recognition and awareness. Each correct response is scored as 1 and each incorrect response as 0, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate better arrhythmia recognition and awareness.
Baseline and 3 months after randomization

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 3 months after randomization
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is used to assess participants' attitudes toward patient safety. The questionnaire includes 46 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale and comprises six dimensions: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perceptions of management, and working conditions. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward patient safety.
Baseline and 3 months after randomization

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Naile Alankaya, Associate Prof. PhD, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

19 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

19 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

21 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

26 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

24 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • COMU-SBF-NA-04

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the informed consent obtained from participants did not specifically include provisions for public sharing of individual-level data. Aggregated study findings will be reported in scientific publications.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .