Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Thread-Embedding Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

24. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Bui Pham Minh Man, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Thread-Embedding Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compared thread-embedding acupuncture with electroacupuncture for adults with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electrodiagnosis. Eighty participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either thread-embedding acupuncture or electroacupuncture. Both groups also received standard care, including lifestyle modification, nocturnal wrist splinting, nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol as needed. Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, whereas electroacupuncture was administered 10 times over the same period. Participants were assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4. The primary outcome was the change in paresthesia intensity from baseline to week 4, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, symptom severity, functional status, paracetamol use, and adverse events.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

80

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 70000
        • University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City - Campus 3

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Primary diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome with pain and paresthesia, confirmed by electrodiagnosis and classified as mild or moderate severity.
  • Unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome involving either the right or left hand.
  • Voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Structural wrist damage due to previous surgery or trauma.
  • History of carpal tunnel syndrome surgery.
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome with an indication for surgical treatment.
  • Concomitant cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, proximal median neuropathy, other upper-limb neuropathies, or polyneuropathy confirmed by electrodiagnosis.
  • Systemic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic arthritis.
  • Hypothyroidism.
  • Unstable or untreated severe health conditions, including end-stage renal failure, severe hepatic failure, or NYHA class IV heart failure.
  • Use of anti-inflammatory medications within two weeks before enrollment.
  • Alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • History of allergy, anaphylaxis, or contraindications to thread-embedding acupuncture or electroacupuncture, including emergency conditions, cachexia, local skin infections or dermatological diseases at acupoint sites, or allergy to absorbable sutures.
  • Current treatment with anticoagulant drugs or diagnosed coagulation disorders.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Thread-Embedding Acupuncture
Participants received thread-embedding acupuncture twice over two weeks, at baseline and week 1, in addition to standard care.
Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, at baseline and week 1. Sterile polydioxanone thread-embedding needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5. The device consisted of a sterile 31-G stainless-steel cannula with a 30-mm needle shaft and a 30-mm polydioxanone thread folded in half, corresponding to an embedded thread length of approximately 15 mm. The thread was placed within the muscle layer and left in situ after withdrawal of the needle.
Both treatment groups received standard care throughout the four-week study period, including lifestyle modification to avoid wrist flexion and strain, nocturnal wrist splinting, daily nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol 500 mg as needed for intolerable pain with a minimum four-hour interval between doses.
Aktiver Komparator: Electroacupuncture
Participants received electroacupuncture once daily, five times per week for two weeks, for a total of 10 sessions, in addition to standard care.
Both treatment groups received standard care throughout the four-week study period, including lifestyle modification to avoid wrist flexion and strain, nocturnal wrist splinting, daily nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol 500 mg as needed for intolerable pain with a minimum four-hour interval between doses.
Electroacupuncture was administered once daily, five times per week for two weeks, for a total of 10 sessions. Sterile disposable needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5. Continuous biphasic rectangular pulses with alternating frequencies of 2/100 Hz every 3 seconds and a pulse width of 0.2 ms were delivered for 20 minutes. Stimulation intensity was adjusted within 2-5 mA according to participant tolerance.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline in Paresthesia Visual Analog Scale Score at Week 4
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 4
Paresthesia intensity was measured using a self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no symptom, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable symptom. The outcome was the change in paresthesia-VAS score from baseline to week 4.
Baseline to Week 4

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline in Paresthesia Visual Analog Scale Score at Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 2
Paresthesia intensity was measured using a self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no symptom, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable symptom. The outcome was the change in paresthesia-VAS score from baseline to week 2.
Baseline to Week 2
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
Pain intensity was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no pain, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable pain. The outcome was the change in pain-VAS score from baseline.
Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
Change From Baseline in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Scores
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire consists of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS). The SSS includes 11 items scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 11 to 55. The FSS includes 8 items scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 8 to 40. The overall BCTQ score was calculated as the sum of the SSS and FSS scores, ranging from 19 to 95. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and functional impairment.
Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
Weekly Paracetamol Consumption
Zeitfenster: Weekly during the 4-week study period
Rescue paracetamol use was recorded as the number of 500-mg tablets consumed per week.
Weekly during the 4-week study period
Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: From baseline through Week 4
Adverse events occurring during the study were monitored and recorded, including events such as ecchymosis and localized pain associated with the acupuncture procedures.
From baseline through Week 4

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Mitarbeiter

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Minh-Man P Bui, PhD, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

21. Oktober 2024

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

26. Mai 2025

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

26. Mai 2025

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

24. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

24. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

24. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Beginning after publication of the study results, with no predetermined end date.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

De-identified individual participant data will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Requests should include the purpose of the proposed analysis and will be considered by the study investigators, subject to applicable ethical and institutional requirements.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .