Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

CEST-PROTECT: Proximal Flow Control With a Balloon Guide Catheter Plus Distal Embolic Protection: a Randomised, Open-label Trial Evaluating Cerebral Protection Techniques (CEST-PROTECT)

20. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Balloon Guide Catheter-Mediated Proximal Flow Control Plus Distal Embolic Protection Versus Distal Embolic Protection Alone During Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Complex High-Risk Carotid Stenosis-A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded Trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy can reduce the occurrence of new cerebral ischemic lesions compared with a single cerebral protection strategy in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dual cerebral protection using proximal flow control combined with a distal embolic protection device or conventional single cerebral protection. Brain magnetic resonance imaging will be performed after the procedure to assess new ischemic lesions. The study will also evaluate peri-procedural neurological events and other safety and efficacy outcomes.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Carotid artery stenting is an established treatment for selected patients with carotid artery stenosis, but peri-procedural cerebral embolization remains an important concern. Distal embolic protection devices are commonly used during carotid artery stenting; however, embolization may occur during lesion crossing or device manipulation before complete distal protection is established.

The CEST-PROTECT trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study designed to investigate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy provides additional cerebral protection compared with a conventional single protection strategy during carotid artery stenting. Participants will be randomly assigned to the dual-protection group or the single-protection group.

In the dual-protection group, proximal flow control will be combined with a distal embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting. In the single-protection group, carotid artery stenting will be performed using conventional distal embolic protection alone.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion-weighted imaging, will be performed after the procedure to identify new cerebral ischemic lesions. Clinical neurological outcomes, procedural outcomes, and safety events will also be assessed during follow-up. The study is intended to determine whether the dual-protection strategy can reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolic injury without increasing procedure-related complications.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

500

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 80 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 80 years, regardless of sex.
  2. Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70%, with the degree of stenosis determined according to the prespecified NASCET method and confirmed by CTA, DSA, or MRA.
  3. Presence of at least one protocol-defined complex high-risk carotid stenosis feature confirmed by carotid ultrasonography, CTA, DSA, HR-VWI, or other protocol-specified imaging modalities.
  4. Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other cerebrovascular lesions that may substantially increase peri-procedural risk or interfere with assessment of the primary outcome, including an untreated ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm >5 mm, cerebral arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, or other vascular lesions considered to pose significant risk by multidisciplinary assessment.
  2. Severe ipsilateral intracranial tandem stenosis ≥70% that is related to a recent ischemic event, is planned for intervention during the study follow-up period, or may interfere with attribution of post-procedural stroke; or complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery with an unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest.
  3. Technical conditions precluding carotid artery stenting or preventing safe implementation of either randomized cerebral protection strategy, including target-vessel occlusion or near-occlusion with distal collapse; free-floating thrombus or high-burden active intraluminal thrombus; absence of an appropriate landing zone for the distal embolic protection device or balloon flow-control segment in the common carotid artery; inability to safely cross, deploy, or retrieve the distal protection device; inability to safely and stably position the balloon guide catheter; severe aortic arch, supra-aortic, carotid-origin, or iliofemoral disease resulting in unacceptable transfemoral access risk; severe vascular tortuosity, angulation, or calcification resulting in unacceptable device-passage, vascular-injury, or stent-deployment risk; unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest; or any other condition preventing safe implementation of either randomized strategy.
  4. Previous stenting, angioplasty, or other endovascular mechanical treatment of the target carotid artery; or carotid lesions not prespecified for inclusion in the etiologic complex-lesion cohort, including carotid dissection, vasculitis, traumatic or infectious lesions, pseudoaneurysm, or fibromuscular dysplasia other than carotid web.
  5. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3 after a recent stroke, or the presence of a large cerebral infarction, significant cerebral edema or mass effect, hemorrhagic transformation, impaired consciousness, progressive neurological deficits, or clinically unstable neurological status.
  6. Contraindication to contrast agents, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, or medications required during the procedure that cannot be adequately managed; or inability or expected inability to receive or complete protocol-required dual antiplatelet therapy.
  7. A recent ischemic event considered primarily cardioembolic, or the presence of a high-risk cardiac source of embolism such as left atrial or left ventricular thrombus, infective endocarditis, a mechanical heart valve with inadequate anticoagulation, or an intracardiac mass. Atrial fibrillation alone is not an absolute exclusion criterion unless it is considered the primary cause of the qualifying ischemic event or required anticoagulation cannot be safely combined with the protocol-required antiplatelet regimen.
  8. A serious medical condition precluding elective carotid artery stenting, including active bleeding, uncorrectable coagulopathy, severe renal dysfunction without adequate risk-control measures, persistent uncontrolled severe hypertension, active severe infection, myocardial infarction within 6 weeks before screening, unstable acute coronary syndrome, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled severe arrhythmia, or another serious systemic disease.
  9. Contraindication to MRI or anticipated inability to complete the protocol-required baseline and post-procedural MRI/DWI examinations.
  10. Current participation, or participation within 3 months before screening, in another clinical study that may affect the study intervention, safety assessment, or primary outcome evaluation; or planned major surgery or endovascular treatment during the peri-procedural period or 30-day follow-up that may interfere with assessment of study outcomes.
  11. Inability to understand or comply with study procedures, provide valid informed consent, complete the 30-day clinical follow-up or neurological assessments, or provide reliable primary outcome data; or life expectancy shorter than the required study follow-up period.
  12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study, substantially increases study-related risk, or may compromise the reliability of the study results.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: BGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device

Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device, allowing the procedure to be performed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection

Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device. Carotid artery stenting will then be completed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection.

Aktiver Komparator: Single distal filter embolic protection device

Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully documented.

Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Ipsilateral Cerebral Ischemic Lesion on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Zeitfenster: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one new cerebral ischemic lesion on the side of the target carotid artery detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) after carotid artery stenting, compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. New ischemic lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Composite of Any Stroke or All-Cause Death Within 30 Days
Zeitfenster: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

First occurrence of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after carotid artery stenting. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Number and Distribution of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Zeitfenster: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The number and distribution of new cerebral ischemic lesions detected on post-procedural diffusion-weighted MRI compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. Distribution of new ischemic lesions according to laterality (ipsilateral or contralateral to the target carotid artery) and vascular territory involvement (single or multiple vascular territories). Lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Characteristics of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI
Zeitfenster: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

New cerebral ischemic lesions will be classified as cortical or subcortical. Lesions will also be categorized according to the maximum lesion diameter.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Proportion of Participants With New Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Cerebral Infarction
Zeitfenster: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportions of participants with newly developed symptomatic cerebral infarction and newly developed asymptomatic cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting will be assessed separately. Symptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction associated with corresponding new neurological symptoms, whereas asymptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction without corresponding new neurological symptoms.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Ipsilateral Ischemic Stroke
Zeitfenster: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of ipsilateral ischemic stroke will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Ipsilateral TIA
Zeitfenster: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of ipsilateral TIA will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of All-cause Death
Zeitfenster: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The incidences of all-cause death will be assessed individually.

Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
NIHSS Score and Change From Baseline
Zeitfenster: At 7 (±2) days or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, and at 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Neurological impairment will be assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 7 days or hospital discharge and again at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

At 7 (±2) days or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, and at 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Modified Rankin Scale Score and Change From Baseline
Zeitfenster: At 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Functional status will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

At 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage
Zeitfenster: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing any intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting.

Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) after carotid artery stenting.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting
Incidence of Device- or Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

The proportion of participants experiencing adverse events or serious adverse events considered related to the study device or study procedure.

Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Oktober 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. April 2029

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

20. September 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. September 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

25. September 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

25. September 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

20. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. September 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • CEST-PROTECT

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Deidentified individual participant data will not be shared.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .