Motor Imagery Training and Shooting Performance in Adolescent Basketball Players
Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions in Adolescent Basketball Players
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
-
Bursa, Türkei (türkiye), 16000
- Bursa Uludag University
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Kind
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male basketball players aged 15-17 years.
- Regular participation in basketball training.
- Voluntary participation in the study.
- Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian and assent from the participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of a musculoskeletal injury or health condition that could prevent participation in basketball training or performance testing.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Motor Imagery Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training and additionally completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks.
Each motor imagery session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training.
The imagery exercises emphasized an internal visual perspective and kinesthetic sensations related to basketball shooting performance.
|
Participants completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks, in addition to their routine basketball training.
Each session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training.
The program was structured according to the PETTLEP model (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, and Perspective) and adapted to basketball shooting.
Participants predominantly used an internal visual perspective and were instructed to imagine kinesthetic sensations associated with shooting, including ball release, wrist movement, jumping, balance, and the ball entering the basket.
|
|
Kein Eingriff: Control Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training throughout the eight-week study period and did not receive any additional motor imagery intervention.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Two-Point Shooting Performance
Zeitfenster: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Two-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011).
Participants moved between six designated two-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Three-Point Shooting Performance
Zeitfenster: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Three-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011).
Participants moved between six designated three-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Two-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
Zeitfenster: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Two-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard two-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Three-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
Zeitfenster: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Three-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard three-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Studienstuhl: Sadettin Erol, PhD, Uludag University
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 2026/176/6/23
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .